User talk:Smush123
Proposed deletion of The Crack Era
A
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
Welcome anyways
And now a much-owed... Welcome!
Hello, Smush123, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
And please see
Orphaned non-free image File:If It Ain't About Money.jpg
Will do. Thanks --Smush123 (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Ruff-Ryders-Past-Present-Future-Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
License tagging for File:Fat-Joe-Haha-Slow-Down.jpg
Thanks for uploading
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
More information needed about File:Fat-Joe-If-It-Aint-About-Money.jpg
Hello, Smush123!
It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Fat-Joe-If-It-Aint-About-Money.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.
If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.
Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:If It Ain't About Money.jpg
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a helpme}}
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Fat Joe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashanti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The article California Republic (mixtape) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Per WP:MUSIC, mixtapes are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
Possibly unfree File:The Darkside Vol. 3 cover.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Darkside Vol. 3 cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
February 2017
I provided a reference to the album credits. Why did you undo it?Smush123 (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Plata O Plomo (Fat Joe and Remy Ma album)
Regarding your recent edits to
"Since most recently-created works are copyrighted, almost any Wikipedia article which cites its sources will link to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain the permission of a copyright holder before linking to copyrighted material, just as an author of a book does not need permission to cite someone else's work in their bibliography. Likewise, Wikipedia is not restricted to linking only to CC BY-SA or open-source content." -
- Please take a moment to read the discussion at Plata O Plomo (Fat Joe and Remy Ma album) and tag it as unsourced until a more suitable source is found. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)]
February 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fat Joe. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
If you were to read the page it links to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Def_Jam:_Fight_for_NY the first paragraph states that Fat Joe is in the game. I can link to the IMDB if you wish? Smush123 (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- First, be polite. Second, please take a moment to read WP:CIRCULAR. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Pun. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikihounding
This edit appears vexatious and an attempt to
February 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Big Pun. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm asking you to self revert this edit. This is close to a
- @Lemongirl942: If you start a discussion I'd be happy to get involved. I do believe the original reversion was because I did not reference it. I have since done so. Smush123 (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- We follow WP:BRD here. So I am asking you to revert to the status quo ante. IMDb is not a reliable source. And FYI, sources need to be proved reliable - not the reverse. The onus lies on you to start a discussion and get consensus that IMDb is an RS. More importantly, you made the bold edit and then you continued to edit war against multiple editors without discussing. And then you decided to template me. Sorry but all of this disruptive. I am waiting for you to self revert. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)]
- We follow
- @Lemongirl942: I can reference MTV if you wish I just don't see how IMDB is less reliable. Also the fact that you have appeared out of nowhere to revert an edit on a page you have never edited leads me to believe you are attempting to troll me.
- For a start, one of our pillars is WP:USERGENERATEDsource which is unreliable. And since you were the one adding the information, the onus lies on you to start the discussion.
- You also do not seem to understand that you were edit warring. You made a change, and then you reverted 3 times to keep your version (despite multiple editors challenging your edits). And you never attempted to discuss even once. What's more, you put a warning template on my talk. At this moment, if I report you to WP:AN3, you will probably be blocked. If you self revert, at least it demonstrates good faith on your part and an understanding of where you went wrong. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)]
- For a start, one of our pillars is
- @Lemongirl942: I have now updated the reference after you have linked me to the Wikipedia page that says IMDb is not considered reliable. Thank you although I have noticed you have communication with Magnolia677 a user who is hounding me which I struggle to believe is coincidental. Please, cut it out both of you. Smush123 (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- Correcting mistakes of another user is not hounding. You are adding unreliable sources and you seem to have difficulty assuming good faith. More importantly, you seem to be deliberately ignoring my comment about edit warring. And I am not sure whether the source you added is reliable. Please come on the article talk page and discuss. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- And I just saw that the content you added at WP:BLP violation sourced to youtube videos. Please do not restore it unless you get consensus. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)]
- And I just saw that the content you added at
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fat Joe discography. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fat Joe discography. This edit did not support your previous edit. Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fat Joe discography. With this edit you added that the song "Represent"' was release on the following labels: Columbia Records, Loud Records, Relativity, Violator Records. You added this source, and told other editors in your edit summary "Clicking on each album the reference links to tells you their labels." Clicking on "Represent" takes you to this link. Columbia records is not listed.
For the song "Jealous One's Envy", you added that it was released by "Columbia Records, Relativity, Violator Records". Columbia is not listed at this source.
For the song "Don Cartagena", you added that it was released by "Atlantic, Big Beat, Mystic Entertainment Group Inc, and Rhino Entertainment Company". Rhino is not listed at this source. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Big Pun. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fat Joe Remy Ma Cookin Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Smush123. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Smush123. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mpire Music Group Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mpire Music Group Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Ruff Ryders: Past, Present, Future
The article
There is only one source and the album did not chart
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the
Orphaned non-free image File:Ruff-Ryders-Past-Present-Future-Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ruff-Ryders-Past-Present-Future-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)