User talk:Speedoflight

Welcome! Hello Speedoflight, and

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also
  Wikipedia:Topical index
  .

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

-Poli (talk • contribs) 07:37, 2005 July 25 (UTC)

Hi Speedoflight, here is that reference for the Henri Cartier-Bresson passage: From Henri Cartier-Bresson and the Artless Art by Jean-Pierre Montier. Pg. 12, column 2, paragraph 2 "He brought a portable camera, less cumbersome than his first Brownie, but only managed to keep a few of his negatives..." 12.217.192.63

Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.

• Pick an image name.

When uploading an image, pick a file name that is short, descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.

• Source the image.

On the

image description page

, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so. If it's from the web, give a URL. If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.

• Provide copyright and license information.

This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.

If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like

NoRightsReserved

}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.

If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another

fair use

, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.

• Describe the image.

To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page. Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. kmccoy (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If all these images are copyright to the Audie Murphy Research Foundation, how do we justify their use in Wikipedia? kmccoy (talk) 20:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I uploaded the images as copyrighted images with fair use, not meant for reproduction. I could be wrong but I believe fair use copyrighted images are OK to use to accompany articles on Wikipedia.

Well, part of the point of Wikipedia is reproduction. You could try emailing the Audi Murphy Research Foundation to ask if they would be willing to license the use of those photos under a free license like the GFDL or cc-by-sa. Or could make a fair use argument on the photo page. Take a look at some of the links in the note I left above. kmccoy (talk) 06:28, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have just updated and included the Fair Use links/argument on the photo pages. Thanks.

Thanks for taking the time to go back over them. I hope you enjoy working on this project. kmccoy (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the article needs to be wikified (follow the supplied link to see what needs doing) and copy-editing (I'll do it when I get time, if no-one else beats me to it). Until the work has been done, please don't remove the templates. The heading is unnecessary; it divides a short article into two one-paragraph sections, of twhich the second is most of the article (see the Manual of Style on when headings should be used). If you have further questions, please feel free to ask me. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've now wikified and copy-edited the article. I hope that I got the dates of hie reign right. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions. We are trying to build a comprehensive article so the entry can be elevated to featured (front page) status. To do so the text needs to be meticulously footnoted (you can see the process has already started). Can you please add notes to your contributions?

lots of issues | leave me a message 07:50, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out and welcome. lots of issues | leave me a message 08:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Speedof light, Let me join Lotsofissues in thanks for your help with

28 October 2005 should appear identical, though they are written in different formats. It keeps the Commonwealth English and American English folks from spending all their time changing dates back and forth. Cheers, BanyanTree 15:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply

]

I had to revert to a previous version of Rosa Parks to get rid of some undesirable changes introduced by User:Novascotianpatriot. You may want to redo your two most recent edits; I'd reinsert them if I could figure out exactly what you changed, but I figure you'll figure it out faster than I. - Nunh-huh 05:54, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The picture you've added is a vast improvement on the one that was there before. Could you please go back to Image:Hudson.jpg and include the source. There is a bot that goes through removing any fair use images without source information, and chances are, if you don't include a source it'll get deleted before too long. Rossrs 13:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

URL source added to the image. Thanks. --speedoflight | talk to me 05:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice that you've inserted a template on the Bach page. It doesn't add any info, and I'd want to remove the dates of birth and death from the text to avoid repetition.

Is it necessary?

Tony 00:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will leave it there for the moment, and eventually discuss with co-contributors. Thx. Tony 04:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure that the infobox is useful in the first place, but including a country was not historically appropriate, since the notion of a German nation did not develop until the 19th century. There was a German-speaking world, but no Germany, only electorates and free city-states. Tony 11:53, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Bach article is work in progress, and has been rewritten only down to half way through Leipzig. The rest is very scrappy. I won't have time to contribute seriously until March; others may, but somehow I doubt it.

With respect to information about national origin, the people you cite as examples are all from the nation-state era, i.e., the last two hundred years or so. While some nations, such the US and Great Britain, were conceived before this time, it's not true of the German speakers. The problem you mention might be solved by inserting a reference to approximately where he lived in geographical terms; I'll have a look into it. Tony 21:44, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for your comments, Speed; I wasn't, in any case, expecting expertise in the topic on your part, but hoping that more general feedback plus some language editing might be possible. But it's probably better to wait until the other main contributors and I negotiate the 'Style' section, something that may not happen until I'm relatively free of heavy work commitments, in March. Then we'll know where we stand overall.

I notice that reviewers are more focused on inline referencing on the FAC page than they used to be; that's a good think, IMV, although I note that there are sometimes complaints of too much referencing. There's a window of density, I guess, that is honest and practical while not distracting the reader. We'll need to review this issue at a later stage in the Bach article. (May I alert you at the time?)

On the nationality issue, I notice now that the opening sentence contains: 'was a German composer and organist'. That's rather too exact for me (I'd prefer 'German-speaking', but that has problems, I agree). Doesn't 'German', as currently worded, satisfy your earlier query? Tony 04:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the extra days you added to

Regarding the last few edits you made, I think the "elite" statement was referring to her status as an elite skater, and that of the current elite skaters, holding a college degree puts her in a small group. Also, regarding the skating rinks, I saw quotes this weekend from her that showed she was disappointed by the small number of good rinks in Japan. Whether that is the prevailing reason for her move to CT, I don't know. At any rate, the rink she trained at when she was a child is(was) about 2 miles from my house. I've intended to go over and snap a picture or two for this article; but, there's a good chance it is not standing anymore. (The entire facility closed last fall). Neier 23:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have to be very careful when using the term "elite" because if stating that she's an elite skater just because she has a college degree, then it would not exactly be truthful. Lots of athletes in the world hold college degrees and that doesn't make them any more special or unique. The statement would be more true if it were stated that to Japanese standards, her status as a college graduate and that of a fine skater is somewhat unique for I do understand that it's not commonplace for Asian athletes to be college grads, though this is changing very quickly these days. Unlike the US where colleges are heavy into sporting events and athletes are on sports scholarships, etc., I know that colleges in Asia tend to be very academically focused. Thus many college students have to choose between going to college or pursuing a sporting career. In Arakawa's case, she had both - hence, the uniqueness. In regards to her training, many, many world skaters train in the US because of the better facilities. If you do research, you'd find that many of the Russian, European and even Chinese skaters live and train in the US as well. I think that we can state that she trains in the rink at CT because it has superior training facilities and support if compared to rinks in Japan. Arakawa's present coach is based at the skating rink she trains at in CT. It would only be natural for her to be there. --speedoflight | talk to me 09:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the original intent was to say "There are many elite skaters. Shizuka is an elite skater. Shizuka also has a college degree, which is not common among the current elite skaters." I don't know the educational backgrounds of other skaters, so I can't say whether the sentence was appropriate or not. It is fine that it is deleted; but I also don't have any strong objections if it is put back. I just wanted to be sure that it was removed for the right reason (not, because elite seemed to described college graduate). Anyway, I'll stop taking up your time. BTW, I enjoyed your other edits to that article – they were very informative. I was hoping it would grow beyond the stub that it used to be. Neier 09:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to write your feedback. To be honest, I don't know much about Arakawa and mostly learned about her during the ladies' skating competition at the Torino Games. I did not enjoy the lop sided coverage of Cohen and Slutskaya and the lack of respect for Arakawa's skating by NBC and its commentators. So I started reading articles on the Web to learn more about Arakawa. I found it to be a fresh breath of air to see someone else, somewhat like an underdog come in and take the gold. That's what's so wonderful about the Olympic Games...unexpected things happen. --speedoflight | talk to me 10:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

That's pretty funny. I took an interest for pretty much the same reason, only, it was before the Olympics when all of the Japanese announcers were playing up Miki Ando, and to a lesser extent Suguri. Arakawa had won the championships two years ago, so I was puzzled by the lack of respect. Ando has most of the promotional tie-ins, etc. It was amusing to watch TV as the networks replayed the free-skate all morning, and then cut to commercials with Ando. Neier 11:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

Please go to

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Speedoflight. Just to let you know, Singapore Airlines is the only Star Alliance carrier to retain it's corporate logo on the vertical stabilizer for its aircraft in Star Alliance livery. All other Star Alliance liveried aircraft from the other members use the Alliance's logo on the vertical stabilizer. Rgds.

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 23:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Magcover radioprogramma nanamouskouri.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Portrait bhumibol sirikit.jpg)

You've uploaded

Wikipedia's rules for non-free images

. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Photo audiemurphy sons.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk) 16:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Fair use rationale for File:Photo eddiemurphy pamelaarcher2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk) 16:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dvd fried green tomatoes.jpg)

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Sftwins brown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sftwins brown.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to
   di-replaceable fair use disputed
   }}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 03:51, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Stamp dannychan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale

.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Morleywinograd.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale

.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Rosaparks 1964.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosaparks 1964.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article review for Rosa Parks

I have nominated

featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. You have received this notice because you have been identified as one of the top five editors of the article by edit count. Brad (talk) 03:51, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

File source problem with File:Photo jessica tandy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Photo jessica tandy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Non-free rationale for File:Photo lydiashum inlaws outlaws a.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale

.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Photo cartierbresson europe.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale

.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 00:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cdcover dannychan.jpg

You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a
  helpme
  }} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album amasong1.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album amasong2.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Album amasong3.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jjbrown1908.jpg

The file File:Jjbrown1908.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]