User talk:Retal

Hello, Retal, and

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Geniac 14:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote: "I have written two new articles: Maya Maize God and Howler Monkey Gods. What will happen to them? They seem still to be in limbo somehow." You don't need to use the Articles for Creation process now that you are registered. Please see

{helpme}I wrote an article (stub) on the Maya Moon Goddess, applied the necessary formulas, and dit not get the opportunity to preview it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Retal (talk • contribs)

Hi, the article you wrote never got saved. Once you write anything on any page in the edit mode, you do get the opportunity to preview it. Simply click on Show Preview tab below the edit box. Once you are satisfied, then click on Save page. Does this answer your question? —

^(talk) 09:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

• Bacabs —(Discuss)— Bacabs links up with non-English Wikipedias and the plural is more common than the singular —86.87.62.150 21:30, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hello, Retal. You have new messages at Talk:Treblinka trials.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please be cautious with expressions that may introduce bias or lack precision and refrain from inserting contentious unsourced statements to Wikipedia articles: [1][2][3]. Such additions do no service to the project of building an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Omnipaedista (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J. Eric S. Thompson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrea Joyce Stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maya religion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tun and Katun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Retal. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Benito Mussolini. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 20:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Retal. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Realdania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Retal. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No usage of plural of museum(s) is found in Australia - they are museums, thanks... JarrahTree 10:37, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep reintroducing that content at SJW article, you'll eventually get a block.

Your recent editing history at Social justice warrior shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being

]

personal attacks

You're testing your luck.

talk) 01:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

May 2021

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to George Pell. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Meticulo (talk) 13:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ancient Maya art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piedras Negras.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You should know better by now but also you should realize that your point would be better made without attacking other editors, including me. Keep it up and my next comment will be at ANI where I will be requesting a block of your account for personal attacks and obvious trolling. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will second that. If you cannot carry on a civil conversation with others without resorting to insults, you will be sanctioned. Primefac (talk) 17:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the insult? My opponent signs with Praxidice, defined as "goddess of judicial punishment and the exactor of vengeance", so I jokingly responded to this provocative name by exchanging it for Lyssa, defined as "spirit of mad rage, frenzy, and rabies in animals...closely related to the Maniae, the spirits of madness and insanity." Should I really be lectured and threatened because I tried to bring some humor into the discussion? Be an adult.Retal (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, equating a user to "mad rage, frenzy and rabies" and "insanity" is very mature, so funny. You know what you're doing and I suggest you stop. Ironic you're whining about being lectured when you yourself made a comment without any context and expected users to sus it out without any details and then further insulted editors because you have an issue with pronouns. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But then be so decent as to restore my initial remark regarding "Wikipedia English Language Policy".Retal (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not hat it, @Primefac did. And as you failed to actually elaborate on what the issue is, I doubt it'll be restored. Also you can't seriously ask other people to be "decent" and do you favors when you've still left personal attacks up and are continuing to engage in combative behavior. But either way, you'll have to ask the admin who hatted it. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to un-hat the conversation because it is not going to go anywhere. The current consensus on Wikipedia is to use the pronouns preferred by the subject (if known), and trying to get a single article changed by means of a post that I can only quantify as falling somewhere between

concern-trolling is not going to change things, nor will it win you any debates. Primefac (talk) 18:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Primefac: You seem to like insulting people by throwing ludicrous terminology at their heads, but I understand the controversial issue of pronouns has been "pacified" by allowing jargon to take the place of understandable English. What a pity.Retal (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 19:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Dylan Mulvaney

When I reverted this edit I though I was dealing with a new account here to vandalize the article, but I see you've been here for some time. I see you are aware of the

gender and sexuality, but consider this a refresher. Edits like that one are considered disruptive. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 09:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Flounder fillet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Cass Review seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flounder fillet (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retal, you've been warned about

WP:NPOV many times over the year, and you're aware that gender and sexuality controversies are a contentious topic. Don't insert your own commentary into articles. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Editing other people's comments

Oh dear, please don't mess with other people's comments like this. It's terribly impolite and leaves a confusing mess to boot. It's also one of the things our etiquette guideline explicitly calls out as

not done. I'm reverting that, but feel free to place a new comment below, rather than inside of, void's. Going forwards, if you must reply to every point, please quote void's comment in your own reply, rather than doing what you did there. --Licks-rocks (talk) 14:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry, it seemed the most efficient thing to do. No impoliteness intended. Retal (talk) 20:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No intended impoliteness assumed 😉. Advanced tip: if you want to quote someone and keep their text separate from yours, you can use the template {{tq|(quoted text here)}} to create a nicely visually distinguishable quoted segment. Have a nice day!

(example: "this is what that looks like") --Licks-rocks (talk) 20:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Janice Fiamengo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Janice Fiamengo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ANU^writes 03:46, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]