User talk:Redskins0756
January 2008
Shiva Rawat
Re: I am extremely discontent with YOUR conduct
Recently I made an entry about a person whom I knew named Shiva Rawat. You deleted that entry and told me this was not to be posted. I am extremely angry at the conduct you have used because not only do you not KNOW this person, but you proceeded to delete the entry without even doing any research whatsoever. Please try to refrain from acting in such an unprofessional manor.
Thank you,
Mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redskins0756 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hello, Mike.
- I'm sorry about the distress caused by the deletion of the article you created about well sourced, and I'm afraid the content you created did not satisfy these standards.
- Happy editing, Popplewick (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
February 2008
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)removal of reference at Chantilly High School
Hiya Red!
I just removed a reference that you put in on this article to support a controversy about the school's schedule. If you check the bottom of the webpage, the source for that information is wikipedia. Per
- Red,
- I saw that you removed the fact tag that I put on this section. This section either is in violation of WP:NPOV, or comes very close to it. I was within my rights to delete it, but am assuming good faith. Even then, it must be referenced and cited (even then, I'm not 100% sure that some other editor won't come along and delete it for violating NPOV). Please don't take this as an attack on your editing or how you feel about this subject, but I think most in the community would agree that this requires sourcing. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)]
Teacher controversy
Hiya again Red!
I just deleted one of the sections you had about one of the teachers. The reference you had was a blog, and per