User talk:SourceRight

Hello, SourceRight, and

Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SourceRight/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SourceRight/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SourceRight! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonita Doda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonita Doda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SourceRight! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sir im not connected to person in anyway ..my area of interest is actors and filmmaker's so I started with one (Jonita Doda) i have made all the changes and added every inline citation and made it totally neutral.kindly have a look and approve the page as it is of a highly notable actor.thanksSourceRight (talk) 12:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonita Doda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonita Doda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All wiki sources need to be replaced with reliable ones, also Amazon is not a suitable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonita Doda and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonita Doda, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonita Doda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonita Doda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Hatchens were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what does this mean how can i re edit and resubmit the article ? SourceRight (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't. In the AfC process, rejection is different from declining in that you aren't supposed to resubmit the article after a rejection. Please see

WP:OVERCOME. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 16:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ok thanks SourceRight (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

in that case sir u should go and remove every actor that you have on wikipedia.SourceRight (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how that's even close to accurate or reasonable. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 16:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that was in reference to a very rude remark by someone. SourceRight (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing has been removed from this talk page as far as I can see in the history, so I'm really not sure what rude remark you're referring to. Regardless, your suggestion is still not accurate or reasonable. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 17:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonita Doda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sir my bad I'm not able to see your reply...kindly help SourceRight (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "SourceRight", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sir as i explained it was my first article and i wasn't familiar with writing and editing formats. the choice of name was to represent my feeling of doing some right contribution.thats all ! SourceRight (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for the subject of your draft, or the agency that represents her/does her PR, you are a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit. 331dot (talk) 16:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no sir I'm a individual and in no way work for any company or represent the subject. As advised i have already requested for a change of user name. SourceRight (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your association with the subject? So you picked the name of a company as your username at random? I don't believe that. 331dot (talk) 16:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your user name is the same as a digital IT and technology consulting business, hence the confusion. Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sir its a sheer co incidence im not even aware if there is a company by that name.i have nothing to do with any it company.. you can see im not even a pro with my edits . im not a It guy. SourceRight (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

nothing sir im a film enthusiast and wanted to contribute to the same field but got stuck with the first article itself. im not even aware if sourceright is a company its a pure co- incidence SourceRight (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i request you to re consider the article so that i feel motivated to do more good contributions. SourceRight (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

nothing sir im a film enthusiast and wanted to contribute to the same field but got stuck with the first article itself. im not even aware if sourceright is a company its a pure co- incidence SourceRight SourceRight (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe for a second that you chose your username at random, please do not insult our intelligence. As a "film enthusasist" how did you decide on Ms. Doda to write about first if you have no association with her whatsoever? 331dot (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sir i had to start with somebody n it happened to be miss.doda as i saw there is not wikipedia in her name even after having a major contribution.and i can only tell you the truth i dont know how to make you believe wat im saying SourceRight (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And how did you obtain the image of her? 331dot (talk) 16:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

her image was on the wikipedia commons SourceRight (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I also see that you had attempted to upload several images of Ms. Doda on Commons that were deleted. How did you obtain those images? 331dot (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they were all available on google. SourceRight (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can't just use random images from the Internet; that's copyright infringement. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 16:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they were copyright free, i only used the eligible ones. SourceRight (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not, judging by your Commons talk page. Images are copyrighted by default unless they say otherwise, and usually very few do. — {{u|Bsoyka}} ^talk 17:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

im sure thats why they were deleted. as i mentioned earlier too it was my first contribution i wasnt aware about certain things. SourceRight (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.