User talk:Riley Cohen

Hi Riley Cohen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Neil Gorsuch seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have replaced all incidents of "/" with "%2F". i.e. <ref name=nlj/> became <ref name=nlj%2F> Please use

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk: Richard B. Spencer for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced claims. The source is NOT in the body. As well Leveious Rolando and John Sokol has stated that he did not work with Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff. You added this info without proof. Leveious, John Sokol and Gibron never worked with them. I question your motive behind this edit. Please stop adding unsourced claims or I will file a complaint with the Wiki admin.

Please don't try closing controversial move requests. Thanks.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been reverted once before by an editor claiming the material you added was undue, and sourced to a non-RS source, so per

User:Thomas.W It was a different source when you reverted. Riley Cohen (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The new source isn't any better than the previous one, it's also

WP:BLP since it's only intended to humiliate the subject of the article. Don't forget that this is an encyclopaedia, not a blog or a forum... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 19:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Did you honestly think noone would notice? - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it before ;) Will go a bit slower next time. Riley Cohen (talk) 23:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So this isn't your first account? Would you care to elaborate? - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And, also, you've ensured that there are many eyes on your editing as well. Here's a suggestion; stay well away from any BLP articles in the future. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you. Riley Cohen (talk) 23:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a suggestion, it was a "suggestion". BLP-violators usually have a very short career here... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

User:Dennis Brown User:Ks0stm Lessen the block please. How about one week? Riley Cohen (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NippLeGate. Since you had some involvement with the NippLeGate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]