User talk:Spaceflower
|
Unreferenced BLPs
- Mollie Hunter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
I've taken my facts from a Swedish book on children´s authors, related in Swedish wikipedia article about Mollie Hunter.--Spaceflower (talk) 03:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Given name template
I notice that you have been removing {{given name}} from articles about names, without giving a reason in the edit summary. If you have objections to the template, please discuss it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy before going further.
If you just want to remove articles from the head Category:Given names, this can be done with the parameter "nocat", e.g. {{given name|Anthony|nocat}}. - Fayenatic (talk) 07:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
- The reason is here: "This category is very large. Pages should be re-categorized into suitable subcategories where appropriate." [[1]]--Spaceflower (talk) 00:03, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- So just add the nocat parameter, instead of removing the template. Would you also please reinstate the template where you have removed it unnecessarily? - Fayenatic (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, but it would be easier if I knew why "given names" has to be used, since "Feminine given names" and "Polish given names" are undercategories of "Given names".--Spaceflower (talk) 13:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- So just add the nocat parameter, instead of removing the template. Would you also please reinstate the template where you have removed it unnecessarily? - Fayenatic (talk) 21:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Nikita
As an editor of dab Nikita, your input is invited at the merge discussion there. --Lexein (talk) 16:06, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/40px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of October 21 (Eastern Orthodox liturgics), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://days.pravoslavie.ru/en/Days/20101021.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not
- The same facts are found on other websites, so I don't see how they can be copyrighted by pravoslavie. I have also noted them as references. --Spaceflower (talk) 00:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- What I write is the name of the saint and year of death (if known). How can I change or rewrite that? Should I misspell on purpose?--Spaceflower (talk) 00:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current