User talk:Skitzouk/Archives/2008/September
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Full names
Hi, I found O'Neill's full name using this website. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Project Updates
This Month in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
|
Member News
Recent News
Collaboration of the Week
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Deletion Debates
From the Editors
Contributors to this Issue:
|
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Recent Project News
This Fortnight in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
|
Member Updates
Recent Wrestling News
Collaboration
Cast your vote to select the next collaborations — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Recent Deletion Debates
Contributors to this Issue
|
Offstage trumpet
Why would you propose deletion within minutes of another editor creating the article. To my knowledge, there is no rule that says that you have to write a complete article "off line", and then post it to Wikipedia. An article can develop over a reasonable period. Could you give a person a fair period to get the article going...I dunno, perhaps 1 or 2 hours, before proposing an article for deletion? (except in the case of obvious vandalism, such as "Mary Bobosski is a ((#$)*", which is obviously not a real article). I think that you were too "quick on the trigger", fellow editorOnBeyondZebrax (talk) 20:04, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I just checked the History section. I started to have self-doubt, and think that maybe my mind was playing tricks...maybe the article had been there for a while??? The article was created and then four minutes later, up went the deletion tag. OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 20:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- What confused me about the policy was that I see "stub" articles with little more than a title and a single sentence. I suppose in some cases those are OK because a group have editors have decided, as part of a Wiki project, that an article is needed on that topic. Also, I have never had such a quick proposed deletion before, especially for such a low-profile article. But I went to that list of "started-and-never improved" articles, and I see your point. Most people just start badly, and walk away. My practice, though, is to develop the articles into respectable product...but I understand that you can't be scrolling through everyone's contrib's section...ThanksOnBeyondZebrax (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)