User talk:Routs verdi
July 2016
Your recent editing history at Template:Black Canadians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I want to inform you that I am not having any conflict. I only want to clear some edits based on personal point of view. The other editor, for example, insist that Ethiopians has to be removed BUT Ethiopia is not even member of the Arab League. Also, denying the right of these people to be included as Black Africans and instead labeled them as multiracial people. Routs verdi (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2016 (UTC) (copied from User talk:C.Fred)
- Looking at the article, as best I can tell, two of you are making good-faith edits to the article. There's a difference of point-of-view about who qualifies for the list. So, you have a content dispute. The correct thing to do at this point is discuss the matter at Template talk:Black Canadians. If necessary, you can make a request for a third opinion to give another angle.
- However, you may not continue to edit war by repeatedly reverting the article. That will lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 17:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- I did not know about the three-revert rule, so I will not revert content at all.Routs verdi (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- I have a question. I believe based on the three-revert rule the other party has to stop to revert the content but I see there is not intention to stop his point of view changes. What I have to do?Routs verdi (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Sudanese Canadians
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by
- I realise that Sudan and South Sudan are now distinct states, but you created this article by copying the South Sudanese article, so the content is identical. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Routs verdi. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Jubian Republic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect