Hey, I got your message and I check over the article. So far I think you're making a good start. The article asserts notability and has a neutral tone to it. That's certainly good. A few things that could definitely help the article is if you added a few more references to back up her awards and achievements. For example, the part about how she was awarded the Silver Bauhinia Star and became the justice of peace should have a source to back up these claims. I found this source for the silver Bauhinia star award so you could include that if you wanted to. If you want me to move the article into the mainspace soon, I could do that for you if you'd like. Once it's in the mainspace I could add a few tags onto the article to classify it; that way other editors can know about the article and help out to expand it. Overall, the article seems to be improved since it was originally deleted. Keep up the good work. Hope that helps.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chow Yei-ching, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
Single sourced
encyclopedic notability not indicated
, unencyclopedic tone,
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Jeandré, 2009-05-02t15:06z 15:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Re [1], I'm not sure what you're asking - the article is not ready for
I understand you were probably just taking words at face value what the article said about Herman Melville living in Troy "for a brief residence", and therefore removing it from the notable people section in good faith. But the facts are that his residence in Troy was more than brief and his home is today referred to as the Herman Melville House and as you can see, it has its own article here on wikipedia, it is on the National Register of Historic Places as well, to therefore say he doesnt deserve mention as a notable person seems a bid odd. He actually wrote at least one story while living there in Troy. Therefore I have undone your edit and added info about the house and a citation. I do appreciate your help on the article but encourage all editors to do some "due diligence" and research the info first before removing info they find dubious or is uncited. Too many editors indiscrimately remove uncited info or info they dont believe because "I've never heard about it" without looking into it because they "have no interest in the subject", I encourage editors who have no interest in researching a subject to then stay away from deleting from a subject, editing should be constructive, learning new things, and building up, it shouldnt be about removing information.Camelbinky (talk) 15:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello!
Yesterday I responded to the message re: Pre-Code Hollywood you left on my talk page. I thought you might not have seen it since you haven't replied. It might be best to continue the discussion there so everything can be read in sequence. Thanks! LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't add people directly to "(State or province) politicians" if they're already in one or more subcategories of that, such as Category:Members of the Maryland House of Delegates. Wikipedia has rules about duplicate categorization of this type. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A few MOS issues
Hello, regarding this edit, I just want to let you know that "ibid" and similar abbreviations are not recommended; see
WP:NEWLINE. Thanks. —LOLT/C 16:01, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Why are you continuing to add single line breaks here? —LOLT/C 16:23, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A quotation is not italicized simply because it is a quotation". —LOLT/C 16:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks for your help. I was not familiar with the rules on obscenities inside quotes. Trust me I am not a wannabe censor. As far as the line breaks I don't know exactly why this happens. You are not the first person to point this out, although I haven't had any problems lately. I really don't know what I am doing wrong here, b/c when I do a post-editing preview the breaks do not appear as such and it all looks OK. I will have to read up on
WP:PUNC
. I know that is not necessary to italicize quotes; I usually do so only for the purpose of emphasis.
Thanks for getting back to me. The line breaks don't show up in the
Mozilla Firefox on Windows XP or Vista, and I haven't experienced any problems. —LOLT/C 04:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Bauhinia Star bios
As per a well-reasoned opinion by User:DGG I have decided that I will only work on creating pages for Gold Bauhinia Star awardees, not those who were awarded Silver or Bronze. If I ever complete the task then I may reconsider based on individual merit. [email protected] (talk) 10:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Disambigs
Hi, you might want to review
WP:DISAMBIG. There was no need to move Mary Rundle and create a disambiguation page because we only have an article on one Mary Rundle. It doesn't matter if there are 1,000 people with that name. Also disambiguation pages shouldn't have piping or external links like that. I know you meant well but I wanted to point the correct information out to you. Drawn Some (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Proposed deletion of María Amelia López Soliño
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article María Amelia López Soliño, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
not notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
You are probably right about the original editor. I have ordered 2 books on the Wrens from my library so they may have furtehr information and leads. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]