User talk:ShandraNicole123

Thank you for experimenting with the page

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Conor Oberst. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Josh3580 08:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to 2007, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ashadeofgrey^Talk 11:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Brandon Flowers, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ashadeofgrey^Talk 11:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Ashadeofgrey^Talk 11:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Blocked

Presumably you account has been compromised so I indef blocked it. The autoblock will temp block you for 24 hours after which feel free to come back. Note than vandalsim will see you reblocked. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 12:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

ShandraNicole123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

71.35.146.81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

vandalism only acount

• Blocking administrator: Theresa knott (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your

Review Me!) 21:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShandraNicole123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Someone hacked my account, I haven't even been on this username in a week. So what've I got to do to be unblocked?

Decline reason:

You are responsible for any vandalism that occurs through your account. In my search, I could find nothing other than vandalism from this account for the past month. -- Yamla 20:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.