User talk:Stayfi

• We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Don't edit war the same article as an an anonymous and logged in user. Санта Клаус (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• i didn't understood ur english Санта Клаус! nd i think i know zhy i didn't understood it!! (understand!!) --Stayfi (talk) 21:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Arabic Wikipedia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 01:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This isn't n original research, you can always take look to the articles about mohamed and the vagina, i'll add the in references. it will better also, if u coud understand arabic. i'll try to get a hand ffrom 3 israelis who could. regards --Stayfi (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel inclined to unprotect

reliability. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 14:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Ah ok, rodhull, no problem. --Stayfi (talk) 15:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

لا أعتقد أن أحدا سيرضخ لطلبي، أنا أنصحك أن تأخذ فترة إجازة وتريح نفسك ثم حاول أن تصلح الأمور وتكسب ثقة المجتمع من جديد --Osm agha (talk) 16:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• So...what? Jaysweet, u can always ignore it, no? nd let others see/do, what u don't hav time to see/do (it's relative dear) (there isn't just one admin, nd this is why we're calling many opinions) --Stayfi (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: (there isn't just one admin, nd this is why we're calling many opinions)

Dude, read the links I send you. Please see

WP:FORUMSHOP for why this is an inappropriate thing to do. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Double Dude, u could hav asked me wheter i read it or not! yes i read it, nd i found ur position normal, nd mine also...--Stayfi (talk) 20:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can file a report similar to this, request CU or reply to the accusation. Санта Клаус (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Santa! fno problem --Stayfi (talk) 20:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've put this material back in, again without any sourcing. I've removed it. Please cite your sources on the Talk page before replacing it again. This is your final warning that if it is replaced without sourcing and consensus, you will be blocked, and permanently. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 19:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rodhull, Sources are there in the talk page, nd i put (need citation, on the waiting ones).

As u know, don't force the consensus about it here, hard to get, indeed.

Regards --Stayfi (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've just been blocked indefinitely. Here are the details. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 00:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• FayssalF, u didn't reply to my arguments, before ur block.

TRY to be a good asset to Wikipedia, by FOCUSING on my arguments.

--Stayfi (talk) 00:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most of what is written in this

final word in regards to this matter. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 00:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY. Since you had some involvement with the THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]