User talk:Strangesad

This user believes in the project and is disgusted by the community. As a consequence, she sees sock puppetry as justifiable in certain cases. [1]

Well, this is a quick way to get an indefinite block. Liz

talk • contribs) [reply

]

...and I have so much to lose, you know, the feeling of respect I get from this community... Strangesad (talk) 16:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for intentional violation of topic ban. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Floquenbeam (talk) 17:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 April 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Echo (elephant), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that scientists observed an echo which lasted 65 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Echo (elephant). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you still check in occasionally. The hook for your article did very well; with its April Fools' Day appearance, plus a little "spillover" the next day, it received over 8000 page views. Thanks again for writing the article which helped to create a successful day for DYK. I'm sorry to see how things have worked out for you here. Hopefully some day you can successfully appeal your block and resume editing. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 08:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]