User talk:RichiSups

The page in question cited no evidence of Conservative Party membership in 2022, but other editors asserted this without evidence - I corrected the other editors. 2023 Conservative Party activity was accepted in my last edit. No evidence has been provided by the other editors on the page that Conservative Party membership cannot be held concurrently with Abolish the Assembly Party Membership. There is no evidence that the person in question has resigned or removed any Abolish the Assembly party memberships or associations. My edits partly to reflect these facts. Other edits of mine have always cited sources independent of wikepedia. I request the editing block on myself be removed.

You are blocked for

I am a new Wiki editor and was not aware of editing and the 3RR rule and others. I may have reverted the page several times in 24 hours, not to war, but because I saw it as the best way of removing the other editors citations of Conservative Party activity in 2022 - there is no evidence anywhere of this - but despite there being no evidence, certain other editors continued to cite this un-evidenced claim. Ironically, those editors who edited without evidence and sources are also banned for warring and and likely controlling multiple accounts. Similarly, there is no evidence that Abolish the Assembly Party associaton or activity has ceased; and no evidence was cited that a person cannot be simultaneously be active or a member of the Conservative Party and the Abolish the Assembly Party simulataneously - however, in spite of there being no evidence, other editors continued to revert and edit the page to the contrary. As a new and inexperienced wiki editor, I believed that multiple reverts as the easiest way to correct the inaccuracies. Once again, the editors who caused my reversions on this second point are themselves banned for warring and/or controling multiple editor identities.

You say you are aware of the edit warring rules, but you then seem to try to justify it, not tell us why it is wrong and what you will do differently. You are only blocked from the one article, please use the talk page to resolve this dispute. 331dot (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I later became aware of the blocking rules - and therefore are aware of them now - after reading up on them after being blocked several hours ago. I was not aware of them before being blocked. My actions when I was ignorant of the blocking rulesare explained in previous submissions.

Excellent. Please explain what you would do differently if unblocked. Just saying you now know the rules isn't enough, you have to convince us you understand them. Yamla (talk) 19:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I would do differently is that I would not have 'undone' other editors changes in such a short space of time. Instead, I would add new fully referenced content as and when I discover it. If I disagree with another editor, I would explain my reasons in the editing notes; but I would not 'undo' the changes; rather, I would try to devlop consensus around the changes made by everyone. I still have other edits that I wish to make to the page but I will make them without 'undoing' edits; and instead will do fully sourced and externally referenced edits developing consensus with other editors.

That sounds entirely correct. Thanks for understanding. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]