User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

New message

Upside down Mr. Bigglesworth. Not impressed huh?

I've had it for a few months and I requested that you had it as soon as I was granted it. But the admin (who was a teenager) who was reviewing it wouldn't comply. I said you do a lot of revertion of articles from vandalism. Basically you click rollback and it reverts any edits made by the last person instantly evne if they have made ten edits. I said this would be very useful for you in particularly but he said something about you not always reverting vandalism and often reverting valid additions. He said it shouldn't be abused. Well I disagreed and think you have a pretty good idea of what should be kept or not. Perhaps you could ask somebody else as I feel it would be useful for you

$1,000,000? 14:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Less details required

In the RM article Too many role details and critics comments is detrimental too, can we reduce the number please , else it does not quite seem balanced, there is the film's article page for details of the roles Haphar (talk) 08:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New topic

Hello Shahid, my name is Diya. I am quite new here in wikipedia (just opened my account today :)...). Anywaz, I was just reading the

Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna page and i thought maybe i could add something extra- the thing that i want to add is that many people complain that songs didnt match the movie at all, but i felt that Karan Johar had actually placed the songs very well and had given subtle clues (for once in a Bollywood movie, the songs are actually carrying the movie along and they is a story within the song itself). So, i thought maybe i could write them down, so that people can understand and appreciate Karan's work and understand this movie better. I have the feeling you are the administrator (you are in charge of this, right?), so i was hoping to have your permission in writing on that page (it's not much and very interesting :). I wont disappoint you). Anywaz, i hope to hear from you soon. Take care--23 diya Talk
11:44, 5 March 2008

Hey buddy, how you doing? You were on an editing spree today. LOL. Anyways, I completely agree with you about the Rani Mukerji article. I personally didn't not Shez15 but Mukerji's page did have a lot of POV before and both of you had many conflicts. That's why, I only added some of the things back that Haphar removed in his edits. Thanks for adding some more back. So how are you these days? What is new? I haven't talked to you for quite a while. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 17:42, 20 February 2008

Yeah, I am currently back to university. I had the last week off but I am back to university again. Urghhhh!! :( Hey Shahid, did you see the poster of
IndiaFM doesn't have the period but that can be automatically ruled out. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk
18:24, 21 February 2008
I have been doing fine just a bit stressed about University. Nonetheless, I am getting used to the load of work. I do miss Wikipedia at times but once summer comes, I will be able to go on more often. I hear that Preity Zinta's article is again being reassessed for a GA. Anyways, I have some time now, so I will start creating the article on Main Aur Mrs. Khanna. Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 01:25, 22 February 2008
What do you think of the page? BTW, the user with the IP address 99.243.215.114 is me too. I didn't realize when the computer logged me off. LOL. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 02:55, 22 February 2008
Hey, thanks for updating
Kareena Kapoor's page and her awards section. I am so happy. :) LOL. Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk
20:41, 23 February 2008
Hey Shahid, thanks for your help on Kapoor's page. (Added note which I think is indeed important, only that emphasis makes me angry.) --> I hope you are not mad at me. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 00:15, 25 February 2008
Congrats on Zinta's article becoming a GA. Your hard work has finally paid off. All the best with your future projects. Look at Preity here. Despite very little make-up, she looks gorgeous. BTW, do you know what is she wearing on her right hand?? Furthermore, there is also some good news but I will tell you that later. What happened with Blofeld? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 20:25, 26 February 2008
Wow Shahid, I can see you are really busy these days... and so am I. ;) I didn't know what the thing was that is why I asked you. LOL. Well, it is too early to tell you about the good news but don't worry I will tell you soon. Hey, I remember that you told me recently that you saw Chameli. The last time I saw it, it was 4 yrs back. I just needed to ask you a question about her character in the movie. Do you remember if her mother or her uncle sold her to the brothel when she was young? Since Wikipedia has something and other sites have something else, I just wanted to make sure. Do you remember?? Thanks in advance!! BTW, do you know why Blofeld left? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 15:50, 27 February 2008

Zinta

Although I did not read the article lately, I quickly went through the GA assessment. And after reading the assessment, I feel it is time to take the article to FAC. This "western reviews needed" will not hold good in FAC. I mean, FAC has a broader audience, and this argument will not be entertained. Sandy has also hinted this in her comment in the talk page.

The review tells that prose is ok. Images are also ok. I did not understand that comment, "I continue to be unsure what kind of degree she attained". What did the reviewer mean? In any case, it's time for FAC I guess.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! That's fine (trying for the article after 25th). About myself, I am not really sure when I can be properly active again :( --Dwaipayan (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indian Premier League franchise needs to be added.--Dwaipayan (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your threats

And do not call me a sockpuppet. Be civil and behave. Itihaaskar (talk) 13:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am now stepping in here for unofficial mediation. Thanks, CWii(Talk|Contribs) 13:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Shahid, I am going to put a notice on ANI that you are using abusive language and are being uncivil. If you apologise i will not report you. You can read what you said here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AItihaaskar&diff=193026137&oldid=192349819 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itihaaskar (talkcontribs) 13:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please remeber to be
civil, Since they can be, oh whats the word, arrogant possibly but I know your a good editor so you know that :) CWii(Talk|Contribs) 13:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
In fact, you a sock puppet, and were blocked for that, and now you are threatening me. Feel free to report and do whatever you want.
Compwhizii - thanks for the note, I will take it into account although my message was not, by no means, an uncivil behaviour. ShahidTalk2me 13:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to write up an

SSP? CWii(Talk|Contribs) 14:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry friend, I didn't understand the massage. What do you mean? ShahidTalk2me
I asked if you would like me to write up a suspected sock puppet report. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 14:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, at the moment there is not enough evidence for a sockpuppetry case. If you can bring me more evidence I will be happy to submit a report. Sorry, CWii(Talk|Contribs) 16:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking links

Hi. It's not my place to go on at you so I won't. I'm not saying that all people in Indian film deserve an article but can you please be careful with the links you shut off. I see you unwikified the missing links on

$1,000,000? 15:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Oh and that section on Jodhaa I suggested about the Historical accuracy that looks good now. This is what I was thinking. Sometimes other editors need to learn the hard way at what is relevant to an article

$1,000,000? 16:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Well I've done all I can, its not my fault if you choose not to listen to my requests. I'd rather not have to spend time asking you, I just figured developing Bollywood on wikipedia was also important to you and I am surprised you try to curb its growth

$1,000,000? 17:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Didn't you read the messages above?

$1,000,000? 18:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yep thats what I'm saying. Those one time editors etc or cinematographers with two films etc or whatever should be quite rightly be shut off just leave the notable ones linked. I hate red links too!! -which is why I create so many articles. All I am saying is if you come across a page with a lot of red links in the future -please tell me and I'll try to create the missing articles if they are notable and block the rest. Best regards

$1,000,000? 18:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Exactly! Well said Mr. Shahid!! (I don't know your other name). This is exactly what makes it interesting and why I edit here

$1,000,000? 18:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Unbelievable. I started

$1,000,000? 18:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Ooooh baby yeah Ana María Ortiz, Miss Bolivia 2006

I came across this on my travels and had to start the article. Sizzling hot. I thought you might like to see this beauty.

$1,000,000? 00:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

:'(

Never mind me mate. What's up with Blofeld? :S Universal Hero (talk) 22:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for brushing up the introductory passage of this article. It needs finessing and your contribution is certainly appreciated. AppleJuggler (talk) 23:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blofeld!

What happened to Blofeld of Spectre? Basketball110 what famous people say 03:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kambakth Ishq

What Wikipedia is not
").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

sign your comments
with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

This entire discussion seems a bit long to be on a talk. If I were you I'd start an

REV LIMITER 18:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Priety Zinta --> GA

Hey Shahid,
Congratulations!

Priety Zinta
is promoted as GA! Keep up your good and sustained efforts, in achieving this status. Good Job! -
KNM Talk 02:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar!
The Bollywood Barnstar

Considering all the work that it took to get it there, you more than deserve this, Shahid. Great work on getting Preity Zinta to GA!--John Carter (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: By the way, I think if the issues raised at the GA reassessment are addressed, and that doesn't necessarily mean that you necessarily do everything they ask, but at least indicate why you didn't for good cause, I'm not at all sure that it wouldn't be a virtually certain FA. Having said that, I can easily imagine you're tired of that article right now, and might want to take a break from it for a well-earned respite. John Carter (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Special Barnstar
For Shahid for perservering with Preity Zinta's article continously making it great as well as being the nicest editor on the palnet Universal Hero (talk) 18:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I know that you'll rock starting from now, by creating more GAs. Please update them here. Universal Hero (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Finally, congrats for the GA-hood :) I have added the IPL Mohali franchisee info on the article, but am also not sure about the placement of the sentence.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Shahid, long time deserved!!! Sorry I wasn't here to congratulate you earlier, fed up with my talk page being a dumping ground for discouraging comments. I'll give you a barnstar when it reaches the FA status it has so long reflected. Hope you will still keep in contact and not be too busy to respond. Regards

$1,000,000? 16:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello friend! Thanks. It feels like I've been away ages. Well it wasn't just his comment -I'm tired of people trying to put me off and I think it is unneccesary to be cynical to others. My talk page is not a dumping ground for such comments and despite my warnings people still come and try to put me off the site!. I am very surprised that nobody has continued with the French town project much; it seems to have come to a stand still for whatever reason, wow I didn't realise people that some people were inspired by my work and was a factor in making them contribute. If in any way I do encourage other editors then this is a great thing and will make me feel like doing the best that I can for people. A couple of days ago there were five editors at least actively adding them. Amazing - people have started adding working on the french articles already in the last few minutes!!! That must be a coincidence surely?

It is always the content and potential of the site and the kindness of the editors I like so much on here that outshines any negative aspects of wikipedia. If only there were more editors like yourselves. I;m so happy for you that the dark cloud has been lifted off Zinta and she has been promoted. I am certain it could be an FA in a few weeks and then you'll be rocking!! But all in your own time, you probably need a breather from it.


I've just been looking at whats been happening. Wow Sarvagnya's work has been tagged as copywrighted?? Wow the irony in that!!

$1,000,000? 16:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

OMG. Is this still about the film and the related article??? Does he think wikipedia is a forum for historical debate? You tell him Shahid, You tell him!!

$1,000,000? 17:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Not if they are just views and there isn't any concievable evidence to justify it. A historical accuracy section is very useful but it can be tricky writing it so it doesn't appear POV or disputable. Perhaps you could write it as "historians such as .... have argued that ... was never married to .... as depicted in the film although there is little evidence to confirm this". Something like that perhaps. I think you both mean to improve the article but I agree, this editor needs to be aware of all the points you brought up and to avoid looking too much into it and to write it from a neutral and balanced neutral viewpoint e.g "historians have speculated" rather than something was something. Hope this helps and good luck amigo!

$1,000,000? 17:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC).[reply
]

A rather crude present from Baldy

In light of your recent endurance on wikipedia and dealing with horse manure, I feel this is well deserved. LOL!

The Crap toleration barnstar
For your outstanding ability to deal with the crap that you encounter and staminar at using the pooper scooper to make wikipedia a better place. How you tolerate such a strong exposure to ammonia (which is potentially lethal) I don't know but the Bald One is proud of your resistance to it. Keep up the strong resistence to it and in making the world a cleaner place!!
$1,000,000? 17:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Glad you like it, see what I mean about those niggling little editors. I have a teenage wrestling fan on my case called Nimi something or other who according to him no admin on wikipedia thinks anything of me or my work and there isn;t an admin who wouldn't delete my efforts. He has repeatedly hounded my talk page the last half an hour

$1,000,000? 19:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm now being told by him how "articles should be" despite the fact I've got clearance from the arbitration committee to mass create the french articles -but he isn;t aware

$1,000,000? 20:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

EXACTLY!! Thats why he mentioned it to insult me - because he had seen the previous question and answer on the talk pages - i think he was not happy with me telling the other editor it doesn;t concern me in the slightest that a boy is tagging my articles for deletion as we all know what the outcome will be, so he retaliated. I could certainly use admin tools at times, but becoming an admin would put me out of focus on concentrating on adding content, which I feel is the most important and what this site is about -too many people get put off from this. I don't feel I need a badge to establish status and would rather feel freer, although it would certainly give these trespassers more respect for me initally. I've seen relatively new editors rush to make them get around 10,000 edits and rush to do some good chores and then have somebody to request them for adminship. I'm not mentioning any names, but I've seen a couple of admins promoted this way within a relatively short space of time.

$1,000,000? 21:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Phew I think the French communes have all been started now for every department -36,000 articles with the exception of one department that somebody is working on!!! Its been some run and I;m glad several editors have been working at it, but now it is important a few editors combine to begin developing them from useless stubs. I remain optimistic that eventually they'll all develop fully, but they had to be started from somewhere, and raw power creating them was the best way to do it given the sheer content missing. I suffered for it though!! I created the box below to connect them all, now they need to begin development -fast!! We now have the whole country of France on english wikipedia, but they need serious development!! but better than missing completely. Check out the map France is a beast!!!

$1,000,000? 22:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Sure thing buddy I'll have a look now. I'm just in the middle of sorting out a huge mess somebody created with the Armenian towns. Nearly every one has the wrong coordinates and no map and I;ve used google at least a hundred times this afternoon to retrieve them from the various satellite map websites!! The person who created the mess is unwilling to correct his mistakes.

$1,000,000? 15:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

It reminds of me of my A-level history course and how important is was to weigh up the findings of different historians and to strictly avoid discussing speculation as fact.

$1,000,000? 15:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I watched some old 30s films like

$1,000,000? 15:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Something like The Encyclopedia of Hindi cinema

$1,000,000?
15:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC) It looks a great book doesn't it. The best thing I think to do is to search for something on Amazon.com -the best book seller on the web, write down a list of the best books you see and see if you can find them in the library. Often many of the books are very expensive so borrowing them is probably better. I know I've been looking for some books on Tibet and His Holiness the Dalai Lama but they are rather expensive. Other than this you can google search under books, and related books come up, some of them e-books. I started
$1,000,000? 15:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I know I remember some guy fussing before that

$1,000,000? 16:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

That book is a britannica one as well isn't it?

$1,000,000? 16:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

My god check out this. You can now install download a virtual earth from microsoft. Basically it is a satellite map which is now in 3D (this is what I have visualized for years but wasn't aware it existed yet. Anywhere on the planet you can zoom in and see places in 3d. Welcome to the 21st century. This is why I do so much work on geo articles as I;m certain soon enough wikipedia will have 3d maps of places and people can browse towns and cities through the streets, select a building and the article in cities like NYC and Singapore etc. Amazing isn't it. It only takes about 10-15 minutes to install. I'm sure soon enough this can be done for wikipedia and we can view articles on towns and monuments, bridges, rivers etc and see them in 3d on a map. This ia fantastic development

$1,000,000? 17:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Those books look cool. You're really happy I showed them to you aren't you!!! lol! I;m glad your happy. If it is a decent book perhaps you could add a reference or two in the Zinta article. I think it would be good to have a book reference or two

$1,000,000? 18:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Just been reading

$1,000,000? 20:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Anyway, have you ordered that book yet? If I was rich I'd send you the money to buy it as a present for you!

$1,000,000? 20:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

"There is a growing number of films made entirely in English." sounds much clearer I think. For Christmas I had this gorgeous book 501 places to visit - it is a mini encyclopedia on all the most beautiful locations in the world with stunning photographs. You know the Blofeld sort of rich cultural book. I love all those lonely planet guides too with all the photographs in. I'm certain that Hindi encyclopedia would be a stunning book also.

$1,000,000? 21:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Wow theres anothe rbook in the series called 501 must see movies. Thats looks great also

$1,000,000? 21:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I've been back a few days and already I've had several afds thrown at me and somebody telling me what a state one of my new articles was and to strongly recomend I db-author it. Why do they do this to me?

$1,000,000? 12:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

If i could speak Estonian I would translate into a good article.

$1,000,000? 12:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Thankyou. I just don't know why people have to be so rude and awkward. All they have to do is nicely ask me to try to expand something or tell me the article already exists but no they have to afd something straight away or poke fault with it. They just won't learn that any articles I have created are always kept and that they are wasting their time trying to get in the way. If I could translate from all these peculiar languages such as Estonian and Norwegian I would!!! Its only because I care about even coverage on here.

Hope you are well amigo mio.

$1,000,000? 14:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


Wikipedia word count is now over 986,000,000. In a week or two it'll hit 1 billion words which is monumental I think. i update the wikipedia main page every week-10 days or so and since Feb 20 when I last did it we've added 27,000 articles and 12 million words

$1,000,000? 18:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Check out

$1,000,000? 23:35, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]



Hey

Hi Shahid. I'm so sorry I haven't responded to you, but if you see my contribs, you'll see I've been a little busy with another matter! :) I will give you my full attention, which you deserve, as soon as I get the chance. ~ Riana 18:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breakthrough

I'm on the verge of a major breakthrough in Indian cinema pictures. I'll tell you more when its cnfirmed. Universal Hero (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the "breakthrough" is now on the verge. Expect a mass upload within the next few days. I've semi-acquired the rights of a journalist's personal photos, who has taken pictures with mainly North Indian (and some Southies). This person is awesome and has been shopping out with
Marks and Spencer in 1999. Wow! Universal Hero (talk) 22:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Kareena Kapoor

Hey buddy, I didn't say that she was ranked third for three consecutive years. I indicated that Kapoor ranked fourth on

Rediff's "Top Bollywood Female Stars" have ranged from the seventh to the third position over the past four years.[1][2][3][4]" I don't know!! Can you think of another way?? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk
02:35, 5 March 2008

P.S. Is it okay if we use scans from magazines to indicate the Filmfare rankings?? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 02:37, 5 March 2008
Hey buddy, I've been really busy with university and I haven't even seen any of the new movies that released in 2008. I don't think there are any good movies so far. LOL ;). I haven't seen Jodhaa-Akbar but I want to see it. Many people say it is really good. Have you seen it?? As for the sentence on Kapoor's page, does this sound good to you: "In addition to the yearly Filmfare rankings, Kapoor ranked third on the list of Rediff's 'Top Bollywood Female Stars' in 2007.[1] She previously ranked third, seventh and fifth from 2004-06 respectively.[2][3][4]." Maybe something along these lines could be added to the article. What do you say? So what is new with you these days? I see that you are not editing much these days as well. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 01:42, 6 March 2008
Well, I plan to watch it by this week or when I have time. LOL. Wow,
Kareena Kapoor and Salman Khan will be filming their film Main Aur Mrs. Khanna over there?? Anyways, it is currently winter right now here in Toronto. This year, winter was the worst. It has been so cold. You are so lucky to be in such a beautiful, warm place. Enjoy the outdoors!!! LOL. :) BTW, are you looking forward to watch Race? It looks pretty interesting!! Another thing... did you save the Kambakth Ishq page before it was deleted? I didn't!! --Bollywood Dreamz Talk
01:48, 7 March 2008
I definitely plan to watch JA. Don't worry!! LOL. I have been living in Toronto for 10 years. It is a beautiful city in the summer but in the winter, it is bitterly cold. :0 Why do you think that Har Pall won't release on the indicated indiaFM date? Anyways, what other forthcoming movies are you looking forward to watch to this year?? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 02:45, 8 March 2008
I will only be able to watch the new 2008 movies beginning April. My university is done by the end of this month and I am pretty happy that it is going to get over soon. LOL. :) I was thinking that once my University is over, we should both collaborate with Blofeld and work on the "top" Bollywood actors/actresses page. What do you say? Are you up for it? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 20:18, 8 March 2008
LOL Shahid, you misunderstood me. LOL. I wasn't indicating that we create a page known as the "Top Bollywood Actors/Actresses". No way in hell. LOL. We are not qualified enough to make such a list and as you said, many people will have different opinions. I was asking you if whether or not you first wanted to work together in improving the pages of [top] Bollywood actors/actresses' pages, such as
Shahrukh Khan, Salman Khan, Aamir Khan and etc, and making them into a GA. If not a GA, at least improving the pages from what they currently look like. From there, we can go an improve the pages of other Bollywood actors' pages. Like that, [with me, you, and Blofeld] most of the Bollywood articles would improve a lot. That was what I was asking you. Not the other thing. LOL. So what do you say?? Are you up for it?? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk
02:56, 9 March 2008
Shahid, did you save the Kambakth Ishq page before it was deleted? I didn't!! --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 16:27, 11 March 2008

LOL... Shahid.. Now this will be very interesting. It looks like the top two Khan's along with two leading ladies of Bollywood will be facing each other. (Shahrukh Khan & Preity Zinta vs. Aamir Khan & Kareena Kapoor) BTW, what is all this?? Since I am not a cricket fan, I don't get all this. LOL. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 01:49, 12 March 2008

Shahid, I know that you saved the page for Kambakth Ishq but did you save the page for Main Aur Mrs. Khanna? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 17:00, 19 March 2008
Could you be so kind to ask them to do so?? I don't want to edit everything again. Plus another use created the page again, which was deleted by User:Girolamo Savonarola. Thanks and regards. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 17:09, 19 March 2008
Hey Shahid, it's okay. You don't have to ask an administrator to restore it. I have nothing to do right now so I will start cleaning up the article. LOL, I know. I don't know why but these things can't be consistent. LOL. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 18:01, 19 March 2008
The film just began filming today that's why I expanded the article. If it didn't begin filming yet, I wouldn't have done so. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 20:13, 19 March 2008

Bollywood in Peru

I notice you deleted an edit on

Bollywood that claimed popularity in Peru. A google search on "Bollywood Peru" gives over 6000 hits so it would seem to be a significant phenomenon. I have replaced a wikified version of the original edit. Fanx (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Whenever anyone talks of international popularity... and then adds a country name to it, I'm reminded of this. Don't mind me Shshshsh, just dropped in to say hi. Ssup, how've you been? -xC- 23:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
lol, absolutely... we had to discuss things line by line back then... colourful times ;)
heard zinta's up for GA again? hope things work out better this time... :)
welcome half a dozen new users today :) I'll be getting back to editing as usual from tomm (Y) -xC- 00:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey!

(continuing here)

thats cool, I just saw it got relisted as GA! congrats!

hey btw, did you add in the NYT articles and BBC article that Tony found?-xC- 00:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sigh, such a debate over stacked refs... i wonder how many mimnutes were wasted over discussing something so trivial... :S-xC- 00:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rajiv

Check google if pictures/sources of this RAJIV and Ash are on! and if not send a warning. --~*~Lil'GKhanster~*~Take Care & Live Life (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No but I've read on google she dated some model but not exactly this guy called Rajiv maybe somebody was mistaken or just wanted to vandalise her page... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil'GKhan (talkcontribs) 00:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Picture = [[1]]... maybe but the guy is white I think maybe Matin Henderson or something
Found anything I know it is about that Bride and Prejudice but it seems real and alot of forums and sites have stuff about them hooking up or something...confused.Lil'GKhan (talkcontribs) 00:25, 6 March 2008
I think you didn't get it...[[2]] see this one they went out to some place together I think.--~*~Lil'GKhanster~*~Take Care & Live Life (talk) 00:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guessing

I'm guessing you think I'm just some kid???...I'm not!Look to say you may know alot about Ash...There is seriously no doubt about it:). --~*~Lil'GKhanster~*~Take Care & Live Life (talk) 00:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And no I can't create a templte right now.--~*~Lil'GKhanster~*~Take Care & Live Life (talk) 00:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are aware but this article up for an FA.

$1,000,000? 13:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi! Nice to see you reviewing Mr and Mrs Iyer. I read the article today only, and thought to give it a try for FAC (as I have some time to spend today :) ) I shall try my best to work according to the FAC comments tonight, as I am not sure to have much time later!!! And I request you to lend some help. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At first glance, hindisong.com does not sound to be reliable! However, the thing that is used from that site is an interview with Sen. The reliability of the source often is weighed on the context. IMO, the interview will be considered as reliable. Let's see if someone opposes it. Same goes for myBindi.com. Where is Dishant used?--Dwaipayan (talk) 16:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a fan? Universal Hero (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

K, more later. But first major uploads :))).. Universal Hero (talk) 00:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you put the phots i have uploaded on their pages. A bit late in London. Cheers Universal Hero (talk) 00:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Plus, one for you [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Universal Hero (talkcontribs) 00:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, heard of the new film with him and Aish/Abhi...should I start a userpage/aerticle now..? Universal Hero (talk) 23:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Aishwarya Rai:My addition was well sourced. And true. Why did you del itAjjay (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

It is not religious, it is superstition. I think people reading about celebrities have a right to know that they are sometimes hypocrates too. She slept with men before marriage and now she acts like sati savitri . I am not being crude but i thought this information(her marrying a tree) is important. i am not going to make any more edit to her article, afterall my opinion may not be universally accepted(even if it is true) ThanksAjjay (talk)
No way!!! I just love her body!!(that's the reson she is famous for) It is her personality that i find depresiveAjjay (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The

sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

This you should run for. Definitely.-xC- 14:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sharukh Khan
pic

Hi. You removed the pic Image:SRK in Don - The Chase Begins Again.jpg on this page saying that it is a copyvio.. The image page says "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed." So, can't we use this on the SRK page. Anshuk (talk) 19:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image id a film screenshot or just a wallpaper (as it can be seen) - someone uploaded it with false license, it needs to be deleted. ShahidTalk2me 19:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Can you teach me how to mark this image for deletion? I am curious. Thanks. Anshuk (talk) 20:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The tag you placed on the image page is OK. You can also see
Db-imgcopyvio}}. ShahidTalk2me 20:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks for your support.. I think now you can go and vote for removing this image.. Anshuk (talk) 20:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Silence of the lambs. ththththththt!

Do you like editing without speaking to anybody? Why have you stopped speaking? PLease try to liven it up a little its boring without having you to chat to!!

$1,000,000? 19:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I miss having the old Shahid to speak to!!! I thought you said you'd keep in contact?

$1,000,000? 20:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I thought you had got fed up with me. I sent you a few messages to which you didn't reply so I thought perhaps you wanted to stay away. Things can get pretty dull without having nice friends to speak to on here, How've you been? Enjoying the sunshine in baking hot Australia? Taking a koala for a walk lol? There was a programme on BBC 2 the other night which was devoted to Indian culture It started about 8.00 and finished at 4 am . I watched a good deal of it. There was everything on music, poetry etc and inspiring young people and also there were young Indian actors auditioning for parts watched by Johnny Lever and several other actors. I have found a gorgeous picture of Bipahsa clutching a goldfish bowl whilst underwater -I have it for my screensaver. Google her and you;ll see it at bollywood village.com.

$1,000,000? 20:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I;ve been pretty busy sorting out African cities. My edit count is going sky high 132,000 now.

$1,000,000? 20:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Have you seen this image of Zinta as a cute baby?

$1,000,000? 20:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Those are lovely articles well done!!!!! I am amazed how many missing articles on important subjects that are still missing. How come nobody started that film director article before?? How come you know what work I;ve been editing? -lol you;ve probably seen my name in the recent changes every second making the widescale categorical and infrastructural changes I've been doing sorting out the frickin mess that is africa on wikipedia. Some day Africa will be dominated by my evil organization lol!

Any good Bollywood releases of the last few weeks?

$1,000,000? 20:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

My mum auditioned me for a

$1,000,000? 20:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Well I have been pretty busy but I always welcome a visit from your good self to stop me from falling asleep. Unfortunately editors with personality like yourself and Rahul are few and far between. Any good Bollywood releases over the last few weeks?

$1,000,000? 20:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

The filming locations for Tashan looks interesting. As you know I very much love

$1,000,000? 21:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Do you mean debut?

$1,000,000? 21:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

That sounds fine then my Dear Watson.

$1,000,000? 21:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

well first release or first appearance in 2009 doesn't seem much difference to me. Nothing implies that she has suddenly become a director. I don't know why anybody picked holes in that. Yes I've had the impression Zinta is pretty smart and business wise for some time -perhaps she could help me set something up to get rich perhaps?

$1,000,000? 21:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Well thats the superpower of these Bollywood stars ; they are magnets to investors and commercial enterprises and being associated with a name like that brings in the dough. Look at David Beckham -global advertising brand as big as Coca Cola and McDonalds. Companies go crazy for these people. David and Victoria Beckham hands down are the most hyped couple of the last 30 years. How they've got to where they are is a miracle.

$1,000,000? 21:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I know its time it was put right. I;ve just managed to cock up my internet browser so everything is bold and huge and I've lost part of the task bar which I usually hide -I;m stuck with it and can't figure ou how I did it lol!!

$1,000,000? 22:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I see they deleted the Amitabh image too now despite having a flickr agremeent. We can't even get a permanent one for SRK.

$1,000,000? 22:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

This OK now. I'll speak to you tomorrow OK? Saludos amigo . Nice to speak to you again

$1,000,000? 22:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

You told Blofeld Emma Watson isn't comprehensive

So do you know major content and sources missing from the article? Ultra! 15:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not very familiar with the topic, and I did not literally mean "not comprehensive", but that the article is not really a complete FA worthy (for several reasons). Also considering the existence of better articles than this one, which deserve to be promoted to FA status, but are not. But it's only my opinion. It doesn't matter, it's a long story. I hope you are not offended. Are you one of the main contributors of this article? Regards, ShahidTalk2me 16:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shahid and Vikrant. I believe Vikrant, Shahid is referring to the amount of detail in the article which is my view is too short to be an FA. Of course it is well referenced and fairly well written it's just for me the content isn't there and detailed enough for that I would consider the material for an FA either but that also is my view.

Yes I've been up the

$1,000,000? 19:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes it was great -its merging into spring here and getting warmer and getting gradually lighter in evneings -always a sign summer is coming! I've allocated some time to Italian cinema today -I get dizzy headache when I see the red links and missing films in the filmographies. Literally 99.5% of all articles are missing. I wonder what it would take to get them all onto here and all of them written into GA class articles. 500 years?

$1,000,000? 21:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I was kidding lol, it would take centuries to do that lol! But I can certainly try to fill in the picture a bit when I have got some time. I reckon in terms of decent content or potential articles that could be written into beuatiful articles if enough sources were found and sheer amount of missing films and cinema characters has to be France and Italy. Right from the early twentieth century there are truckloads of missing articles.

$1,000,000? 21:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Unfortunately there are only a handful of editors who have developed Italian film on here and I don't know what has happneed to them these days. Rohmerin rarely edits anymore I don't think, and my old amico User:Attilios the Italian who also shares my love of Italian architecture and art I haven't spoken to him in ages. Which is frankly not good enough given the world reach of wikipedia. But as you said before most normal editors only edit the films they have seen and most of the people likely to have seen these films are Italian and work on Italian wikipedia. I;m different in that I want to increase my knowledge of films beyond my knowledge and expand on what I have seen and in more detail.

$1,000,000? 21:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello!!! friend!! How are you? I've had quite a few days of editing!! I'm feeling a bit lazier today

$1,000,000? 13:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Sounds good. I wonder how many articles we now have in total on Indian cinema -including all films, actors, directors, playback singers, choreographers etc.

$1,000,000?
13:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Thats good but the proportion of higher class articles is rather low. For the whole project 2000 FAs out of 2.3 million is pathetic. But its not surprising considering the high number of very good articles "objected"
$1,000,000?
13:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Prime example look at Emma Watson FA and now check out
$1,000,000? 14:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

All it needs is referencing and condensing a little

$1,000,000? 14:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hahahah see this -what an amazing cooincidence I linked these two peviously on my talk page. LOL

$1,000,000? 16:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

LOL its funny as I'm always take the mick out of Il litt' Kim Jong Il and then somebody places us side. Its probably because he is the closest thing to Blofeld living today.

Its suddenly gone very cold here -its supposed to snow this weekend - and it was just getting warmer too!!! I can't believe it is Easter already -Christmas felt like yesterday doesn't it!!

$1,000,000? 17:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes you are a Jewish family then? I wasn't sure if you were Hindu - what is it then your father is Israeli and your mother Indian, is this correct? My grandfather and two of my aunties look very much like they are from Israel, you can see the Jewish in my dad also, he had black hair when he was younger (now grey) but has blue eyes (and a typical middle eastern moustache too lol).

$1,000,000? 17:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes his middle name was Reuben and he looked exactly like a rabbi lol (as an old man)!!! Almost sterotypically so. He died 15 years ago but nobody seems to know much about the Jewish side of the family unfortunately. From what my dad told me he thinks it was my great great grandfather who emigrated to France from the eastern europe/middle east and married a Hugeunot French woman. They later moved to London. The french and jewish ancestry is quite clear on my dad's side of the family - incidentally his middle name is Deland which is obviously French and an extremely rare name in the UK.

On my mums side I have Swedish and Scottish ancestry, this is also obvious with how I look anyway. On her side most of the people are tall with fairer hair and skin and blue eyes. It is indeed very interesting tracing your family. I've seen some British celebrities like

$1,000,000? 18:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I haven;t unfortunately.

$1,000,000? 18:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]


Mr. Nocturnal huh? Yeah I must admit I'm more of a night person too I really hate the mornings in the winter. I always find I am at my best mid evening time is when I usually peak in the day. If I was living on my own I'd probably get a night job. You'll probably be looking to enroll at a uni won't you? Any idea what career you want to do?

$1,000,000? 18:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Which awards do you mean? In general? Usually the director picks it up and has his name written down I think , but often they include both. LOL I;ve just started an article on a kiwi lesbian painter

$1,000,000? 20:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

No its producer I think that is given the most attention. The director is for director

$1,000,000? 20:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Adminship

I tell you what I'm getting sick and tired of not having admin tools. Its ridiculous that I don't have them. Some of my flickr images I uploaded now have been tagged for deletion in the commons, Riana is now doing little to help because she is always busy, and i tag my own articles for deletion it is days before somebody sees that I might have some idea of whether the places exists and eventually deletes it. If I had admin tools I could do thing a LOT LOT more quickly and effciently. Its doing my head in not having the ability to do certian things when I clearly am more active than most of the admins on here

$1,000,000? 14:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Oh its not vandalism I am concerned about in this respect -I have roll back which is the only tool I have. Its trusting me to sort out articles and to make flickr agreements. Imagine how many agreements i could quickly make if they just let me contact people at flickr and authorise clearance. I sick of waiting weeks and not getting a reply from the commons and then getting a message from some commons editor who only logs into the project once a week that my images have not got the ticketing, when I could have it OTRS ticketed the minute I receive permission. It is seriously inhibiting how productive I am particularly with images. I have done tens times more than many admins on here to coordinate this project and I find it a bit silly that they can't give me the authorisation to do things which will be very beneficial to this project

$1,000,000? 15:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

I wouldn't mind becoming an admin if I was allowed to continue as I have been before and not feel under any obligation to patrol vandalism or recent changes or continuously attend wiki councils or whatever. If I just had the tools and could continue editing on what I feel is important -actual content and occasionally intervene or whatever where I need to this would be best. But something tells me all those niggling editors who I have run into in the past would oppose it and find several examples of where I have been in their eyes "uncivil" and I'd end up looking foolish. The Sravagnya brigade for one would oppose straight away.

$1,000,000? 15:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Well I'm sure most people would support, some probably even strongly but all I ask for is the ability for people to trust my judgement with deletions and images with flickr. I don't know if you have noticed but in the new pages because I am not an admin my new articles have to be checked like a beginner whereas admins some with 1/15th of my edits have their articles automatically patolled as if they were a superior creature!!! I'll see what John thinks when he returns after the Easter break and whether somebody could think about giving me one or two tools extra

$1,000,000? 15:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Perhaps but I don't want to get bogged down with wiki councils and well... administration. I'm not here to administer people, I'm here to enhance this freakishly large site beyond belief and build something never seen before. I would be last person who could careless about "abusing" his admin rights to block enemies etc, so if they just gave me the tools it can only help. Personally I think the fact I've created almost double the content than anybody in the history of wikipedia (and 134,000 edits) should account for something

$1,000,000? 15:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Well the work i do on wikipedia - stubbing en masse, recategorization, tagging, template adding etc, with geo, film and cultural articles maximizes my edit count probably more than any other subject on wikipedia so its just a figure. If only edit count equates to pounds or dollars!!!!

$1,000,000? 15:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

User page

I've been reading over your user page and I find some of the commentary on Indian cinema interesting. A lot of it I agree with: Manisha is a great actress especially in those more sullen less glamorous roles (Bombay, Dil Se) although her skill even kept me watching Market and Escape From Taliban *shudders*. But really you like Karisma and Preity? Preity was fine in Dil Se because she was sort of an annoying foil to Manisha. She was better in Kal Ho Naa Ho... maybe because she wasn't right next to Manisha which will obviously make her look bad :) I'll have to watch Fiza.

And I just noticed you listed me on your page :O That's nice... but, I'm not a good editor. Best work I did was the grunt work of film infoboxes. Zora on the other hand... she was a great editor and it's sad that she completely left... :/

I hope you're doing well, gren グレン 20:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholder

I've noticed on certain articles that the placeholder image seems to encourage uploading fair use images, which then have to be deleted as copyright violations. ALL articles can use images, so you don't really need a placeholder as a "request". Gimmetrow 14:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holi

Hey buddy!! Happy Holi!! How're you doing?? You have been really editing these days!! LOL.. =) BTW, have you watched Race yet?? --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 21:50, 21 March 2008

HAPPY HOLI!!

Have a great HOLI! Hope you're coloured for the next week :D

Have fun,-xC- 22:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

one of the best Wikipedians ever :D

sorry for the late reply bro, just wanted to wish you a very happy Holi aite, and keep on being the best :D take care =] Ashiwin (talk) 14:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]