User talk:Scetoaux/Archive 1

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Editor Review. If you need any help in the future contact me, as I also once had an RFA like yours. Cheers --Chetblong^{T C}

Here's how, RFA Closure. --Chetblong^{T C} 05:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I would suggests singing up for

admin coaching. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk

05:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

• Please read
  WP:Admin
• Please read the admin reading list.
• Generally, It has been my experience that it takes at least 3,000 edits in a variety of areas to learn policy and guidelines well enough to attempt adminship. Also, noms returning after an unsuccessful RfA should wait at least another 3,000 edits and 3 months before trying again. Noms need to show the ability to contribute a number of significant edits to build the encyclopedia.
• The Admin tools allow the user to block and unblock other editors, delete and undelete pages and protect and unprotect pages. Noms will therefore do well to gain experience and familiarity with such areas as
  WP:BLOCK
  to learn when to do these things.
• Adminship inevitably leads one to 1) need to explain clearly the reasons for one's decisions, 2) need to review one's decisions and change one's mind when it is reasonable to do so, 3) need to review one's decisions and stand firm when it is reasonable to do so, 4) need to negotiate a compromise. Admins need a familiarity with dispute resolution. The ability to communicate clearly is essential.
• My suggestion to any nom with < 1000 edits would be to withdraw and try again in another 3 months and 3000 edits. I recommend taking part in RfA discussions to help learn from the experiences of others. Many noms have found it helpful to obtain an Editor Review before submitting their RfA. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 05:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I have removed your comment from this RfA as it was already closed at the time you added it. You probably overlooked the notice at the top of the page. It's great to show your support for an editor whose contributions you feel are valuable to Wikipedia. Perhaps you would instead like to offer congratulations to Chetblong? You can find his talk page over here. Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Whoops. Thanks, I completely missed it. scetoaux (talk) (My contributions.) 20:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Are you sure you want to? I'd be happy, and try to be involved. Is there anything specific that you want to work on? Have you gone up for RfA before? Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 01:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I would like to do so. I can't put in very much time on weekdays, but on weekends I'm essentially free. I went up for RfA, essentially just to get feedback, but I didn't realize that wasn't exactly the best thing to do. In my request for coaching I stated that I have only ~100 mainspace edits, and less than 300 total edits, so I know I have a long way to go before I could ever be realistically considered for adminship.

My RfA scetoaux ^{(talk) (My contributions.}

) 01:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I would recommend an editor review at some point soon as well, they are quite useful. You do have a long way to go, but I'm happy to work with you. You may want to also look at this for some typical RfA standards. You're quite an enthusiastic new editor, and we're quite happy to have you on the project. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 01:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup. (I'm guessing you speak French by your talk page link in your sig?) scetoaux ^{(talk) (My contributions.)} 01:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I speak French to a degree. You don't need to use talkback, I'll keep an eye on your talk page for now. Have you done any anti-vandalism work? Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 01:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I've done some reverts, and just recently added a Template:Uw-npa1 to an anonymous user's talk page for an attack they made on another member. scetoaux ^{(talk) (My contributions.)} 02:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Would requesting rollback be a good idea at this time? scetoaux ^{(talk) (My contributions.)} 02:17, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I reverted it because I noticed Keilana had already made you a plausible offer. Sorry for any confusion. I meant to undo it, but my finger slipped. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 20:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the

Hello, Scetoaux. You have new messages at Chetblong's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.