User talk:SillyRyno

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Image Tagging Image:Moody.gif

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Moody.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Hetar 05:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Moody.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Moody.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:38, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Lifeboat6.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Lifeboat6.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:59, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lowelifeboat.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hunter 10:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Lowe1.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lowe1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hunter 10:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Lifeboat6.JPG

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Lifeboat6.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hunter 11:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Titaniclowe.jpg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Titaniclowe.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hunter 11:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:IraHayes.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:IraHayes.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:ReneGagnon.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ReneGagnon.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:48, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:Johnbradleynavy.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnbradleynavy.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:Strank.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Strank.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:HarlonBlock.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HarlonBlock.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Unspecified source for Image:21sousley.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:21sousley.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TyrusRaymondCobb.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eubulides (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC) The basic idea is that the image is being moved to Wikipedia Commons and was retouched slightly. Eubulides (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of
Reginald Lee
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Reginald Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reginald Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 18:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Feistdog.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Possible future article suggestions?

First off, massive thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. You sources on FBI records for D.B. Cooper are important, especially as I agree early accounts of the event are much more accurate than later articles. I am curious if you have read or could acquire the book “Prayer Man: The Exoneration of Lee Harvey Oswald” By Stan Dane (2015), which makes use of early accounts to suggest on LHO’s possible whereabouts at 12:30 pm on 11/22/63. I know the JFK conspiracies have been the topic of heated discussions on Wikipedia and tend to be regarded as fringe theories but I am wondering if you could be able to read the Stan Dane prayer man book and use it as a source for the Lee Harvey Oswald article. One way it can be used is Harry Holmes’ testimony in the police interrogation section on Oswald article: the current words, “went downstairs where he encountered Baker” give the impression Oswald said the encounter took place at the second floor lunchroom but Holmes clarifies that Oswald was talking about encountering the officer at the vestibule on the first floor by the front entrance. Holmes describes two set of doors which were in the building vestibule (which were a front lobby between two set of doors). The paragraph could be rewritten to reflect Holmes’ testimony something like: “Oswald said he was at the first floor vestibule by the front entrance and wanted to see what the “commotion” was when he encountered an officer.”

If you haven’t read the “Prayer Man” book, I highly recommend you do so or keep an open mind about it. There was a discussion/agreement a while back that Wikipedia really shouldn't be using the Warren Report so heavily; there are plenty of good secondary sources we could be using. The section is massively over-reliant on the Warren Report. Not just any one section, but all articles related to JFK's death. 60 years later it's largely a primary source. 213.107.1.222 (talk) 04:56, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I honestly don't have any interest in the JFK assassination. The scope is simply too broad for me. D.B. Cooper is very narrowly scoped and is something I consider myself to be an amateur expert on. I don't know anything about JFK's assassination, so I'm afraid that I'm of no help whatsoever in that regard. I appreciate your kind words though! SillyRyno (talk) 13:28, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your work on D B Cooper. Well done. John (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You! Glad to see that it is appreciated! SillyRyno (talk) 23:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, I just wanted to introduce myself. I've been editing and rewriting sections of the D.B. Cooper page off and on for a couple of months and I've enjoyed working with you. 2601:644:680:87C:84F4:EA83:640:D0CF (talk) 17:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're doing a great job. Doing a very valuable service. I'm an attorney, but I'm not so good with grammar and writing, so I appreciate what you've done with it. If you want to hear me rant about the Cooper wiki page, you can look up The Cooper Vortex podcast and you'll hear me ranting about it in an episode that was just released yesterday titled "DB Cooper is misunderstood". I've never been recorded a pod or anything, so I was nervous and just rambled for about 3 hours. At any rate, I appreciate your efforts! SillyRyno (talk) 20:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I reworked the new "Clip-on tie" section and I like where it landed. Thoughts, comments, changes? Let me know. Also, I listened to the podcast. Amazing stuff! 2601:644:680:87C:7C2E:BD14:FD29:5C6D (talk) 18:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for listening! I appreciate your continued efforts on the wiki. It is critical to get correct information out there. Regarding “subsequent FBI disclosures” I’m not even sure if they have disclosed enough stuff for a stand alone section! SillyRyno (talk) 20:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

saw this and thought of you!
https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/nov/11/week-ahead-of-vancouvers-coopercon-new-d-b-cooper-suspect-emerges/ 2601:644:680:87C:9F5:9806:6FD5:C7DB (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Ted Braden photo

In this edit you removed the date of the image claiming it is undated. Really? You uploaded it yourself with that date claiming it is "own work". If it is own work then you should know the date. If it is not own work then you must declare where you got it from and demonstrate it has a valid license for use here. SpinningSpark 13:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
D.B. Cooper copycat hijackings
has been accepted

D.B. Cooper copycat hijackings
, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme
to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation
if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation
.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]