User talk:TheJoebro64

Congratulations, TheJoebro64! The article you nominated, Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hog Farm (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

Hello again. As we have previously collaborated on article nominations, I would like to ask if you are able to leave any comments here at my FA nomination for High School Musical: The Musical: The Series. Any small amount of comments would be appreciated, but I completely understand if you are too busy or uninterested. Thanks in advance. SatDis (talk) 06:34, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SatDis, I'll try to take a look but I can't make any guarantees. If the FAC runs into risk of being closed just let me know again and I'll try my best to get some comments in. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 14:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, TheJoebro64! The article you nominated, Donkey Kong Land, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and thank you today for the recent Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts, introduced: "What do you get when you throw a niche-but-beloved late '90s franchise, cars, Legos, and infuriated fanboys into a blender? You get Rare's misguided masterpiece, Banjo-Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts. This honest-to-God attempt to innovate in a genre that'd stagnated outside of Mario ultimately did more to kill the series it was attempting to resurrect than it did to, well, resurrect it, but it's seen a bit of a renaissance in recent years thanks to its inclusion in Rare Replay. Nowadays, you're more likely to hear about how it was unfairly maligned and innovative, offering a massive amount of constructive freedom a full three years before Minecraft's proper release."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheJoebro64, and thank you for being an editor of Wikipedia! I am writing to you (as you suggested, I saw) about your revert of my explaining who Banjo and Kazooie are in the intro of today's FA. Not everyone knows, of course. While the article includes a link, in my experience not everyone cares enough to follow a link, that may lead to another link, etc. Instead, a one-or two-word explanation, the first time the term comes up, is helpful. The names do not make it clear (to the uninitiated) that they are characters, and to someone not familiar with the "franchise", there's a "hunh?" factor; that's why I explained. While saying that they are characters may be a little heavy-handed, some explanation seems called for. What about their being a bear-and-bird duo? It's a bit more specific, and less obvious. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unnecessary to call them "the characters". Maybe there's a better way to introduce them, but I think contextually readers will almost instantly deduce that they are characters. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 14:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was looking at the article for the "A Death in the Family" story arc. Firstly, I have to say, great work on it. You put a lot of effort into it and I'm glad it became a FA. What I wanted to ask, is how come Jason and other characters like Dick are referred to by their surnames rather than first names? I understand that this is common practise on Wikipedia with real-life figures (unless said figures are known by mononyms; like Adele). But with fictional characters - especially superheroes - they're usually referred to either by their codenames or first names, as indicated here. Shouldn't that be the case with Jason and Dick in this article? PanagiotisZois (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PanagiotisZois: I actually wasn't aware of those naming conventions. I'm not sure why I chose surnames over first names so I won't lift a finger if you change them. (I could get around to it myself but I'm preoccupied at the moment.) JOEBRO⁶⁴ 20:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
• Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
• FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
• TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
• Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.

The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included LunaEatsTuna, Thebiguglyalien, Sammi Brie, Trainsandotherthings, Lee Vilenski, Juxlos, Unexpectedlydian, SounderBruce, Kosack, BennyOnTheLoose and PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
Previous issue | Index

Project At a Glance
As of Q4

2022

, the project has:

259 Featured Articles 95 Featured Lists 10 Featured Topics

35 Featured Pictures 1,862 Good Articles 31 Good Topics

---

Content

Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements

Survey: How does WikiProject Video games determine character notability? Some news regarding the status of the newsletter

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • talk
  • Cleanup – talk
  • Peer review – talk

   

  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk
  • talk

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pizza Tower Steam Key Art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why are you adding an amalgamation of the ratings of Super Mario All-Stars to the article from Nintendo Power? The magazine did not give an over-all ranking like that, and combining their numeric rating into one overall one is against the rules of

WP:NOR outright states still constitutes "a meaningful reflection of the sources". JOEBRO⁶⁴ 15:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

It's not a meaningful reflection of the source of you state an average that is not implied by the authors.

WP:STICKTOSOURCE means when you should not go over what is implied. Any reader taking a glance at the article without investigating the citation would assume that's what the rating the magazine gave, which if course it's not. Could you show me where this consensus came from in the video game wikiproject? Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The relevant discussions I found were

WT:VG since the two discussions I found didn't have a ton of input though JOEBRO⁶⁴ 16:16, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for sharing these with me! I might bring them back up on the talk page as the previous discussions per what I said above and per

WP:STICKTOSOURCE as I feel like that potential rule was overlooked when the earlier discussions were brought up. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey Joe. I was just curious if you were still going to contribute to the discussion on averaging out scores as I posted on the Video Games WikiProject here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I started writing a reply but I've been a bit busy this week so I haven't gotten around to finishing and posting it. Should do it later today (the tl;dr would be that I think adding up the scores for publications who had multiple reviewers giving scores is fine but I've been convinced doing so for reviews that rated different aspects should be discouraged) JOEBRO⁶⁴ 14:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No rush, I just didn't want you to miss out on the discussion in case you had. Have a great weekend! Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your barnstar page reminded me I still owe you one:

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For all the funny and informative contributions to the WP:Top 25 Report. igordebraga ≠ 03:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Igordebraga: thank you! Means a lot. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 15:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How is 2011 Sonic CD a remake? Everyone says it’s remaster because it is estentially the same plot and gameplay just with better graphics a remake complete overhauls the gameplay which this doesn’t. NakhlaMan (talk) 00:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources describe it as such, and it was rebuilt from the ground up in a new engine. That’s different from a remaster. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 01:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Video Game Barnstar
		For massively overhauling Pizza Tower to the point that it barely resembles the revision from three days ago, but in a good way. I don't have a stake in the article aside from my previous edits to it; just saw the changes today and thought they were neat. AdoTang (talk) 00:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AdoTang: thank you! Glad to hear my work hasn't gone unnoticed. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 15:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GDRI uses comparisons of game code, as well as official photos, to prove Tose developed this game.

This article only references two opinion pieces from independent writers who are not close to the subject matter, and do not cite their own sources for their claims that Nintendo developed this internally. Raizen1984 (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See

WP:VG/S. The source you provided is not a reliable source. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 13:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The redirect Sonic Boom (Sonic the Hedgehog 2 mod) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11 § Sonic Boom (Sonic the Hedgehog 2 mod) until a consensus is reached. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 12:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pizzaplayer219: it was mentioned in a previous version of the article but appears to have been removed at some point. (Also it's a well-known hack and this was the first search result that showed up when I googled it so I don't know what on Earth you're talking about when you said you couldn't find any sources about it.) JOEBRO⁶⁴ 21:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Retro isn’t a reliable source as it’s a

WP:USERGENERATED Wiki). When I looked on google, I didn’t find anything related to this hack. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 21:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I never said Sonic Retro was a reliable source lol. I'm just not sure how you couldn't find anything about it. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 22:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide me with a reliable source then? As far as I know there are no reliable sources that discuss this hack. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 22:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if there are any RSs about it. It was mentioned in the article when I made the redirect, that's all. I don't know when it was removed or what it was cited to. I was simply confused when you said "after searching extensively on Google, I still don’t really know what this mod is" because it's a pretty easy Google search. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 22:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I must’ve searched it wrong. How about we

stop beating the dead horse and move on. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 22:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 204.132.81.138 -- 204.132.81.138 (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

This review appears to have been created by a user who did not intend to complete it, and by an unregistered user contrary to the instructions at

WP:GAN/I#R2. This review page has been deleted and the nomination has been returned to the queue, in its original position as far as I can tell. Another notification will be posted here when a good article reviewer begins their review of the article. Sorry for the inconvenience. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 00:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, I would recommend that you mind your tone. Wikipedia is a collaborative process, and replying to an article by undoing its creation with merely "no" is, by design, disrespectful.

The article has multiple reliable sources that discuss it in significant detail, including multiple articles specifically about City Escape, and multiple articles that specifically discuss how City Escape is the highlight of Sonic Adventure 2. It also has multiple instances where its creation and inspirations were discussed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for coming across as disrespectful, but I just don't see it. The article is primarily sources to listicles (

WP:ROSENBERG) and very few talk suggest the stage itself is a distinct topic from Sonic Adventure 2. I'm starting a merge discussion. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 14:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

The series finale has not aired yet. There's still 5 episodes to go. AutobioGraphix (talk) 08:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AutobioGraphix: Thanks for letting me know, I've fixed it. Though I will note there's nothing preventing you from editing the list yourself; anyone's welcome to contribute JOEBRO⁶⁴ 16:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

• Iazyges (1040) with three FAs on Byzantine emperors, and lots of bonus points.
• Unlimitedlead (847), with three FAs on ancient history, one GA and nine reviews.
• Epicgenius (636), a WikiCup veteran, with one FA on the New Amsterdam Theatre, four GAs and eleven DYKs
• BennyOnTheLoose (553), a seasoned competitor, with one FA on snooker, six GAs and seven reviews.
• FrB.TG (525), with one FA, a Lady Gaga song and a mass of bonus points.

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, PCN02WPS, and AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

Congratulations, TheJoebro64! The article you nominated, Sonic the Hedgehog 2, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that articles about Nintendo EPD games should be specified as "published by Nintendo", as Nintendo EPD is a division of Nintendo, not a separate company from its parent company; keep that in mind for any Nintendo-published games. STB (talk) 00:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spiral, there is absolutely no issue with the way it's set up now. You don't need to tell the reader that a Nintendo game for a Nintendo system was published by Nintendo; it's already obvious, not to mention that the infobox is right there. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 00:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Casual readers would not recognize "Nintendo EPD", as it is just a business division of the company that is only named in-house and is publically known as "Nintendo". Please don't reject all changes that do not specifically harm the article's importance. STB (talk) 00:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also I did not intend the edit to aggrevate other editors, it would be you aggressively reverting to be edit warring; we should discuss in a civilized way here and not revert anything until a consensus has been made. STB (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

edit warring. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 19:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I have your video game project on my watchlist. Keep at it! Panini! • 🥪 00:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Panini! Glad to know my work has a fan JOEBRO⁶⁴ 14:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PerryPerryD -- PerryPerryD (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

The article Pizza Tower you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pizza Tower for comments about the article, and Talk:Pizza Tower/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PerryPerryD -- PerryPerryD (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to see your comment on the merge discussion of Sonic the Hedgehog navigation boxes. It looks like you drafted and made the spilt of the navigation boxes, and I proposed a better box, wishing you to see whether it works better. Explorer09 (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheJoebro64,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The

WT:NPPR

when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at

AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed

, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at

draftspace is optional

, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own

WP:ARTIST

4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this
  short poll
  about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Hello TheJoebro64,

The

New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed

. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
• Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
• Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
• Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
• Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheJoebro64,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the

NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here

- it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet

WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more

, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Frontiers is not an open world game, It is a level based platformer adjacent to collectathon platformers of old. This is not a RockStar, UbiSoft, "Zelda Tears of the Wild" kind of game. This is a game taking 3D Mario design and making it its own"

This is what I said when editing the article. You responded as with what the sources say and therefor it is true. It is not. Sources are only using generic retoric and lingo as opposed to speaking what the game is on it's own terms. Even the developers have seperated open world from open zone for this very reason because of the collectathon nature of Frontiers, which I would argue is a greater implication as to what sonic frontiers actually is than the journalist who keeps generalizing. So i would kindly like it if you would revert the article. Samalik16 (talk) 17:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why are we using the percentage that critics recommend, and not the average score? MrGuyWasTaken (talk) 23:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See

MOS:VG. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 00:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello TheJoebro64:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2400 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-

• BeanieFan11 with 2582 points
• Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
• Epicgenius with 1518 points
• MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
• BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
• AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points
• Sammi Brie with 520 points
• Unlimitedlead with 5 points

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.

• Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
• Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
• BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
• LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
• MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
• Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
• Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.

The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

My changes make sense, stop reverting them. You are supposed to give a reason when you undo edits. 2A00:23C6:D584:5B01:F80B:2C48:1085:CDAC (talk) 17:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, your undo my edition, then I ask you why is this okay and can be on Wikipedia [1], but Dreamcast release in India, isn't okay ? I can understand that release dates for non-English countries like Russia or Brazil aren't necessary, but India's second langauge is English, so it would be great to have those dates here. Agonia09 (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See

WP:VG/DATE: Releases in non-English countries should otherwise not be included in the infobox, but if determined to be necessary to include, can be discussed further in the article's body. There's nothing significant about the Indian release to warrant inclusion in the infobox. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 20:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

hello My name is marisoft69 i wan't speak to My last edition in a infobox of Donkey Kong Marisoft69 (talk) 01:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello TheJoebro64, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 13:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1^{(The Garage)} 13:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Corvette ZR1: thank you! Hope the Christmas/holiday season is treating you well. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 15:20, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello TheJoebro64, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

—

Happy Holidays

, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—El Millo (talk) 20:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{

subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b

}} to your friends' talk pages.

Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), and Frostly (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year 2024!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello TheJoebro64: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year 2024!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello TheJoebro64: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShadowTheHedgehogSA2.png

Thanks for uploading File:ShadowTheHedgehogSA2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Robo Blast 2

Hello! This morning I started writing an article on Sonic Robo Blast 2 in my userspace. Since the current article title goes to a redirect, I checked the history and found it had some (long, meandering, and unsourced) previous revisions that you had reverted. I believe that there is coverage from a few respectable places to justify turning it into an article again, most of which are included in the article right now, though a couple of them aren't as in depth as I would prefer. Would appreciate your thoughts as you have experience in the area. Reconrabbit 15:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just patrolled the article @

WP:DYK. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@Reconrabbit: I'll try to take a look once I get the chance. I'm studying abroad this semester and have been traveling a lot so my time on Wikipedia has sadly been limited but I'll try my best to check it out. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 20:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's since been moved to Sonic Robo Blast 2. Reconrabbit 21:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
• Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
• MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
• Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
• Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
• voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiosity...

Which actor portrayed Batman the best? In your opinion. I ask because I've been on a Batman movie spree lately. Panini! • 🥪 04:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panini!, funny you ask, because I've also been on a Batman kick as of late. My favorite live-action Batman is probably Robert Pattinson, though I also really like Adam West and Christian Bale. In animation, Kevin Conroy, no contest. JOEBRO⁶⁴ 11:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Pattinson did really well as Batman, but when it came to anything that wasn't intimidating people/fighting I feel he did a lackluster job, especially with Bruce Wayne. That, or we just have yet to see more of it.

That's why I prefer Christian Bale, because he's the most rounded in all aspects of the character in my opinion. Panini! • 🥪 15:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

• Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
• Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
• Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
• MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
• Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Your Note on The Dark Knight

I just want to say, THANK YOU for proving my point on "The Batman" being redundant on the article for that movie. There was some guy who added "the" in excess and I edited it way back in late November into early December because it was driving me nuts and this guy wasn't getting my point on it being completely unnecessary.

So I removed all but like two uses of "the" as a compromise and I'm glad that you backed up my point further. I jumped through the hoops of making an account and editing articles just to correct that mistake, so it's nice that there's someone coming in to further prove my point. It didn't need to be there, and I only had two uses as a form of compromise to avoid that little editing war from escalating further. You're awesome.

Sincerely,

Mr. Redfield Mr Redfield (talk) 23:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello TheJoebro64,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

• GAs
  about radio and television;
• voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
• FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC
  and two GAs;
• Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
• Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on

gaming Wikipedia policies or processes

to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you today for Katana Zero, introduced (in 2022): "One of my favorite video games of the last few years has been this 2019 indie platformer, which blends the tone and themes of neo-noir cinema with fast-paced, insanely difficult side-scrolling gameplay and a killer synthwave soundtrack. Katana Zero was an intense labor of love for its creator Justin Stander, who developed the game almost entirely by himself over the course of six years. It was delayed repeatedly and switched publishers at one point, but was finally released in April 2019 to strong sales and rave reviews."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]