User talk:Srosenbaum1234

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

Referencing for beginners

. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails

WP:NPOLITICIAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I need help with my draft; my draft has been rejected and I don't understand what specifically about it isn't working.--Srosenbaum1234 (talk) 20:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer- to put in another way- is saying that Rebecca Holcombe does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of

Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising political candidates.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject does not satisfy

nominated for deletion

.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read

the paid editing policy

and make any required declarations.

You may ask for advice about

the Teahouse

.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or

conflict of interest

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I can't figure out how to communicate with my reviewers for my article. I want to improve it so that it is satisfactory to them but I can't figure out how to talk to them. When I mention them on my talk page they don't respond, is there a different way I'm supposed to be doing this? If so, how do I continue through this process? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srosenbaum1234 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anywhere on this page where you attempted to contact a reviewer(aside from your past help me tag that I replied to above) On your draft, in each declined notice, is the name of the reviewer plus a link to their user talk page, which you can use to ask them questions directly. 331dot (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something specific that you don't understand about what I said above, or the other messages on this page? I am following this page, so you may reply here. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, you seem to be getting the wrong message from your reviewers. They are telling you that your subject appears to not meet Wikipedia's WP:notability requirements and no amount of editing can overcome that.

Another way to get another editor's attention is to use a {{

ping}} template. This works on your talk page, on any other talk page (but there's no need for it if you're writing on the addressee's talk page), and in various project discussion pages. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

...but you need to sign your posts with four tildes ~~~~ in order for a ping to work(you should sign your posts anyway). 331dot (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To

conflict of interest question that Robert McClenon asked. Huon (talk) 22:00, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you,

New York Times or Chicago Tribune, for instance, are non-local reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

{{reply to|Robert McClenon}} I am not affiliated with Holcombe; but thank you, I think I understand what I need to improve now.--Srosenbaum1234 (talk) 03:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC) @Robert McClenon: I am not affiliated with Holcombe; but thank you, I think I understand what I need to improve now.--Srosenbaum1234 (talk) 15:22, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rebecca Holcombe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srosenbaum1234! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Rebecca Holcombe (politician). Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

]

Rebecca Holcombe (politician)

The article

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srosenbaum1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]