User talk:Roberth Edberg/Talk Archive 2

User	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	My userboxes	Awards	Logs	Moves	Uploads

Archives

Archive 1

Hi Roberth, after a bit of a rough start I have to say the crown of immortality is looking up. In my humble opinion it now looks much less pretentious then the first go, and is actually getting there on the way to being a valuable addition. I hope you also agree it has much improved since the original start-off. Bit sad you got caught up in a debate about the value from first go, cannot say that will never happen again in other articles, but I hope you will not let that stop you from contributing. Have a nice stay and keep up the good work. Arnoutf 20:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx Arnoutf, For a while there I almost lost my trust in Wikipedia. After some discussions with other wikipedians I found out that, this is the true essense of the data itself. We have all different views of things and as wikipedia serves as a sort of pan-brain databank, things get complicated. By reading about Fisheaters I realized the importance of participation. I will, as I already have done, continue to contribute as well as promote others to contribute as well. --Roberth Edberg 20:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution,

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Arthur J Droge and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the
  GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Arthur J Droge
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Arthur J Droge
  .

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Butseriouslyfolks 09:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, As a newbe Wikipedian it takes a while to get into'it. I rewrote the article and commented it on Talk:Arthur J Droge. --Roberth Edberg 11:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm sorry that happened, but it wasn't me. I'm not an admin so I can't delete articles. I only tag them. Did you use the {{hangon}} template and leave a note on the talk page? --Butseriouslyfolks 15:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • Maybe the admin who took care of it was rushing. If you go back to the page, it will give you an edit box now. Find the fifth square bullet near the top and click the link to "deletion log". That will tell you who deleted it, when and why (if the admin used the edit summary). Sorry again! --Butseriouslyfolks 20:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you made a userbox here are two useful userbox creators you might be interested in

• Userbox Creator with template - designed to easily generate Userboxes and has builtin template.
• Userbox Creator with template has religious image database
  - designed to easily generate Religious Userboxes and has builtin template.

Java7837 20:09, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roberth Edberg,

The Positivo Informática would like to request authorization to reproduce your image "Darius I the Great's inscription.jpg" for permanent use in our CD-ROMS and on websites kept by Positivo Informática, e.g. Portal Educacional (www.educacional.com.br), commercialized in Brazil and of restricted access to registered students and websites customized for some of our conected schools.

We found this image on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Darius_I_the_Great%27s_inscription.jpg.

We would like to receive information about how you do expect the credit lines to appear in the material. Please, let us hear from you as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely, Claudia Cruz Divisão de Portais - Iconografia Positivo Informática S. A. [email protected] —The preceding

It isn't my image. It was Aryobarzan who uploaded it to Wikipedia. --Roberth Edberg 23:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Roberth Edberg, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

Hello Roberth Edberg, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as

• Oops! I don't like to cause problems for others. Wikibot upgraded to version 1.5.1! Downloadable from here: here. Thanks! --Roberth Edberg 19:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, really like the bot or Joomla. I wondered, is there an easy way to modify it so that it will replace content anywhere regardless of the component - for example in com_lms (Joomlearn) I have questions which would be good if I could put wikipedia links in the questions?

Many thanks,

Mark

Sorry Mark, Don't have time to dig into how such thing could be possible. A contentsbot only works on content as things work today. --Roberth Edberg 19:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, never since I tried your wikibot in one of my joomla installations, I succeded in using it. It always tries to connect to [| ge.wikipedia.org]. The German Site of Wikipedia starts with de - de.wikipedia.org. Probably you can change your wikibot that way one day. Thanks Helmer from Radebeul/Dresden Germany

Strange! Have you checked you're Joomla Fish configuration? Must be something wrong there! --Roberth Edberg 20:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many have asked for native 1.5 Joomla support and I'm working on it. As beeing a father of three little doughters, time is limited. But soon...

It's now fixed and published. --Roberth Edberg 07:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

\Roberth

An article that you have been involved in editing, Joomla WikiBot, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joomla WikiBot. Thank you. -- Kl4m ^{Talk Contrib} 02:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 09:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roberth, do you know the exact line Jones introduced his claim about the movie's aims in? I don't have time to watch the clip at the moment, and I'd like to avoid the appearance of

I changed the text and added his words from the clip, which spread wider light over Alex's interpretation of the movie. --Roberth Edberg (talk) 22:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated The Zeitgeist Movement, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Zeitgeist Movement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Phirazo (talk) 04:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it make sense for Wiki to have an article on "Two Girls One Cup" but not for Zeitgeist? Is that really logical? Why don't you ask them to delete that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharelt (talk • contribs) 02:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:41, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]