User talk:Shadowasuka103

September 2016

reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 02:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

January 2017

talk) 22:47, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of video games notable for negative reception has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the
introduction
.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of video games notable for negative reception was changed by Shadowasuka103 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887803 on 2017-02-25T20:39:10+00:00 .

Thank you.

talk) 20:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

About your edit on List of video games notable for negative reception

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that after looking at your edit on List of video games notable for negative reception, I have determined it was not vandalism. I advise you to report it being tagged as nonconstructive. TheJoebro64 talk 06:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

October 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Becky G. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Loona, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]