User talk:Silverdashmax

Hello, Silverdashmax, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Niko Omilana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 1AmNobody24 (talk) 19:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the links and advice. This will be useful in the future, but it seems Whpq has solved the issue at hand. Silverdashmax (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 19:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page has not been deleted, but please see the note below about attribution. -- Whpq (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

]

Thank you for the advice I'll keep it in mind for future. Silverdashmax (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability isn't established by saying that he did stuff, it's established by showing that he passes

coverage and analysis about the stuff he did in media independent of himself. That is, you don't make a person notable as a YouTuber by sourcing his YouTube videos to themselves or their IMDb profiles as proof that they exist, you make a person notable as a YouTuber by sourcing his YouTube videos to media coverage about the videos as proof that they garnered media coverage. You don't make a person notable for being featured in other people's YouTube videos by sourcing those videos to themselves as verification that the videos exist, you make a person notable for being featured in other people's YouTube videos by sourcing those videos to evidence that media consider "Niko Omilana featured in Sidemen videos" to be important enough to write about and analyze as news.

What you haven't shown is any evidence of GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about Niko Omilana. Out of 35 footnotes, the overwhelming majority of them are primary sources (YouTube video sourced to itself or IMDB, "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of organizations he's directly affiliated with, etc.) or unreliable sources (CORQ, Social Blade) that don't contribute any GNG points at all, and what's left for proper GNG-worthy media coverage still isn't doing very much: there are media sources that don't mention Omilana at all and are there solely to verify a fact that's completely tangential to the question of whether Omilana is notable or not, there are sources that briefly mention Omilana's name without being about him in any meaningful sense, and there are sources that are "about" him in the context of his candidacy in an election he didn't win and thus doesn't pass

for. But what you haven't shown is any evidence of GNG-building media coverage in properly reliable sources about his YouTube work, which is what you would have to show to make him notable as a YouTuber. Again, the notability test is not "his YouTube work exists", it's "media have written independent third-party content about his YouTube work as independent third-party analysis of its significance", and you haven't shown any evidence of that.

Also, the draft has not been proposed for deletion at all, and certainly not by me — all I did was comment on the draft. So you respond to this not by arguing with me on my talk page, but by improving the draft with GNG-worthy sources. Bearcat (talk) 12:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not once have I tried to argue with you. In my message to you on your talk page, I simply said what has changed since February to make recreation of a new article warranted as asked for in your comment. Additionally in my message I elaborate by saying "Whilst the draft still needs expansion before being submitted, the draft shouldn't be deleted." Letting you know that I understand additional sources are still needed. In regards to the draft being proposed for deletion, it was proposed here, not by you, but the last line is still false. Silverdashmax (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That proposal was in March, and failed, meaning it isn't still on the table. Bearcat (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

Fram (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Concern regarding Draft:OFFBRAND

request

that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 03:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion of Draft:OFFBRAND

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

The page

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]