User talk:Meticulo

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome! User:Anotherclown (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2015 (UTC) Anotherclown (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Meticulo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meticulo! I'm Kethrus. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. --  Kethrus |talk to me  12:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Exercise Croix du Sud. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Regardless of publication and name, there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else, and what's still listed here is too trivial for actual notability in Wikipedia policy; it's quite rare for such new companies to be notable simply because it's too soon in their life. When article is overfocused with what their own PR would emulate, it's simply not substance for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Ingogo (company)
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I made some comments at Talk:Peter Lamborn Wilson you might be interested in–I quote Knight's book, and I found an academic paper discussing the same issue. (I don't want to edit the article myself, but feel free to incorporate the cites/quotes however you think fit.) 180.181.102.164 (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll have a look. - Meticulo (talk) 08:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ingogo (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingogo (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SwisterTwister talk 00:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been wondering while reviewing certain pages in Wikipedia i’ve seen your name with a few downsides of losing points of being an editor. I’d like for you to fix it please Thanks! -Ihatetea Ihatetea (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point me to examples, please, Ihatetea? Also, I am wondering why you request that people not post on your own talk page. Thanks. Meticulo (talk) 01:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chasing the Moon (2019 documentary) Bishal Shrestha (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Umbrella Entertainment. Since you had some involvement with the Umbrella Entertainment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Matthew hk (talk) 17:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EuroCyclingTrips - CMI Pro Cycling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My name is Zed Hyea, I want to talk about the changes I made in the Indonesia-Malaysia confrontation article. In that article I am making changes to the result of the war, actually, the results of the war can be written as "Indonesia-Malaysia peace agreement", This can be said this because the war ended not because of the inability of the Indonesian military to fight, but because Sukarno stepped down from the presidency due to the 30 September Movement led to Suharto's rise as president and ended the war with a conference in Bangkok that made the peace agreement on August 11 colored by Sukarno's objections even though he no longer had a position in the country. From this, we can see that the end of the war was not due to the defeat of Indonesia but because of the peace agreement by Soeharto. In that way, I beg you to accept the changes made to the results of the

Thanks for posting, Zed Hyea. Sorry, but I should have written a clearer edit summary. When I wrote, "Please discuss rationale for this change on the talk page...", I meant at Talk:Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation rather than my own talk page. Is it okay with you if I copy our discussion so far to that page? Other editors may also have something to contribute, and perhaps even help us find a solution to our edit conflicts. Thanks, Meticulo (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

No reply, hence strikethrough. Meticulo (talk) 12:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)][reply]

Nice job not bothering to notify me of the AFD.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 22:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well,

WP:DRV. Finally, it would be good if you could drop the sarcasm. Meticulo (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Dear Meticulo, be a bit more meticulous and read the article before interfering. For example this passage: "In his preliminary remarks during sentencing, [Chief Judge] Kidd mentioned examples of a "witch-hunt" or "lynch mob" mentality in relation to Pell during the lead-up to his conviction." So what is your point?Retal (talk) 13:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that adding the phrase "With good reason" so the sentence commences "With good reason, Pell has complained..." makes it read as editorialising, almost as much as if you'd added "And he is correct". See

WP:IMPARTIAL, particularly "The tone of Wikipedia articles should be impartial, neither endorsing nor rejecting a particular point of view." Meticulo (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

"The directors, producers and screenwriters were named." That statement sounds way too ambiguous. That's why I deleted it. Maxbmogs (talk) 15:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's ambiguous about it, Maxbmogs? Those are specific roles. And the people in those roles are named earlier in the article or in the infobox. Meticulo (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You recently placed a "more citations needed" tag at Radio-frequency identification which had 141 footnotes at the time. I'm genuinely curious, where do you see a need for more citations? If anything, this article needs less citations as it is over-detailed and over-fixated with industry trivia. Your opinions would be of interest. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Response here, at talk page of article in question. Meticulo (talk) 11:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other users have made similar edits only to see them removed. Why would reaching consensus need to come from the side that is correct per History? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.249.119 (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You say you're correct. Others disagree. That's why we discuss things and try to reach a consensus. For a good approach, see

WP:BRD. Meticulo (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Happy to discuss why you are opposed to the changes. Your name suggest spanish heritage (meticulo), and I wonder what your connection to this article is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voice For The Unheard (talk • contribs) 16:47, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge, I don't have any Spanish heritage at all. My username is the result of taking the word meticulous, something to which a Wikipedia editor should aspire, and turning it into the name of a character who might appear in a Shakespearean comedy. As for my connection to the article, I was checking the Recent Changes page last night, and among the problematic edits I happened to see and revert was this one. Let's go to Talk:Hispaniola and discuss it further there. Meticulo (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Divorce Court, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it. The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Meticulo (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

My response: I am aware of that button. It's just a bad habit of mine. Sorry! You think its bad on here, try being a friend of mine and texting me. You ain't seen nothing. Lol! I will work on that. :) JudgeJudyCourthouse25 (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meticulo. Thank you for reaching out.

Your edit: I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Industrial Workers of the World, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Meticulo (talk) 10:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

As matter of fact, I know Tuli joined the Wobblies around the late 30's. I'm working on a Kupferberg biography and know more about him than Wikipedia does. This information has been confirmed by friends and family of my subject and you can find a quick source of it in an article written by journalist Benito Villa on pleasekillme.com . So please, put my edit back on the page (even if it's lightly sourced on the internet, it has been heavily sourced by human connections). Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micheal Giuditta (talk • contribs) 11:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding and adding citation, Michael. Meticulo (talk) 10:43, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to contribute to the ANI discussion about user 47.157.129.133 since you were previously involved in the user's talk page with warnings or notices. 2603:8000:A501:9B00:4425:751C:D9BD:7885 (talk) 04:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello, Meticulo. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meticulo. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit much to accuse someone of vandalism for just changing a temperature when the sentence immediately prior says "The highest observed temperature of 50.7 °C (123.3 °F) was recorded in Onslow on 13 January 2022." Steelkamp (talk) 14:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my defence, I looked for a citation in the template itself, found nothing, and took it to be a case of subtle vandalism. I've added a secondary source to the template to guard against others making the same mistake. Meticulo (talk) 08:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see the request for speedy deletion has been declined, with the reason 'The page disambiguates two articles (not zero or one) both of which mention "Jack Gance"'. So I'll ignore this for now. Meticulo (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is accurate (Cambridge Professor in Science), though for verification I have written to the Alliance Francaise, to obtain the exact references. These will be included in the main article. JohnEC Jr (talk) 02:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is here on the internet https://graciousquotes.com/albert-camus/ JohnEC Jr (talk) 04:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]