User talk:Religions Explorer

Welcome!

Hello and

welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No
sock puppetry
.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any
blocked from editing
.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is
not a forum
.

The

help pages, add a question to the village pump

or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Your contributed article, The Imposter Messiah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

the article's talk page

.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by
talk) 12:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

This is not a case of article duplication, but a case of changing the title of the article from Arabic to English. "Masih ad-Dajjal" is not an English title.--Religions Explorer (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As explained below, cutting-and-pasting is not the way to move pages. Effectively you're stealing credit for the work of many other editors.
talk) 13:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

December 2015

cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution
. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is
talk) 12:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

talk) 12:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

As Bazj says, moving the article is too drastic.

What we can do is set up some redirects. We need to be careful not to assume whether the users are looking for Jewish, Christian or Islamic concepts as the name is generic enough to cover all three.
Imposter Messiah
(no need for "The" as there can be more than one imposter) to the same place.

The next thing we can do is make sure that List of messiah claimants, in addition to linking to specific claimants, also links to the articles about the Dajal and the Christian Antichrist. That way, anybody following that search will get to these subjects, if that is what they want. I'm going to have a look at the best way to do that now. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have linked that now. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious edits

Please refrain from making substantive changes to the lead section of
talk) 09:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

No the burden is on you now, since my changes were approved by other editors.--Religions Explorer (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Where did this approval take place? I have added a section to the talk page for you to respond. ~
talk) 09:47, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ANI-notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 20:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

page protection
.

This is related to the issue raised at the administrators' noticeboard — in short, edit-warring at the
I'm not trying to punish you; my point in blocking you is merely to prevent the aforementioned confusion for readers. The "you have been blocked" box includes directions to request an unblock; if you give a reason of "I'm willing to drop the issue" or "I'm willing to discuss these issues at the talk page", I expect you'll be unblocked, although of course please follow through with your pledge, because returning to the actions that prompted the block will probably lead to a longer block. Nyttend (talk) 06:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Only warning

If you pull a stunt like this one again, you'll be blocked and for a good while longer than the last time! Favonian (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The edit linked as "this one" was the biggest reason for this block, although your other edits since the first block's expiration also factored into it. Please stop this kind of stuff immediately; this block is 24x as long as the first one, and if you keep it up, the next block might continue the trend. Nyttend (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You son of a bitch. I don't care if you block this acount or not jackass. God damn you and all the nasty trolls on this website--Explorer999 (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And if you make more
personal attacks like that one your ability to edit this talk page will be revoked. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:38, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

ANI (again, after repeated disruptions right after block)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI again, hopefully last time and you've built up to a permanent ban from the site

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Religions_Explorer&oldid=1045439852"