User talk:Sbakuria

Thanks for uploading

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pope.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 18:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hatch-bakuria.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  here
  .

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 21:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the problems you have with the article on the talk page before making such significant changes. The issue I have is that your prefered version of the article has poor formatting and appears to be largely promotional. The version I have reverted to is better formatted and better sourced (in my opinion), and therefore more appropriate for a Biography of a Living Person. If you have any questions or suggestions please present them on my talk page or the article's talk page. Thankyou. 141.163.196.7 (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could, if you wanted to, discuss the issues you have with the article on the article's talk page, then we can work together to solve whatever problems the article has and create something which satisfies everyone. 141.163.196.7 (talk) 01:35, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Up until now I have been editing this article as the fixed IP 141.163.196.7. I would like to make you aware of my intent to work on this article logged in as Rtdixon86 from now on. Before you try to edit the article again please discuss your opinion on either my talk page here:User talk:Rtdixon86 or on the article's talk page here:Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch. Thankyou. Rtdixon86 (talk) 16:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing advice

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PhilKnight (talk) 17:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More editing advice

As I've already suggested, before making any potentially controversial edits, you should establish

A Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct concerning you has been made. It is listed here: [[1]], and the discussion is here: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sbakuria. Feel free to make your opinions known. Rtdixon86 (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss

Please discuss the problems you have with the article on its talk page and resist reverting again. Rtdixon86 (talk) 15:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sbakuria. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents [[2]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rtdixon86 (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted ''under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later and Creative Commons Share Alike (CC-BY-SA), versions 3.0 or later, under CC-BY-SA, versions 3.0 or later, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL and CC-BY-SA, and note that you have done so on Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Rockfang (talk) 00:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the text on this page says, please do not edit the page until an administrator has resolved this issue. Thank you.--Rockfang (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you have reverted to many times,I have blocked you for three hours. Please discuss the issue, and do not just restore the apparent copyvio. Rich Farmbrough, 18:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Following your previous block, you've continued to post the same content without discussion, so I've blocked your account for 12 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 21:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to ignore warnings and requests for discussion. The information you delete seems to be reliably sourced. Your edits also lead to poor a format. Please stop this behaviour. I have also filed a notice here: [3] Rtdixon86 (talk) 15:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No more copyright violations from you. Not a single one. Your next will be your last with this account. This means no more passing off photographs, prose, or anything else as your own work when it is not. We are not so deperately in need of yet another notification about these BLP concerns that we are prepared to tolerate copyright violation along with it. Uncle G (talk) 04:20, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• You re-uploaded File:Pope.JPG with the same "own work" claim as before (despite your statement elsewhere that it actually is someone else's work) after this warning. That's it. Your editing privilges here are gone. Uncle G (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Tsotne Two.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the