User talk:Samyem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Yomari

Yomari has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this article might represent a conflict of interest or otherwise seemed to be advertising. As such, it may not be appropriate for an article. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pathoumthong

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Proofreader J-Man 06:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


June 2007

introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Od Mishehu 11:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Speedy deletion of Toilet House

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Srijana's Rules

section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Yavoh 06:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Screenshot zk.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External map service links

Hello. You have been identified as having added or removed direct external map service links in articles[1]. There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:External links#Issues with inclusion or exclusion of map service links about which should be done, and some more opinions would be good to find community consensus. --Para (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Azam Amir Qasab

Hi. I redirected this page - the guy was already on wikipedia, but under a different spelling of his name. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of NEPAL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY

Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sam Barsoom 00:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ZK (framework)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ZK (framework), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article belongs to a software package that is technically not notable according to WP:NOTE.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

Grunt 10:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Codehaus

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Codehaus, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://codehaus.org/about/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on

talk) 18:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Codehaus

Article Wizard
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{

talk) 08:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chudleigh’s farm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dawa Steven Sherpa

The article Dawa Steven Sherpa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet the
notability guideline for biographies

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dawa Steven Sherpa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dawa Steven Sherpa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawa Steven Sherpa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Samsung DeX

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Samyem, thanks for creating Samsung DeX!

I've just tagged the page, using our

WP:PRODUCT
.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

the Teahouse
.

talk) 18:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Galaxy 4K TV moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Galaxy 4K TV (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:
This submission is not adequately supported by
independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has no references.
references
.

Do not resubmit this draft without references. You can ask for advice about references at

the Teahouse
.

Does not satisfy
notability
without references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Samyem! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Galaxy 4K TV

article space
.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

userfication
of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

here
.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 18:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Your draft article, Draft:Galaxy 4K TV

Hello, Samyem. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Galaxy 4K TV
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

request its undeletion
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Balendra Shah
(May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fade258 (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Balendra Shah
(May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Balendra Shah
(May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Usedtobecool was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is a lot more information in all the other drafts on this topic.
Either we need to show he was notable before the election, or wait for the election result. Short of that, he needs to meet
WP:NOTNEWS
.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upendra Mahato

Notice

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PlayOboe (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Upendra Mahato for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Upendra Mahato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upendra Mahato until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PlayOboe (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Upendra Mahato for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Upendra Mahato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upendra Mahato (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rath Butcher (talk) 10:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wangden Sherpa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Wangden Sherpa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 15:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Samyem&oldid=1224805495"