User talk:Rp0211/Archive 1

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rzrscm

I have closed your

I found another reliable source for the article

Perry Teneyck. It came from Statsheet.com. (talk

) 21:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Great; thanks. Please see the

general notability guidelines to see what kinds of things will further help establish notability. cheers, ErikHaugen (talk

) 02:27, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

My World Tour

Please stop making all those links on the My World Tour page. If a song does not have a page of its own it is understood and does not need to be linked to the album. Candyo32 (talk) 23:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

My World Tour GA

I have ABSOLUTELY no idea why you nominated the article to be a good article. The tour's not even over, and the page has no information but tour dates, and therefore the article has quick-failed. I overly suggest that you need to check the critera Wikipedia:Good article criteria or check examples of good articles such as One Time, My World (EP), or Over (Drake song), because clearly you have no idea what a good article is. I apologize for having an aggressive tone, I am just stunned that you would nominate such a start-class of an article. Anyway, happy editing! Candyo32 (talk) 03:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Edits to Never Say Never

First of all, keep in mind that links should be at the chart, not at the chart position. And we spelling this out feat. ---> featuring. Candyo32 (talk) 01:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, ok. I was unaware of that, but now I know. Rp0211 (talk) 19:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Also please stop going on a linking frenzy common terms (such as countries) in music articles do not need to be linked. Candyo32 (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, I have been on Wikipedia for over seven months, and some things I didn't know were rules, etc. Where can I read up to know how to contribute correctly? Also, it seems that most of my edits on music articles are deleted by you. I am curious about that. Lol. Rp0211 (talk) 03:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Click on Help on the sidebar. And I am the main contributor to the Bieber articles, making most of them

WP:GA, currently seven and two are up for nomination. So that is why. Candyo32

23:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

Hello, Rp0211. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback.
Message added 20:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rollback question

Why did you use the rollback to revert this edit? I'm pretty sure that edit looks more like a good faith edit rather than vandalism. Since your rollback rights were granted, I'd advise to be very careful with the rollback button. Minimac (talk) 20:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I was editing this article and wanted to change the formatting to what it was before, and wanted to undo the change the previous user had done to better fit the article. I realize now I should have used the "Undo" action instead of "Rollback", which is used exclusively for reverting vandalism. Rp0211 (talk) 20:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

You should have placed this on hold rather than failing after a 39 minute review. The aim is to improve articles, not to just get them out of the queue. Please read Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles before undertaking further reviews. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Also, please remember to fill in the edit summary field when making edits. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for reconsidering reviewing the article again. Glad to see it all worked out. warrior4321 03:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not removed transcluded reviews from the article talk page. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 08:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't recall doing so. Could you provide me with the diff of said action? warrior4321 05:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

My message was for the user whose talk page this is. 18:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Then, you shouldn't have indented. An indent is a reply to the comment you are indenting from. See

WP:INDENT for more information. warrior4321

18:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of Halfway Gone

The article Halfway Gone you nominated as a good article has failed; see Talk:Halfway Gone for comments. I think you may want to extensively look at other GA's and other GA reviews before you attempt to improve this article or nominate another, or before you review another GAN. Thanks! Candyo32 17:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

GA Error

Hello. This is a message regarding your review of Woohoo. Thank you for your contributions but unfortunately i have reverted your edits. Your passing of the article was in good faith, but was extremely premature. In 10 minutes ive noticed over ten errors and thats just with a glance, i haven't even read the article yet. Im going to politely ask that you hold off on conducting any more reivews until you have read and fully understand all of

I concur. This is the second or third time that you have been questioned in your reviews of GA's and I highly recommend you check out GA critera and the MoS before you make another review or learn how to do one correctly. Thanks. Candyo32 04:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I deeply apologize for all of this. I will read both articles mentioned, to make sure I completely understand reviewing good articles, and wait for a while until I review another article. I want to let you both know, however, that I was acting in good faith when I was reviewing these articles, but obviously have missed important criteria when reviewing these articles. Thank you for your feedback. It is greatly appreciated for someone who is fairly new to Wikipedia. Rp0211 (talk) 06:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I had no doubt that they were made in good faith. Just make sure to read up and ask questions. Reading others peoples reviews of GA's and other GA's is also a great idea. Happy editing :) (CK)Lakeshade✽talk2me 08:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I had no intentions of bad faith on your part, becoming better and better on Wikipedia is all a learning experience :) Candyo32 14:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk:L.A.P.D. (band)/GA1

Oh, ok. I was using your template for my user page for now because I didn't know how to create one for myself. I will read up on it, but for now, it will remain here. Once I know how to do my own userpage, I will quickly get rid of the template. Thanks for the link! Rp0211 (talk) 01:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Everything on Wikipedia is released under a license that allows the editor to use your coding. Please the read below the Save Page button : If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. warrior4321 02:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Well of course I know that I'm not an idiot. It's just general etiquette not to use someone elses things, especially when I fixed the icons and fonts, etc simply for my to be unique to other pages. Candyo32 02:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

But, it's -not- yours. It's open for anyone to take and use, at their whim without your permission or content. That is the purpose of such a license. There are licenses which assure that the content creator has given their consent that the material can be copied. Fortunately, Wikipedia has a license which doesn't ask for the content creator to give their consent ; anyone can take anything off your user page and keep it their for as long as they wish. warrior4321 02:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Your going way to deep in this. It was just a simple conversation of respecting someone's wishes not to use their things. That is all. This was personal, it's not like I brought up a Wikipedia guideline where you can't copy someone's user page. Like I stated before it is just general etiquette. Candyo32 02:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem Rp, and if I came on as rude, I deeply apologize. As usual, feel free to ask any questions on anything you need help on :) ! Candyo32 03:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

I also edited your sub-pages, now your menu appears on all your pages. Candyo32 03:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Candyo32! :) Rp0211 (talk) 05:55, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem, and I added it to your workshop page too. Candyo32 19:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Your

GA nomination of Halfway Gone

The article Halfway Gone you nominated as a good article has failed; see Talk:Halfway_Gone/GA2 for comments. Among other problems, the references really need some work, and keep in mind the last comment I left on the review page. Candyo32 16:11, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I see now, I guess it is credible, I may not be sure though. I couldn't check background information behind the site because you didn't have it linked. But I assume it is fine. Candyo32 18:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I'll have to check on the image again. I think that the music video section isn't substantial enough to include an image. It is a fairly short section. I don't understand what you mean by wiki-link. You can link the work if it is a page for it. IF it is a publication leave it w/o italics so they will show up. If it is not a publication that use the italics symbols so it will not be italicized. Never mind about the remixes, I see that they are sourced. Candyo32 20:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

It has a good shot, be sure to proofread. Candyo32 20:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Justin Bieber awards

Thanks for contributing to the merge discussion at