User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 22

Remember to credit the copyright holder of the image. Thats the only problem I see

E.g State Copyright is owned by Warner Bros. Pictures 2002. Given that you're usinig a copyrigted image you still need to acknowledge the owner of the image. Imagine somebody was using a photograph you took, you'd expect them to acknowledge you wouldn't you?

I wouldn't worry about it. Why do you think somebody is going to start questioning neutrality now? FAs don't pass without going through strict requirements and you can guarantee that if the neutrality issues hadn't been sorted when it passed FA it wouldn't have passed. If an actress is particularly successful and the reviews genuinely reflect the critical response to a performance in a film rather than cherry picking then this is perfectly appropriate

Just keep a link to it on your user page or something if you feel it may be required.

Of course it is. Shahid surely you know that they pick up on every tiny detail at FAs. Do you think it honestly would have passed if it had all these flaws you seem to be seeing?

LOL I've seen the CROC clip how many times now?

LOL yes. The film looked early 1980s though. I thought it would have been earlier than '88

Sounds like a good un. Mm I wonder if there are any online reviews of it?

I knew you'd like Lawson. Its funny but Lusardi is sort of an opposite, a bit slutty looking lol but I find her sexy. I have a few of the Bollywood people on my watchlist but I everybody seems to beat me too it in regards to vandalism

Hi Shahid! How are you? Yes I definitely intend to renominate Pather Panchali in FAC. However, I don't have the time to follow an FAC properly. Evein the last nomination I could not work and respond properly to the FAC suggestions. And with Tony's oppose on prose, it needs really good copyediting. Some works are being done, but prose needs much more. That's the problem.

The first one is probably best. I've replied email

It looks fine. I;ve responded email

Wow Megan Fox thinks shes the new Angelina Jolie? To me Megan Fox looks like a perfect female action hero. She looks mean doesn't she?

Yes theres not many people who've got that kind of chiselled looks. Tends to be only action hero types doesn't it, the Jolies and Brosnans of this world. Black hair and blue eyes is a killer combination in my book.

Hehe I've just been watching Nigella. You;d be amazed how many double entendres she uses LOL. I counted 13 in the half hour programme. Man shes sexy. You;d have to see once of her cookery programmes to know what I mean, the way she flirts with the camera. Hey talk to me, nobody speaks to me any more, I;m too evil!

Hey I am!! It takes two to tango LOL!! Yeah back in May my talk page was the 27th most edited page that month on the website!! 27th out of 9 million odd in total! Virtually always when I log in there is a message but of late it really seems so quiet! How are you my friend?

Can you believe that

Actual length of course is not of primary importance. It is whether or not the article gives a sound and full understanding of the subject and is as informative as possible which generally means that the article is of a reasonable length. I don't know what sources exist for the article, but I'd imagine that article could be a lot more informative and it should at least have some fleshed out paragraphs on the aspects of the magazine in a way the guidelines to literature articles have on here. It would be like a film article being up for an FA with only a plot and a few sentences on its release and saying sorry, no other information is available for this film as an ezcuse for its lack of content.

What are you talking about???? "Please don't call me "self-obsessed", I find it extremely offensive"???? LOL where did you get that from?

Shahid you're alarming me. What do you mean? When has anybody ever said you are self-obsessed??? When was the last time I talked to somebody about you??? I completely do not understand why you suddenly left me such a strange message?

Just stop making fun of me in front of other editors???? Shahid really your're scaring me. I don't know what you mean?

Shahid that not funny doing that online. Its never easy communicating online anyway but I found that very weird.

Not stressed, just find it a bit disturbing that many editors would support something so brief thats all. "Wikipedia is all about content". LOL if you are bored go and expand some of those film stubs!!! You shouldn't be bored on wiki, theres too much to do!!

OK it was just weird timing thats all. If you want to amuse me, best to avoid something where it appears we have suddenly lost a friendship for no apparent reason. Draw me a picture of

Sure I'll, put it on my watchlist. I gather you noticed that I have some of the other articles on there too and have beaten you to reverting it first!

Well???

Yes I;ve been to Cornwall a few times. I love it. Ever eaten a

Yes, fond memories. I remember also when we used to catch a boat from

There we go

Thanks. Oh and of course the destubbing of

OK I'm going to start

I;ve translated it but have somehow messed up the referencing so the bottom section is missing. Can you see what the fault is?

Yep thats all it was. I've DYK nominated it as "DYK that the Cathedral San Nicholas was built after the original church was believed to have been occupied by evil spiritis" or something like that. At present I'm creating about 30 new categories to reorganize Colombian cities. At least when everything is in order I can begin to develop the stubs and know where I am. 700 articles in one category is too daunting!

P.S did you hear that John Carter is terminally ill? Thats why he hasn't been here. I do hope it is nothing life threatening

Howz this for a DYK tagline:

If the link is dead replace it, Why is it I always respond to your questions as soon as I can but when I ask you what you think of a thread you don't reply....

I asked you what you thought of the DYK tagline above, complete with picture to go with caption. I thought it was quite a sombre one!

Don't worry, I thought you might have seen my work on

Well you need to replace the dead link. Try to find a suitable replacement that links to it somehow even if not directly. I think I'll leave it for a DYK on Xalapa actually. Much of the other info was from spanish wikipedia which wasn't referenced. Why is it that most of the other wikipedias really don't seem to care about referencing!!

I know. The thing is so many people slag wikipedia off for being inaccurate or written by a bunch of kids or whatever but if the text is referenced then they can verify most of the information themselves which is the good thing about it. In many places wikipedia is actually more neutral than many of the biased publications on people or events by "scholars". The problem is wikipedia has always been a project to "build" an encyclopedia rather than seeing a completed version like Britannica so it is inevitable that there will be a huge inbalance in quality. Some of the articles I've seen on German wikipedia make the English equivalent look pathetic but in other areas makes some of the other wikipedias look worse in terms of knoweldge detail. Overall I still think english wikipedia is the best, but its a shame we can't have more people who take stubs and undeveloped parts of the project or referencing articles more seriously. Hey have a look at

Thanks yes they have a sort of "ocean" shade to them don't they. Cool. Aqua blue and green are my favourite colours

Wanna help translate

Yeah the HIstory, geography and economy is GA quality which I wrote. The problem is the lack of reliable in depth web info on some of the others and difference sources available. I'd love it if we were at that stage where everything had been started and I could completely concentrate on increasing GAs. The problem is the next article you click in that category is likely to be a one liner, thats why I can't stay on one article too long when half of the country is still missing one here.

For Spanish articles I am! See

Aw come on 1/10th? Thats not even 1/500th!. I tried checking to see how many articles I created using the tools but anybody with over 100,000 edits it doesn't work. I;ve created far too many articles to keep track of from just about every country or topic going. I would hazard a guess its surpassed 30,000 by now. maybe around 35,000. That list will grow, and if I primarily focus on writing articles from the spanish speaking world, it soon become a large proportion of the decent articles I create. I still create tons of stubs because of what is missing, but I generally only create content these days that can be expanded by anybody else within minutes. The other day I stubbed

OK Xalapa's just about GA standard I think. Could do with some more filling out of sections but it will get there

Shahid I;ve begun a hugely ambitious task of translating

Have you seen the Tenerife article or not?? Oh and notice the resemblance of

I'm on a wiki break today, I was bored so logged in for a mo. Once it is translated all of the references will be filled out and if possible I'll add other sources from english sites on the web so eventually it should be up to featured standard with a bit of work.

Hi Shshshsh.

Thats 3 times you haven't responded in 3 days.

Very true.