User talk:RoadView

Excellent work on successfully bringing Illinois Route 22 to GA! Great job! —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 12:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:45, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of the last surviving players who played in a World Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Senators (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the last surviving players who played in a World Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the last surviving players who played in a World Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of United States Senators who died in the 2010s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Senators who died in the 2010s until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of members of the United States House of Representatives who died in 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of members of the United States House of Representatives who died in 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

I undid my post. I mainly did it (initially) to make there less scrolling to get to the current season, but then figured I should put it back in and think about putting the current year up at the top and the previous years (with 2008 at the bottom) down below. --posty (talk) 12:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back to this some time after the AfD (my !vote would only have amounted to an WP:ILIKEIT endorsement), I see the table sorts alphabetically by first name, which I can change to surname if you think that would be preferable, here and the others. Dru of Id (talk) 22:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have actually been thinking about that myself. I do think if I click on the name column that it makes a little more sense to sort by surname than first name. I say go for it and thanks in advance if you're actually interested in doing it for all of that and the related pages. RoadView (talk) 08:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Secret ^account 19:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Hatnote#Finalizing_the_new_proposal. Since you participated in the earlier discussion about trivial hatnotes and what to do about them, your input is requested on a finalizing a proposal. KarlB (talk) 06:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Major League Baseball records considered unbreakable (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:47, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious as to why non-voting members are not included. Since the project seems to still in its infancy, it wouldn't seem much of a bother to add ResComms and Delegates, as they are technically member of the House, even if non-voting. IIRC, the last to die was Jaime Fuster about five years ago, so there are few enough of them and I don't see much of a reason to exclude them. Star Garnet (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a fair question and my answer might not impress, but I see a big difference between being from a US state and having the power to vote and not. I think lumping them together implies that they are the same when, in fact, their power is different. The voting ability, in my view, is also the ideal cut off point where there cannot be any subjectivity for inclusion. I'm aware that there are not a large number of non voting members, but I feel the list would be a little watered down with members that have a reduced stake in legislation. In addition to your examples, Shadow congressperson would also need to be included, and I don't feel those people are in the same league as US Reps. I'm not totally exclusionary though, I have been thinking about this and although I think there is a big difference as I stated, I would actually be in favor of creating 1 new page with the same data that is exclusive to Delegates etc. That way appropriate recognition is still available. I hope this helps. RoadView (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, unlike shadow congresspersons, Dels/ResComms are legally members of the House, and have had committee voting privileges since at least the 70s, and have always had speaking rights. Their pay is the same, and the only real difference is they can't take part in floor votes, and there have been several exceptions to that limitation though the years. I'd support their addition, but that's just my two cents.

Anyways, I'm interested in helping, and I was wondering if it would work for you if I started going forward from 1900, and we can each work towards meeting somewhere in the middle, and then proceed to earlier times. Star Garnet (talk) 05:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see someone else taking an interest in these lists as it will take a lot of work. If you want to begin at 1900 or whenever, that's fine. I myself would like to add more and assist with the expansion, but I'm not sure how much I will be contributing in the near future, hopefully some. I'm curious, are you planning on getting the entire project done as fast as you can or just slowly adding over the months and years? Either way, great to have you on board. RoadView (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just going along year by year as my college homework permits. Star Garnet (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do User:Star Garnet/1900, User:Star Garnet/1901, User:Star Garnet/1902 and User:Star Garnet/1900s meet your expectations? Star Garnet (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The format all appears to be matched and looks great. There are definitely a lot more names back then. The only difference I can see is shortening "At-large" to "AL". I have since finished and added the Reps for 1976-79 and will do the rest of the decade. We also seem to have gotten some help from someone who already did the 1970s senators. RoadView (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles R. Savage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear RoadView, please have a look at her talk page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Misao_Okawa MattSucci (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the United States House of Representatives who died in 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William H. Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! About the birth/death dates of members of Congress, I generally quote those reported by the Biographical Directory of U.S. Congress. Obviously I agree that any different date given from other sources must be signaled. As for the question about representatives and senators elected but not seated, my opinion is that they should be included in a separate table. Putting them in the table with people who effectively hold office is wrong - and so is the case of William Scott Vare indeed. However, I think we would ensure a better usability of the pages adding a new table for "controversial" cases, rather than mentioning them in a note.--Jacvan (talk) 09:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the 100 oldest members of the United States House of Representatives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the 100 oldest members of the United States House of Representatives until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the oldest United States Senators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the oldest United States Senators until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:34, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the longest-lived United States Governors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the longest-lived United States Governors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 21:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RoadView. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RoadView. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:USRepDeathsYear.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:USRepDeathsYear.png
• File:USSenDeathsYear.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the