User talk:RoseGirlXS

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Again, welcome! FourViolas (talk) 02:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

Rose, you are still doing this on Family Guy episode articles. Please don't. Davejohnsan (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still finding edits you have made that have contractions. Please stop. Davejohnsan (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still finding edits that you have made in which you added contractions. This has to stop. Davejohnsan (talk) 14:09, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian the Bachelor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starlet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Just reverted two edits you made today in which you added contractions. You've been warned countless times by numerous editors that this is not allowed. This is disruptive editing and can result in your account being blocked if you don't stop immediately. Davejohnsan (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate contractions to articles as you did here. Consider this your final warning. If an editor reports to me that you have yet again added improper contractions, I will interrupt your editing privileges. Articles must be written in professional tone, and that means we don't use casual speech. Additionally, I removed the content you added because it is based on your personal interpretation. We're not interested in

@Cyphoidbomb: Just reverted an edit today where RoseGirl inserted contractions. Davejohnsan (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Mpumi02. If you can't pronounce it, call me Mj224. Are you into fashion? Because I LOVE fashion. But I'm not a big-of-a-much cartoon fan, but I do like comedy. Speaking of fashion, do you enjoy exploring dresses, clothes and celeb red-carpet wear. Bye Mpumi02 (talk) 20:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Clue (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of his cover, because his final line of the movie is, "I'm gonna go home and sleep with my wife,]."<ref name=cluedofan>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cluedofan.com/movie/movie.htm |title=Clue - The

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More contractions and personal interpretations, more contractions, interpretive content and needless parentheticals. Interpretive analysis of what the series "implies", etc. You're creating more work for people to fix for no justifiable reason and I can only assume you've never read

WP:INUNIVERSE information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

• Adding another useless parenthetical after your most recent block is not the way to demonstrate that you are a capable editor. Here's a tip: If you feel an urge to add content to an article by cramming it in between parentheses, avoid that urge. Figure out a way to incorporate the content by rephrasing a sentence, or using other normal punctuation. Parentheticals are typically misused, overused, and the make articles look like crap. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please don't add contractions into articles like you did here and here. These contravene

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If I see you deliberately adding contractions in edits you make, I will be reporting you, once again, to administrators and your account will likely get another block. You have been disruptive repeatedly on this website and it is now getting really old. Do yourself a favor, if you're interested in continuing to edit on Wikipedia, and knock it off. Davejohnsan (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RoseGirlXS. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I've noticed you adding several contractions into articles. You are being opposed by multiple editors (including an administrator) on this plus there is a whole Wikipedia policy based on not adding contractions,

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely does not mean forever, but it does mean for the foreseeable future. Wikipedia

Each one of these changes represents in my estimation a conscious decision to deviate from professional tone, and the changes, when viewed against your history of problems in this area, are indistinguishable from vandalism. You are free to request an unblock, but you will need to convince a reviewing administrator that you understand what you were blocked for, as well as provide some sort of plan for how you will edit differently in the future. Note that you are not welcome to edit at Wikipedia while this account is blocked, and any edit that can be attributed to you can be reverted by any editor with no regard for whether it was useful or not. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]