If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.richi 12:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.
speedy deletion criterion A7
.
Under the
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add
{{ hangon
}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon }}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. richi 23:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read inconsistent formatting, as you did to Spock (disambiguation) , you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. richi 23:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
In reply to your questions:
No, that's not the only edit you made, if it were, there'd be no problem. You also changed the punctuation so that it was inconsistent with all the other bullets. See diff ... richi 11:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
If you don't understand the deletion rationale, please review the links in the notice I posted to your talk page. If it's still not clear, feel free to let me know which part you don't understand and I'll be happy to advise ... richi 11:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please take care: your edit to Halo broke a wikilink ... richi 20:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Ctep, you
will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
When editing dab pages, please
use consistent formatting. Also, CTEP is not the correct acronym for Cholesteryl ester transfer protein . And you spelled cholesteryl ester
wrong ... richi 13:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
In reply to your question, please see
Wikipedia:Your first article ...
richi 00:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
A db-author
}} to the top of the page.
Phgao 06:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I've edited this quite a bit. I couldn't find anything about a "Peshto Technique", but I did find another WP article that mentions a Pesher Technique. Please take care not to introduce errors into articles. See this diff ... richi 12:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
I observed that you were trying to add some info to the Leonardo article, but it didn't work, so you deleted it. Wise move! sometimes things just stuff up if you don't format a reference quite right!
About the information:-
Every day, almost, new papers are written about Leonardo coming up with amazing ideas, like the notion that there is music encoded in the "Last Supper". Thousands and thousands of words have been written about that painting alone. There simply isn't room for every new idea within that article. The article is already much longer than is recommended and it still doesn't discuss all the important paintings, and doesn't talk about Leonardo's architectural designs at all.
So there is simply no room for an unproven theory of that nature within that brief discussion of the painting, which, you will notice, doesn't even name the disciples, because it isn't an in depth study.
So several other pages have been set up:
Cultural depictions of Leonardo da Vinci
Leonardo da Vinci's personal life
Leonardo da Vinci - scientist and inventor
...and a collection of monographs on the individual works. Perhaps the info could be added to the page on the painting itself. If you go back to the Leonardo page, you will find the right link.
Happy editting!
Amandajm 11:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
My comment would be that it is merely someone's theory. It shows a great deal of cleverness in the person who conceived the idea, but doesn't teach us anything about Leornardo, unless it can be proven to have been his intention.
Despite the fact that Leonardo wrote backwards (he was left-handed so it was physically easier to manage a pen in that way) he did not normally do things in an obscure manner. The notion of hidden and encoded messages is a very Dan-Brownish sort of idea. The "Last Supper" is not about hidden meanings. It is about telling us the viewer a narrative as if we were watching actors on a stage. Leonardo spent his life making obscure things clear, rather than the other way around.
Amandajm 11:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Once again , I must warn you to please take care not to introduce errors . See this edit ... richi 17:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Burning Bush, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style . If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Thank you. richi (talk ) 01:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases, you
will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia.
richi (
talk ) 01:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
Formatting errors can be fixed, and we all have to learn, often from our mistakes, but it's not acceptable to post spam links on Wikipedia. In this case, you linked to a site run by the Ion Channel Media Group. Take a look at my edits to see a much better link to the paper. Not only is this unpolluted by advertising, but it is the full text, not just an abstract. Please also take note of the English spelling policy.
I'm sorry you find the warning templates confrontational. I didn't write them. By my count, you've received more than 15 warnings of various types over the past year. Editors have been indefinitely banned for less ... richi (talk ) 12:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources . Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Tommosimmo (talk ) 04:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[ reply ]
Further to the above: is
Tubectomy the same procedure (or set of procedures) as
Tubal ligation ? If so, it would seem sensible to merge the former to the latter, which has references. --
Tom Tresser (
talk ) 12:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[ reply ]
I have nominated 'Till I Collapse , an article you created, for deletion . I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Till I Collapse . Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Do U(knome)? yes... |or no · 00:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[ reply ]
A
dated prod
}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page .
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
]
Hello, Sriram sh. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page . Mdann52 (talk ) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, Sriram sh. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article
because of the following concern:
Non-notable film, no coverage by independent secondary sources, per
WP:NF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
the article's talk page
.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 15:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[ reply ]
The article Magdalena's Brain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails
independent, reliable sources
.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page .
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process , but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk ) 12:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[ reply ]
Hello, Sriram sh. Voting in the
2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page . MediaWiki message delivery (talk ) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[ reply ]