User talk:Sengbe7

Hi there, I'm

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

]

Your draft article,

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Codman

Hello Sengbe7. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Mark Codman

".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Codman}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

At Somerville, Massachusetts, you described a person being Gilleted. Could you clarify? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC) Oops, it was a typo - should be gibbetted. Thanks Sengbe7 (talk) 21:49, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I suspect this will eventually make a good encyclopedia article, as it appears to be a significant historical subject. The problem is that the current draft needs significantly improved references. Each factual statement in the main body of the article needs an in-line citation. See

WP:INCITE

for details.

In addition, the http://boston1775.blogspot.com/ source is probably not a

WP:RS

. It is self-described as History, analysis, and unabashed gossip.... That's not what we need.

Please don't be discouraged by my declining the draft. Most first drafts get declined. I urge you to continue to work on this and research better sources. This should develop into a nice article with some work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Mark Codman
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sengbe7! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 23:34, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]