User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

New Message

I've done some organization at

"Talk"? 16:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


I have discussed with Giro who does a lot of organizational work for WP Films and he like me thinks its time we standardized the cinema groups and took the Indian cinema group as part under our wing and part WP:India. At present it seems like many of the participants are inactive and unfortunately general Indian cinema project organization is suffering as a result despite the great work of its active members on certain articles. Now a move to

"Talk"? 17:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Tu español es excellente amigo. Y gracias . Quiero aprender hablar y escribir español con fluidez en el futuro. You support the restructuring then? It can only bring solidarity to film and bio articles related to Indian cinema and it will create more interest in the project and encourage active members of films to check it out and try to contribute . There would soon enough be a drive to assess all articles and work at developing everything in coordination with our goals .

"Talk"? 17:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

It wouldn't affect the projects uniqueness. As it is the project is alienated and the 400 or so editors at WP Films can't really get in to attempt to assess them. It is still exactly the same. I appreciate your love of Indian cinema as the best but do you want better organization or not? The seperate group hasn't really got any form of article assessment it didn't even have any mention of the top articles until a minute ago

"Talk"? 18:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Of course it would copy the same version -it would be exactly the same!! . It would be exactly the same pages just under WP:Films assessment to coordinate it better

"Talk"? 18:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I've stated what I think on the talk page as you asked me what I thought . Yow!! Boohooo.Sob sob.

"Talk"? 21:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hey I found an image for

"Talk"? 11:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm uploading another she is such a beauty as Stven Irwin would have siad . This Bollywood blog thing is treasure trove - I managed to negotiate again with the site to remove some of the watermarks on many of their images -this is why there now are some more clear available although many still have it on

"Talk"? 11:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

See

"Talk"? 15:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

You know with some references and expansion perhaps on production we could get

"Talk"? 16:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I have an older film request. For some reason

"Talk"? 17:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry mate but it isn't at all. The lists are supposed to mention the main characters or most prominent in the film. Any mention of the key cast members is useful and Pa is doing a great job. Please don't

"Talk"? 18:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The most important thing is that even the titles are put into the lists but if it has info this is evne better to start with. At a later date more actors can be added if relevant but it is off to a good start. Don't worry if the details on actors are not fully complete yet - it is far more important the films are added to the lists . Regards

"Talk"? 18:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Well for instance Die Hard 3. Now who are the main characters - Would you say it is POV for Bruce Willis to be mentioned as a main character? From the many clips of Bollywood films from the 1970s particular the Romance films often there were two or three main characters -often these people were featured on the poster of film as they were central to the story. If for some reason soembody vandalised it because it was missing two or three actors then I'm sure it would be reverted soon enough. Ideally the lists should mention four to five actors but different films often have a differing number of central characters.

"Talk"? 18:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Now hang on. Are you talking about the introduction or the actors of each film in the tables. I thought you were talking about the number of actors mentioned in the tables for each films

"Talk"? 18:42, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I thought you were talking about the number of cast mentioned for each film . DId you mean about mentioning actors in the introduction ?

"Talk"? 18:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Well? If you are talking about mentioning a few actors in intro for the whole decade then it can appear as POV and should perhaps not be in there - as of course there were many prominent actors . Are you talking about this? I thought you were on about the content in tables - please respond thanks

"Talk"? 18:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Ah amigo. Ah well thats clears a lot of things up!!!! LOL!! To be honest I was a little confused - I was sure you were talking about how many actors should be mentioned in tables for each film!!! Pa did mention about writing a good intro - but its probably best not to mention the actors in thinking about it - POV at first didn't occur to me. As it is now its fine I think and is referenced. If you can think of anyhting else important than please add it. Hey did you really like Zora? I know he/she founded the Indian cinema group and proabably has done the greatest work in the past for the group - but from what I remember she was quite rude to many people. I know when I told her I was creating a list of missing films to help the project she snapped at me big time

"Talk"? 19:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

LOL!!! Not offended but was confused what you were talking about!! Good going on the 80s!! Saludos!

"Talk"? 19:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Pretty rude from what I remember - disagreeable with many people. I'm sure User:Etlantik and a few others thought she was rude. In fact I remember feeling quite shocked at the response I and others got from her -quite nasty in fact -it seemed well out of order. A great wikipedian would be able to put aside disagreements and move on with helping the project not give up. She did a great deal of good for Indian cineam on wiki I'll give her that. All the best

"Talk"? 19:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

For films by year see

Select a year you want a list from e.g 1980. ON the left select by language and click hindi -and there you go. Goood luck! Heads up (meaning good start) on Zintas Canadian film

"Talk"? 19:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Not that I know of -there probably is somewhere on one of the Bollywood sites. It works for me - I've just added 1960 and there so much missing!!

"Talk"? 19:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

You probably looked for India not Hindi. See [Please press my button Shahid. Pretty please with sugar on top]

"Talk"? 20:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Great news. I've learned how to digitally enhance or crop images. That site has the very latest images which can be cropped easily and modified. It also has a great number of other people other than actors. See

"Talk"? 14:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Yep Two new images for

"Talk"? 16:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

No I don't bother watching pages at all. I am only editing a lot on Bollywood pages to get the images sorted out particularly today. Then I can move on.

"Talk"? 16:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I managed to crop an image of my bald head also

"Talk"? 16:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanks for your kind words. Yes I am cropping them and altering the colour and contrast to make them look more attractive. The site even has images of more obscure actors, models and people. If they are with somebody or have a watermark bring the image to me and I'll crop them out of it and digitally alter it so we have the desired image -we should have images of most of Bollywood soon enough

"Talk"? 20:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

One thing I love about Bollywood actors and actresses is their clothes. The jeans and shirts and leather jackets and shoes they wear are super -always looking mint- I've always tried to copy that designer style with my own dress code.

"Talk"? 20:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I've just found two free images of Brad Pitt and Angelina jolie taken in Pune from that site -I'll upload and see what I can do

"Talk"? 21:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Sari's look great. I also like

"Talk"?
21:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC) I had a go at altering
"Talk"? 21:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

There we go. What Angelina would look like postage stamp style

"Talk"? 18:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

Well tough luck

"Talk"? 18:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

LOL! He kind of looks a bit like

"Talk"? 19:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Can I kindly ask you though to stop removing so many red links though. I know you are trying to tidy but you are shutting off potential new articles. In my experience several red links of missing articles encourages editors to create them and expand the encyclopedia further. Thanks

"Talk"? 21:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Well I disagree. Deactivating links in infoboxes is fine but there is no harm in a few red links in the article at all particularly if they are important articles that are missing - although if you are about to propose for a FA then this is approproate . I also consider it rude to speak in capital letters as if you are shouting, which I have noticed you do to several people. PLease do not speak to me in capital letters again. Thankyou

"Talk"? 06:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I've started about 15 new articles and counting from the Govinda article or related links. Filling in gaps can be done in a small amount of time and it is much more beneficial for the encyclopedia. Ridding of two red links in Govindas article for instance rids of two red links in Preeti Jhangiani etc etc -it has a chain effect and each article in turn then connects to at least another 10 etc. The articles are connected in many different articles this is why it is important not to shut them all off purely for aesthetic purposes. The best thing to do is the either leave a specific request on the Indian cinema notebook page for red links which need articles immediately or stub them yourself or give me a list of red links you have found in top Indian cinema bio articles that require filling. A stub is better than nothing and sets a good basis to expand and build the encyclopedia further on. This way we no longer have the ugly red links, the encyclopedia is increasingly connected to the max and there is no hiding what it doesn't have which is the easy way out.

Warmest Regards

"Talk"? 10:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

In those fifteen or so articles I have now rid of some 100 red links in total in many of the actor filmographies. All the best

"Talk"? 10:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Now if you could fix Govindas filmography giving it the good ole silver treatment and ordering I'll aim to start every film he's ever starred in on wikipedia in an hour or two!!!

"Talk"? 10:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

"THANKS"!! (LOL). If you look there is no text directly copywrighted for these articles . However as I was using the imdb plot as a source and tried to rewrite it in my own words it may appear similar. If there were several sites with the plot I could get a better persepctive a write a completely individual plot which would not resemble imdb in the slightest. The best thing is to set these articles up (a try to avoid familiar text)!! Adios

"Talk"? 11:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Feel free to add plots to

"Talk"? 11:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I also found an image for

"Talk"? 11:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Devipuram article

Thanks for your kind words. I'm surprised you happened upon it, but gratified that you liked it. (Devi bhakta 03:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Rahul's message

No Problem Shahid!! Thanks for creating a separate page for the Female winners. --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 17:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shahid I wanted to ask you something. I was editing Tabu's page and it said that she won a Best Debut Award in 1994 but when I clicked on the link it says that Sonali Bendre won it. Do you know who won the "Female Debut" award in 1994? Before you took out the female winners from the original
Filmfare Best Debut Award page, it said that Tabu had won it[1] but the new page for the female winners indicated that Sonali Bendre won it.[2] I'm confused.. Could you help?? Thanks --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 17:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Okay! Thanks --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 18:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on making Zinta a GA. You're hard work has finally paid off!! All the best in making it a FA. Best Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 19:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Manisha

Hi. I actually meant to reply earlier about this many weeks back but forgot. Anyway I had watched the film Saudagar a few months back and it said "Introducing Manisha Koirala" in the starting credits of the film so I am very much certain it was her first film. And if you google Manisha koirala then the links say that her bollywood debut was Saudagar. Shakirfan 18:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neetu Chakra

Have you heard of

"Talk"? 14:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi I'm back. Whats up ? I don't know what it is today I feel really drowsy and my concentration levels are low so I can't be editing much. I managed to find us some images of Asha Bhosle and her sister Lata. Its a shame we can't get some images of when they were young.

"Talk"? 16:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

All I can suggest is that you upload an image of either of them when they were young and add a full rationale to explain why an image is needed to identify them in their youth and prime and how encyclopedic this is. Then state a replaceable free image is impossible as it was over 40 years ago. I've seen this approved in places where is it not feasible to find an image of them when they are retired or something.

"Talk"? 16:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm feeling pretty ill today so I'll cut it short. I've added some images to the Bollywood page to what I believe are some of the highest earners and critically acclaimed in the industry today. I am however keen to avoid any issues of POV which you might be concerned about and reverting it. Is there some source that states the highest earners in the Bollywood film industry today? If so it could become: The Top Ten highest earning actors in Bollywood today and be referenced to avoid any selective POV issues. Now I may have missed out some actors or actresses which you consider more prominent than these but I'm pretty sure these are amongst the most popular. Could you find some source which indicates most acclimaed or highest earnign to make this valid. I'd hate for it to be rmeoved from the article. Thanks

"Talk"? 20:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

You reverted it already without any discussion

"Talk"? 20:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Well it does seem a shame to have all the images of Bollywood people and not include any at all in the article. I agree with you about POV (I was just amazed you were so quick to react and revert) this is why I believe it would be right to find a list of the highest earners to make it valid. It seems a shame to remove any indication of some of the most prominent actors in the industry just for the sake of POV. From a different perspective if I was reading an encyclopedia article on Bollywood I would want to know who some of the most famous actors and actresses are but it fails to do this

"Talk"? 20:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

If you disagree with that- I really think the page needs a table or something of the actors who have won the most awards or something in contemporary Indian cinema. Could you create a table of the Top 10 actors who have received the most awards and nominations or something? This way POV selection can't be disputed and it gives some information which is pretty important that is at present missing

"Talk"? 20:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I agree its difficult to write an article about a whole industry and to mention some people at the expense of others. However I do believe there needs to be some information on the highest awarded (most Filmfare Awards won for example) to give the reader an indication of who the officially most acclaimed people are in the industry without POV but based on fact. Just a suggestion -it was something important I believed that was missing .

"Talk"? 20:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes its a difficult one as often most awards won don't correlate to gross earnings. Martin Scorses is perhaps the biggest example of this. It is difficult to mention anybody at all without a POV issue as you say but this means knowledge of the most prominent in the industry is missing. Have a think- I am impressed by your keeness to keep the encyclopedia completely neutral. Regards

"Talk"? 20:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Muuch better amigo!. If possible some of highest grossing films could also be mentioned but it is an improvement. Are you familiar with

"Talk"? 21:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I can tell she looks classy and is very pleasant looking -she looks a lovely person. I've just started an article on

"Talk"? 21:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I haven't could you suggest any? I bet she was a stunner. I really have to get some Bollywood films -youtube only shows the songs. I want to see all of the films not just clips of them -I;d get a much better impression of hindi films this way.

"Talk"? 21:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Shes the same age as my dad!!! Lol! I think I'll try to buy the dvd of

"Talk"? 22:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Esplendido!!! Is there no end to beautiful Bollywood actresses!! I don't think many people outside Indian actually realize how many beautiful women there actually are. I love

"Talk"? 22:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

They are starting to looking good aren't they with every new image uploaded!!. This is only just the beginning of course!! Its time the world realised how many beautiful people there are in the industry. I always knew there were some stunners like Aishwarya Rai and Shilpa Shetty but I never realised how many!! I enjoy uploading their images they really are stunning to look at. Thanks for your adjustments to Dabas -I;m sure there are many missing articles on lesser known actors which have images. Hey I'm feeling really sick tonight -I had a chicken curry last night and there was something wrong with it -I hope I haven't got a stomach bug from it or something. Anyway great talking to you I'm off to bed to try and sleep it off!! All the best amigo

"Talk"? 22:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Wow check out the image crop

"Talk"? 08:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Lol!! Now heres one I thought I'd never create.

"Talk"? 10:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

"Talk"?
14:02, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Heres another good one.
"Talk"? 15:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Muy bueno! Gracias. Yes I've found I can crop almost any image on there which is a huge bonus -Shilpa Shetty once did not have any images!!!. I got us a decent image of SRK but his page keeps getting vandalised by anonymous. It gets very annoying those niggly little disruptions. Koena and Neha are gorgeous!!!! I've put Neha on my user page

"Talk"? 16:16, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Can you check this image and let me know if this is Mithun Chandrakorty or whatever his name is I'm not sure. If so I'll upload it is immediately thanks

"Talk"? 16:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

No I am surprised he doesn't even have a page

"Talk"? 18:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes I happened to notice your new article when I checked the new pages nice going -I used my new rationale template to silence the image taggers. Yes this Hindu Boar is a bit of a "bore". I have even been speaking with the director of Caledonian Publishing agian today and despite all hes done he is willing to set the record straight again. I wish people would stop fussing about images which already have officially recognized ticketing and stop trying to ruin everything and contribute to the content of the encyclopedia instead. No need to worry - an admin has assured me he will be blocked if he persists on disrupting. I aim to get American films of 1946 and 1948 done tonight its going well I have done much of 1942 and 1944 over the last day or two. I printed one year off earlier and it looks great printed out -really encyclopedic and helpful -it also gives me a chance to check out some of these classic films (but most are bad stubs). Best regards

"Talk"? 19:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Here [3] but all you do is click recent changes and then select new. I view it pretty often to see how it is growing and wikify new articles.

"Talk"? 20:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Great new article - I've already nominated it for a DYK for you before seeing your message. You may want to reference it a bit more and perhaps stub that German festival or something

"Talk"? 20:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I tell you who I think its the world's most beautiful woman. See Shania Twain . I love her so much!!! Everything about

"Talk"? 11:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I know. Some people don't like her but I can say that for me she is exactly the type of woman to fall in love with!!! Many agree she is most often cited in the TOP 100 worlds most beautiful women but I think she is above people like J lo and all that. I think she is perfect.

"Talk"? 11:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

E.g see this image. Hey whats up with the toolbar?

"Talk"? 11:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Dunno. I had a problem with my user last week I couldn;t change my skin. I had to press enter instead. Try changing your skin temporarily or seomthing and see if it makes a difference

"Talk"? 18:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

It might have something to do with

"Talk"? 18:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes constantly but remember my setting is probably about as different from yours as it can get. I have a waifer thin screen, use cologne blue, have the screen settings to a blue tone, have my toolbar on the left in a column, and use the font Callisto and have my main page set at

"Talk"? 18:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I use Firefox I think. You can create your own main page with Preity Zinta on or something!! It took me ages to learn how to alter the settings and fonts

"Talk"? 19:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I've noticed this article several times partly because i added an image and partly because she is Nepalese born, a country I am highly interested in and have done much wiki work on. Its taking shape nicely at present just needs a reference or two in the intro. The Zinta article makes an excellent role model for the other Indian cinema articles such as this to aspire to, I don;t know why it is taking so damn long to be reviewed - lazy tossers!!! The best thing to be done at present is to add some of the missing articles in the filmography first and then develop this further. Regards

"Talk"? 21:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

It's comin on good boyo. KUTGW. As

"Talk"? 21:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Just to let you know - every time you see a LOL from me this is what is being emitted!!! [4]!!

"Talk"? 21:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Quite ingenius. My evil intellect must be rubbing off on you!! Your message was great timing I've not been on here much all day and have just sitting down to eat!!

"Talk"?
17:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Ohhhh . Check out how gorgeous she looks here, shes such a doll:
[5] —Preceding
talk • contribs) 17:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Sorry I can't help it I'm crazy about her!! LOL!

"Talk"? 17:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Yeh I know! I swear Shania's husband

"Talk"? 18:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Have you heard of Def leppard? Its quite unique in that they are huge in America since the early 1980s - they are English but are actually more popular in the UNited States which is rare as it is a very difficult market to break into. At some of the concerts in England there were hundreds of die hard American rock fans in the audience! The band

"Talk"? 18:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Leppard are very similar to Bon Jovi, Aeromsith, Whitesnake and Guns n Roses - hard rock but with soul and feeling -those classic rock ballads. These are amongst my favourite bands. Joe Satriani is a world master guitarist, his compositions speak words and meaning wihtout lyrics. Its beautiful. Have a look at Rubina

"Talk"? 19:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Oh i forgot! Yes I have heard of

"Talk"? 19:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The writing in the Abbas article is about 98% mine although Sangak is responsible for referencing and upkeep. Its very poetic isn't it. It has been cut a bit and minor edited by a few - I think it was better at a fuller length. I was asked by Sangak back in about February to help him and I decided to spend a week or two concentrating on a FA. It went from start class to FA in about two weeks. It was one of the rare occasions i have decided to develop articles all the way as so much needs doing with start and stub class articles which dominate most of my editing time. I did get some time to write

"Talk"? 19:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I am quite surprised we are allowed to keep

"Talk"? 19:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I know I should concentrate more on writing but don't think that minor edits on stub/start class articles aren't important also. For me it is of chief importance to try to set out the foundations of the project first and create a more even start to avoid systematic bias and then to begin to develop articles fully afterwards. So much needs doing in turning stubs into start class articles that it tends to take over most of my edits at present. Writing full length quality articles takes a lot of effort and work and time also. That Zinta article is taking ridiculously long to review. Auf Wiedersehn.

"Talk"? 20:13, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

44,50,00,000 looks like 44,500,000 -44 million 500 thousand but it is more likely to be 445,000,000 as in 445 million. Its written strangely isn;t it -two digits is a wrong way of applying it. I have no idea what the going currency rates are or how much this is is dollars or pound sterling. It might be a good idea to list the top highest grossing films in a table on the Bollywood page though

"Talk"? 21:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

According to the on line currency converter the figure is equivalent to £55,521,31.04 -about 55 million pounds. Judging by how huge the Indian is and the number of people who see these films I would have thought it would be higher. I've heard that Preity Zinta and Bacchan, Salman Khan and Shadrukh Khan are actually watched by more people than even Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt because of Indias 1 billion population

"Talk"? 21:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Looks like 445 million then. That would be about right

"Talk"?
22:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Mmm. I'd stick to millions. Although the crore article explains what it is its less confusing as millions. ALl the gross references on other world films are in milions whatever the currency
"Talk"?
23:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC) That sounds great gross would be one of the first columns I'd imagine and reviews etc at the end. Sorry I am in the middle of getting extremely peed off with this Beta bot which keeps giving me 50 kb images of ones I have already tagged for deletion . Its a flamin nightmare!!
"Talk"?
23:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC) It keeps giving me repeat messages of images I have already corrected or put up for deletion. Once is enough but twice and three times is taking the
"Talk"?
23:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC) I don't mind so much 10 different images for tagging. What is annoying me is that it is giving me two or three repeat messages for each of the 10 images!!.
"Talk"?
23:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC) "Hurrah for Dixie"!!! (As was said in the Good the Bad and the Ugly) . Its been a long time coming and I told you it was easily a GA before. It looks like an A class to me which with some work has FA potential. Congrats
"Talk"? 10:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Crikey when do you sleep??? !!

"Talk"?
10:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Yes you need to address the points on the talk page which are minor. Personal life needs to be moved up to the top -see the Abbas Kiarostami article
"Talk"? 10:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Much of that section is background and puts it in its context. On the Angelina article family and early life also goes first. Now if you could expand that relationships section or something we could move it down into a seperate paragraph

"Talk"? 10:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

I am about to upload a few more images which I have cropped and enhanced. I think you also need to be more specific with her modelling. You often say in various commericla or whatever. This will need to be more precise and actually cite some of the things she has modelled for

"Talk"?
11:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC) There is no way to get rid of the watermark unfortunately without seriously damging the image unfortunately
"Talk"? 11:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC).[reply
]

No I've tried it looks awful see

"Talk"?
11:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC) It looks awful. It doesn't have a clear image of her face anyway
"Talk"?
11:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Yeah I tried to overwrite it but it just went blaahhh. LOL! I've ulpoaded the sunglasses one but I wish they didn't have to ruin the images with that watermark. Nevermind the few we have is way better than none as before
"Talk"?
11:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC) I wish there was some way to keep her fit body in the picture but the best I could do with that is her face again
"Talk"? 11:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Kareena Kapoor was only possible because the watermark only covered part of her neck

"Talk"? 12:12, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Trust me it can't be done without seriously damaging it. I think thats enough now anyway it looks fine -I would have liked that red dress image though I agree

"Talk"?
12:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC) OK I'm done with it for today. Its better than it was - you should propose it for a A tomorrow. See if you can add anything else about those commercials she was in etc
"Talk"? 12:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Theres nothing much in those sources I don't think . We can't really say "she was a naughty girl" LOL!!

"Talk"? 12:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Perhaps you could mention that she is a keen athlete since her childhood and is into fitness or mention her height or something.

"Talk"? 12:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Back

Hello, Shahid,

I guess I'm back, yes. However, you guys are much faster than me. Whenever I go to a page to change something, you have already done it. Lots of people seem to be working on the Indian Cinema Project and Rani Mukherjee's article seems to be a quite place these times. Good work! Best regards, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 18:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Jaanam Samjha Karo.jpg

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jaanam Samjha Karo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 20:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Preity Zinta

I don't think I'll be able to help with that particular photo of Preity Zinta. The position of the watermark, running across her throat and curled hair makes it problematic. Sorry. Feel free to ask if you come across another image you'd like to use. — WiseKwai 15:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That photo can be cropped easily at chest level, however it is pretty small - even at its maximum width of around 155 pixels, the quality isn't that great. Not to be argumentative, but I notice there are several nice photos already on the article. How will yet another image contribute to the article? — WiseKwai 16:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation. It makes sense to me. So cropping that second image wouldn't served to illustrate her fitness. If you do come across another image that you think is workable, let me know. — WiseKwai 16:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Groan groan. Shahid why did you ask WiseKwai to alter the image when I told you the position of it was awkward and couldn't be altered? Didn't I say he wouldn't be able to do it?

"Talk"? 17:37, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

In fact I told you twice!!

"Talk"? 17:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

No worries just thought I made it clear that it couldn't be done by anybody - I agree it was a hot image of her though. The info about her father and athletics is good but you'll need to cut out the gossip-esque words. Tally ho chaps!

"Talk"? 18:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Its fine. Its sad that both Preity and Shania lost their parents in an accident.

"Talk"? 21:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi. I don't know what it is I've felt drowsy all week, its like all my energy has gone and I find it difficult to concentrate on stuff.

"Talk"? 18:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Its not the curry. I don't know I've had it a while I think I am going to have an allergy test or something. It kind of makes me feel really tired and unable to concentrate on something. Its like my head is spinning - I've tried getting some fresh air or whatever but it isn't that. Hey are you gonna propose Zinta for an A yet?

"Talk"? 19:05, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Yep give it a go. You've worked alot on it the last two days and it has new pictures. Just make sure you reference those new parts you added and send. Knowing the process it'll probably be Christmas before it is looked at anyway (chuckle chuckle).

"Talk"? 19:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Ah but you've readded some of the stuff I removed yesterday about her buddies and that which isn't appropriate

"Talk"? 19:59, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

The buddy and female counterpart thing wasn't a good idea but the rest is OK. I still think you should move the part about her fathers death in with the car accident part so it flows.

"Talk"?
20:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Looks pretty good now I think. It is an excellent source of encyclopedic information which is what its about. Good luck!
comment was added at 20:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Hopefully we can find another image to go in the early career section as it is a bit bare. Hey I was quite chuffed to see my name in
"Talk"? 20:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]


Please don't what?? I said hopefully we can find a new image to fill the gap. Did I say something about restoring the blurry dark image?

"Talk"?
21:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC) I think the article is looking very good amigo. I should propose it for an A asap . The we can focus on that much deserved FA. Regards
"Talk"?
23:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC) It would be good if you could find out how or why she entered into modelling. There is a little gap there from the time she finished college to modelling. Did somebody suggest it to her? , how did she land a modlelling contract? and with whom? etc
"Talk"?
23:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC) It seems like she gained a criminal psychology degree and then suddenly she was a model and actress where there is no indication of this change in path
"Talk"?
23:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC). Exactly what I was looking for! Good. This should be added as it does fill in the only gap I could see.
"Talk"? 23:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

We need some time indication of when Preity met Kapur . The references to date and context in this period is pretty vague

"Talk"? 00:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

OK I agree but the GA reviewer was keen to define her film career

"Talk"? 00:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

As Aretha Franklin and my main man

"Talk"?
01:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Yes sorry I was a little late in replying I've been busy with some Filipino stuff. Yes we need to be careful with sources. Just because it is an Intenret source indeed doesn't ensure its validity. If you have any doubt then leave it out. See if you can find another source to support it
"Talk"? 13:21, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

CNN is a reliable source so use it. Add all that you can then. We might be able to get a seperate modelling section after all

"Talk"? 14:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Have u been watched movie !

Both two actors are not in film ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aung Phyoe (talkcontribs) 15:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am not shouting sorry. I just inform u Ok ! Enjoy ur movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aung Phyoe (talkcontribs) 15:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well Done

I knew this meant a LOT to you! Fantastic and it was long in the waiting. What's your next project? Universal Hero 19:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kareena Kapoor

Thanks Shahid, Thank you very much for giving me pointers with

Kareena Kapoor's article. So you're saying to keep formality I should change wherever it says Kareena to either "Kapoor" or "She". Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 22:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Shahid do you think the breakthrough section needs to be expanded in Kapoor's page. I mean after 2001, talking about 2002 and 2003. She had six releases from 2002-2003 and they all flopped. Do you think it's okay how it is or should I expand it? Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 23:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! Thanks! I really appreciate your advice as you've become one of those editors whose opinion is really important to me! Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 23:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm waiting! --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 23:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wow Shahid!!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH!! I can't believe that you consider me worthy of this branstar!! LOL!! Once again thank you very much for the barnstar and all the best! P.S. Can't wait to watch
Shahrukh Khan, Kajol, Preity Zinta, Karisma Kapoor, Rani Mukerji, Salman Khan, Vidya Balan and Saif Ali Khan. BTW, Preity looks DAMN HOT in the OSO promo on indiafm. =) Best Regards --Bollywood Dreamz Talk 00:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Hey Shahid!! Thanks for your inputs and desire to help make ]

Hema Sardesai

Updated DYK query On
14 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hema Sardesai, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page
.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 16:50, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats. I told you it was a DYK !! Good work. Did you think anything more about that Zinta modelling info?

"Talk"? 19:09, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello

Hello friend. I came to your user page from today's DYK

Featured status. So far, the only two Indian cinema related featured articles are Satyajit Ray and Lage Raho Munna Bhai. There are several articles that are in really good shape, including Preity Zinta, and probably Shilpa Shetty. Some more works should get those featured status. What do you think? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi. Yes Blofeld is an excellent contributor. I checked the source of the photos. Those are in CCbySA 2.0, so there should not be any problem, provided the photos actually belong to the website. It is a blog, so there is chance that they themselves are using photos from elsewhere. Preity Zinta seems to be in great shape. I will try to go through it, You can also start a
peer review now.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:ANI

If you want, you can say something here. Gnanapiti 18:38, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review/Asha Bhosle

Wikipedia:Peer review/Asha Bhosle/archive1 is on my watchlist. I've already started working on the suggestions; will keep updating the article. utcursch | talk 11:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to make any changes you deem necessary. utcursch | talk 12:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding Sources of Yolandita Monge's article

Sorry but that's really bothering, I had sent you this message,

"...Hey I noticed your last addition on the Yolandita Monge article. It's fine be. It is very well written yet it's unsourced. Can you tell me please where does this stuff come from? Waiting for your reply, thanks...."

And you removed it from your talk page. Please reply to this message, or provide reliable sources on the page of this singer. If you don't do that within 24 hours, I'll remove/revert your additions from the page. ShahidTalk2me 18:01, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I apologize for having removed your message and the delay in answering you, I'm a very busy man. Although there are no specific sources for the additions, they are part of a well known story, that has been extensively documented in entertainment magazines in Puerto Rico for many, many years. Furthermore, I don't see any reference to sources for the contents of the article prior to my additions, but if you feel the need to remove my additions, go ahead, feel free to do it. However, it would deny a lot of people not familiar with the real story the chance to know the truth at a time when she has become the most talked about entertainer in Puerto Rico. Best regards: --Entre-Nos 03:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"...OK, we'll leave it. Perhaps needs some rewriting, but OK. Thanks, Shahid..." • Talk2me 11:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
You're welcome, Shahid. Best regards: --Entre-Nos 15:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]