User talk:ST11

Precious

Five years!

Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... six years now, all the best with your studies! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I might have asked you this before and forgotten. Why did you not push Lyra to GAN? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@

t • c) 16:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

t • c) 04:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

enjoy the mountains! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

t • c) 16:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ḯ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 24#Ḯ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:36, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article

No evidence that it meets

the notability guidelines for astronomical objects. 1. Not visible to the naked eye, 2. Not in any high-importance catalog, 3. Never received significant coverage in reliable sources and 4. Was not discovered in 1850. SIMBAD

cites 41 references for this star, but all are just big catalogs and do not give any significant coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]