User talk:Rmkf1982

Welcome to my talk page - please leave me a message and I'll be sure to respond

Hi, Rmkf1982,

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Did you really mean to say that you "couldn't agree more" that it is proper to compare me to a mass murderer? Really? For the record, the arguments that Jeff put forward are absurdist in the extreme. I shut down the poll because the poll was not a proper dialogue and debate, and discourteous to the feelings of real contributors who would like to find some common ground on this issue. To treat that as an attempt by me to shut down debate is just wrong in the extreme. But even then, to compare me to a mass murderer? Really?--Jimbo Wales 15:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo, first of all, this is not about you but rather its about the action you took therefore when I said I agreed, I was referring to the important issue at hand - that being that the debate was shut down. For your information, and in response to the ever so slightly paranoid comment you left on my talk page, I didn't pick up on the "mass murderer" reference - I had never heard of Jimbo Jones or whoever it was, nor do I care, as it wasn't the point. The issue people are concerned with is the sudden end you put to the debate - not with you personally. We are all well aware of the enormous contributions that you have made and nobody is questioning that at all, however the sudden pulling of the debate is being questioned. You're focussing on the wrong bit of the argumentRmkf1982 | Talk 20:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But, there was no pulling of any debate, no shutting down of any debate. I shut down a wildly inappropriate vote, that's all, simply because it was ITSELF the main thing shutting down debate.--Jimbo Wales 04:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

omg someone edited jurassic park river adventure!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That was the vandal user contributions:205.202.195.116. I've given him warnings, and I'm watching him to get him blocked. Check the history of your talk page. Reywas92^Talk_Sigs 22:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) EAi 23:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assert that I am the same user as Commons:User:Rmkf1982

Yeah when I was reading the Revenge of the Mummy page for Orlando it bothered me with the Hollywood references, so I tried to take them out and still have it make sense. Thanks for noticing. Phydend 23:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jagshemash. When you write an edit summary to an article section, please do it like this

/* Section heading */ More grammar mistakes

not like this

/* Section heading - More grammar mistakes */

I got confused and thought that there was a section in Daniel Jackson called Stargate SG-1 - yet another typo. A rather strange name for a TV-moviefilm. :-) Dzienkuje. --129.241.210.38 00:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right - sorry. I was never sure whether putting the summary outside the /* */ bits would mean it wouldn't appear - I assumed the /* */ were comment indicators as in Java or C. Will know for next time. Rmkf1982 | Talk 23:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way who or what is Jagshemash? Rmkf1982 | Talk 23:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and fixed your welcome message. I had the same problem, just a small missing </font> Best,--Jh12 22:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I noticed my ride photo from the revenge of the mummy was deleted due to possible coypyright infringement. Is there a way I can get that picture back on the article? Sorry I am new to wikipedia and don't really know how to enter pictures correctly and don't know much about the fair use policy. A response would be greatly appreciated.

Hi Birdman234 - just in case you're watching my page but not checking your own, I've left you a reply on your talk page. Rmkf1982 ^Talk 21:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your revision to the Islands of Adventure article. This discussion came up on the Talk page right after the "island" was announced in May. We were trying to come up with something that said that some attractions might be rethemed, but not saying which ones for the very reasons you mentioned. Take a look at IOA's talk page; I'd be interested to know what you think on this matter.

McDoobAU93 20:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I remember reading the discussion a while ago and agreeing with both your last comment and the one after it. I think it's important to avoid passing things off as fact, or appearing to, but since all the pointers, or at least all the speculation, seem to be pointing towards Dueling Dragons etc. being rethemed, then I would go for something along the lines of what AUTiger said:

"The island will include rethemed attractions and early media speculation centered around Dueling Dragons and Flying Unicorn — Lost Continent rides with magical and fantasy themes."

Rmkf1982 ^Talk 22:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD nomination of Rules of Acquisition

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

AfD question: Recombinant text

I have very little experience in AfD matters, and am asking for your input before nominating an article for deletion, because, quite frankly, I do not want to be seen as someone who capriciously nominates articles which do not meet AfD standards.

If you have time, please take a look at

OR

, at worst, self-promotion. But maybe I'm seeing it wrong. What do you think?

I selected you and many other editors pretty much completely at random; I picked one day's AfD archives, and clicked on the talk pages of the first two or three dozen editors' talk pages I came across. I hope that in using this selection method, I will get editors who are well-versed in AfD policies, yet who also represent a good cross-section of AfD philosophies. I will monitor your talk page for your response. Thanks. Unschool (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Stargate

Hello, Rmkf1982! Your username, as well as the usernames of other members of the participants page to add your name to the active participants list. Thanks! – sgeureka t•c 16:23, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amusement Park WikiProject

Hello Rmkf1982. Recently, the

Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc  Talk  08:24, 6 November 2010 (UTC).[reply

]

Congrats

	Disney Photopass
	Thanks so much for making the pages of theme parks look good! Windyshadow32 (talk) 23:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rmkf1982. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]