Wikipedia:Editor review

historical reference.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump

.

Editor review (ER), created in 2006, was a Wikipedia process where editors could request other editors to comment on their edits or conduct, much like a voluntary

Editor Assistance were better venues. The need for RfA preparation was a bit more complex: other admin coaching

efforts in the past had failed. The best suggestion available for this was to seek out mentorship on an ad hoc basis.

This process was never very active—while requests for review always poured in, high-quality responses were uncommon. In 2013 and 2014, discussions were held to determine the status of this process. At that point, there were "active" review requests from as far back as late 2012 with no responses. An

Central Discussion

.

Given no successful proposal for restructuring ER emerged, it was concluded that the process was dead and should be formally closed. Open ER requests were archived and the filers were informed of the process's closure in the last week of May 2014. As stated above, while there is no Wikipedia process that directly replaces ER, some of the following may be of interest:

Wikipedia:Teahouse
Wikipedia:Help desk
Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests (deprecated in May 2021)