User talk:Signedzzz

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why you deleted the fact that the judge who sentenced Paul's attacker to 30 days in prison, rather than the prosecutors' requested 21 month prison sentence, is a Bill Clinton appointee? Don't tell me it's irrelevant because that is nonsense. Quis separabit? 04:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not mentioned in the ref, so it's

zzz (talk) 04:42, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

2018 North Korea–United States summit

Hello, I recovered the contents regarding the actual international reaction, and I also updated reference of example to international reaction. Please don't remove the facts along with

WP:NPOV

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article
  article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

zzz (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello @Zzz:

. Before getting advice from ]

Hello, I see that you have been warned about making

.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article
  article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. Suite1408 (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

@

zzz (talk) 06:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Signedzzz: It is not my intention to falsify sources, it is my intention to make sure there is balance and compromise. Sorry if you don't care for my edits but don't try to start an edit war and please... try to find some common ground with other fellow Wikipedians and resolve conflicts civilly or you will no doubt end up getting blocked. Suite1408 (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Incompetence is not a valid defence in Wikipedia. See

zzz (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Possible renaming of "Sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic dioceses of Pennsylvania"

Signedzzz, I reverted your edits to the lede of

, because your revised lede would indicate that this page focuses entirely on the six-diocese grand jury investigation. The title of the page is more general than that; it covers all of Pennsylvania. So -- as it now stands -- the lede needs to be more general.

However, after thinking about your edits, I'm wondering if the page should focus solely on the six-diocese investigation. I've started a section about this on the article's

]

Effort for Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Your efforts show enough to get a Barnstar. ✉ 03:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Stop using the sources on

]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, thanks for your recent updates at

]

zzz (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RFC Request

Dear Fellow Wikipedian

I would like to invite you to my RFC request on  the page One America News Networks. I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.

Kind Regards

Saad Ahmed2983 (talk) 11:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC) –[reply]

Now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Signedzzz reported by User:Sanglahi86 (Result: ). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]