User talk:Rugbyhelp

Hello, Rugbyhelp, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

If you are interested in Rugby union-related themes, you may want to check out the Rugby union Portal. If you are interested in contributing more to Rugby union related articles you may want to join and WikiProject Rugby union. You may also want to add {{WPRU Announcements}} to your userpage to keep up with Project announcements. You may even want to add these pages to your watchlist.

Again, welcome!  -

I agree with the principle, an NRL player has no right on a shirt number over a season. It does however help to illustrate run-on sides, whether a player normally plays right or left centre, whether they are normally in the first XVII on a regular basis. It helps to flesh out the infobox was the main reason for doing it. Londo06 20:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many people have been working hard on getting a new infobox up and running and we would like to have your thoughts on the subject here.  CorleoneSerpicoMontana  07:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rugbyhelp - you wrote: I created the page Belgium national rugby league team (and didn't do too poorly I think) then saw on my watchlist: "(Deletion log); 01:21 . . Grutness (talk | contribs) deleted "Belgium national rugby league team" (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: mea culpa)" The page was not, in fact, deleted, but I was hoping that you could explain to me what exactly did happen.

Sheer coincidence - I'd made a page with that title shortly before you did. I found a stub called

When you have a minute, could you please take a look at the Sonny Bill Williams article. The statistics in his infobox look way off ... eg 49 tries from 35 appearances for NZ and 122 tries from 130 appearances for the Bulldogs. After going through recent edits, it seems that these stats have been in the infobox for quite a while. I assume you know of some website which carry up to date figures for rugby league players so if you could fix this that would be great. Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 04:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks champ. Jevansen (talk) 06:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If your going to delete the team that i had up there at least replace it with a recent team like the one who played england just last monthYoundbuckerz (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rugbyhelp, I've uncategorized Russia national rugby league team outside the category Rugby League in Europe because all national teams (including England and France) are only in the category of their country (in this case Rugby league in Russia, that is a subcategory of Rugby league in Europe). But if the agreement of rugby league wikipedians is what you have done, I accept this. Cheers. --Puigsacalm (talk) 13:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I hear you in that the 2010 squads should be retained, at least for now, but Gareth Raynor is in the 2010 squad, why has he been taken out?

Ymron (talk) 06:54, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about Gareth. I suppose that it is because the box was updated during the season but after Raynor's conviction. Unlike Nick, Gareth was not part of the "final" squad. Rugbyhelp (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Apple Pope has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

North American

WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:24, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

The file File:Rugby shirt.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The article Aston Bulls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relies on primary sources, trivial mentions and routine coverage (coach change or announcement of upcoming games) for sources. Found no significant coverage for the subject. Fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]