User talk:Sergiy Sheyko

Hello, Sergiy Sheyko, and

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nat Gertler (talk) 04:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Planetimer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of

WP:NOTABILITY

in article; Google results are a sea of sales sites, rather than anything indicating real notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 04:50, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sergiy Sheyko (talk) 13:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Madam/Sir,

Thank you for the notices, and of course, I’ve taken into account them.
This article is not about: website, my promotion or me; and in spite of I have closest connection with the subject to the article, it presentation way is neutral and unbiased, so it introduces only the main engineering principles of proposed device.
Moreover, this solution isn’t researching or scientific investigation, it describe an technical solution based on obvious and proven data, so I entirely understand and admit that any information presented in this article could get the further critics or different points of views.

Best regards,
Sergiy Sheyko

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planetimer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetimer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sergiy Sheyko (talk) 16:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mr. Gartler,

I agree that the matter of my article hasn’t enough opened notability except discussed on the forums. However, I believe it could be interested for the Wikipedia readers as the qualitatively new solution in watch industry, moreover, I admit all responsibility for authority and reality of the presented data.

Best regards,
Sergiy Sheyko

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Planetimer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetimer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has been added the reference to the revised and published patent in worldwide databese: en.espacenet.com.

Best regards,
Sergiy Sheyko 1:18, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Sergiy: Posts on here are not going to have any weight with regard to whether the page gets deleted. You will find a link to the deletion discussion on the article's page, and above on this page. Before entering into the discussion, I suggest you read WP:Guide to deletion for tips on how to handle the discussion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:43, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Category:Planetary watch, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 15:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]