User talk:Scientio

This is not advertising, merely a place holder intended to help cross reference the various links to academic content supplied by Scientio. This link is written in a matter of fact way without hyperbole. I am happy to add references to the various academic papers that scientio, a research organization, provided free to the community. I notice that our competitors, for instance

Fair Isaac

are not deleted under the same terms. If it is ok to leave references to other data mining and research organizations then the case must be the same for Scientio's contribution.

Sorry, but it's just too much like advertising. Wikipedia is not a place for organisations; indeed organisations are forbidden from having accounts. It's a place for individuals, and for not worrying about wether one company is promoted over your own. The community as a whole decides if a link is acceptable; if you find one which looks dubious, please remove it! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: matches an existing company or group. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

• If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
• If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's
  dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators
  usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
• You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 15:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There has been some discussion over your username, as I am sure you are aware. Looking over your work, I can tell you are trying to positively contribute here. It's probably best to stay away from 'Scientio' related edits, as it will be construed as a conflict of interest. If you have any questions about policy, please feel free to ask. You're off to a good start, so thanks. the_undertow ^talk 21:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published,

notable

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic.

Explanation: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DARL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was:

independent, reliable, published sources

. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DARL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HighKing⁺⁺ 16:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Scientio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the HighKing++ 16:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello, Scientio. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:DARL, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hi Scientio, can you add a citation for your Thinkbase comment on knowledge graph? Thanks, – SJ + 15:16, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have done. It was 22 years ago, so there's not a vast amount of evidence left, but the trademark registration still exists in the US and UK. Note Transworld R&D was a majority shareholder in Science in Finance.

Hello, Scientio. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scientio. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]