User talk:Rrjedha

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gjilan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morava. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kokaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anamorava Valley of Binces

added a link pointing to Macedonia

District of Gjilan

added a link pointing to Macedonia

Jahi Jahiu

added a link pointing to Standard

Preševo

added a link pointing to Albanian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jbh (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please only mark edits that make no substantive changes to an article as minor. This would include things like spelling corrections. broken links, etc. Adding or changing references and adding or removing text would not be minor. The reason for this is many editors exclude edits marked minor from their watch list and will not see the edits. Thank you for your understanding. Jbh (talk) 18:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the
  Anamorava Valley of Binces page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help
  )

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jahi Jahiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Përdoruesi:Rrjedha for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jahi Jahiu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTK. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Abdullah Tahiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unedited Google Translate of

WP:MACHINETRANSLATION

, "an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you.--Zoupan 03:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rexhep Qosja.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.gazetatema.net/web/2012/06/27/nata-jote-eshte-dita-jone-gudar/rexhep-qosja-3/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See
  section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
  their content.

Actually, we already have an article about that topic. It's title is

Morava e Binces River into a redirect to the existing article. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:02, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT6.png

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT6.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT7.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT5.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT4.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT3.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MASAKRA NE KOMITETIN E GJILANIT.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm

My bad, didn't mean to do that

ping in reply) 14:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 17:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply ]

Help

--Rrjedha 20:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Why it has happened block my account. Vanjagenije 15:32 , 29 June 2015 ( UTC ) I have no information to confirm the two accounts . I 'm blocked by a 3 -day block master account . Mike V • Talk 17:02 , 29 June 2015 ( UTC ) --Rrjedha 20:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Binčs, Vitina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Binač

Why did you move it to Binčs, Vitina and then to Binça of Vitina? This is an undiscussed move, and does not follow name guidelines.--Zoupan 15:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Binač, Vitina" on 16 April? Why not simply "Binač"? Vanjagenije (talk) 16:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@Vanjagenije: True, though a redirect is in the way. Uncontroversial move to Binač after the undiscussed move revert?--Zoupan 16:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zoupan: That is what I would do, though I'm not sure if we are able to move to "Binač" for technical reasons, as there is certain page history at "Binač". Vanjagenije (talk) 16:13, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant technical move.--Zoupan 16:20, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Accept other of theater.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Accept other of theater.jpeg, which you've attributed to a copyrighted book cover by Nijazi Ramadani. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:38, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name and conflict of interest

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Rrjedha", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Diannaa (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rrjedha (Workflow)

My name as user flow in English koncodon with its many meanings as (Flow, Strom) (and one of these implications is as username .. or X-person, ... although considered that not a conflict interests as river flow, cash flow ... and which of these represents universal values ​​.. if my name as the user, the identity "Stream", pick up, or not in conflict with our policy name. Please note that I can not use a user name that represents the name of a form in Wikipedia identity and how the account is not allowed to be shared by multiple people, and that I can not advocate to protect my identit has many give a meaning no matter unlike other name . The modified name as the user to consistently maintain my identity as a user that already formed ... Moreover, I will answer your recommendations if conflicts of interest... differentiation, as a single person and am willing to contribute to Wikipedia impartially, to looking a Hi modification this name Workflow, although my name as a form of preserved identity Thank you. --Diannaa

Rrjedha talk 08:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTHERE, this user is a machine-translator.--Zoupan 08:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• @Diannaa: This user (Rrjedha) just moved his user page and talk page here. But, he did not change his username. Actually, the account "Workflow" is already registered by somebody else, and Rrjedha has no control over it. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored your user and talk pages to the name Rrjedha

• Rrjedha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Workflow (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hello Rrjedha. You attempted to rename your account to 'User:Worfkflow' by moving your pages. This didn't work, and I have moved the pages back. If you still want to rename the account, consider requesting it at

WP:CHU/S. Keep in mind that the name User:Workflow is already taken by another user, so you might want to select a different name. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop

Hello

WP:AN#Ban proposal for Rrjedha. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@EdJohnston: Would you, please, delete User:Workflow (again)? Vanjagenije (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

English language

Hi! Unfortunately it appears your written English is not good enough to write for English Wikipedia. Can I ask you to restrict your contributions to projects in your native language or other languages you know very well, please? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 01:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC).[reply]

July 2015

WP:GAB for how you can ask for review of this block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Daut Dauti

The article Daut Dauti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 03:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rrjedha&oldid=1216986630"