User talk:Savary34
Discuss the content, not the editor
RE [1], editor behavior discussions are done at admin boards, not article talk pages. This already was at ANEW (and was closed with protection probably since you continued to edit war with him, had you let the report play out the outcome may have been different), so I would hold off on further admin discussions right now. The content issue, of the section title should be easy to resolve on the talk page. And once a clear consensus is formed on the talk page, it shall also be easy to enforce. The moment you start discussing the other editor's behaviour there, he will reply and this will escalate and become long and convoluted, driving everyone else (who probably will support you on content here) away.--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 12:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Eostrix: Understood, thank you for this message.I will no longer comment on Belyny's behavior--Savary34 (talk) 12:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —C.Fred (talk) 17:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Blocked for sockpuppetry
Concern regarding Draft:De Perier family
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:De Perier family
Hello, Savary34. It has been over six months since you last edited the
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)