User talk:Superluser

Archives

/Archive 0

Now, almost two years since I started editing Wikipedia and 5 months since a bot put that stupid welcome message up, maybe people will stop telling me "Welcome to Wikipedia." superluser_tc 2007 September 03, 09:04 (UTC)

Hi Superluser, and welcome to wikipedia. Thanks for your message and compliment. You guess the format pretty much spot on. The specimen word is chosen from the language the face was designed for, with selection based somewhat on the time period and a choice of characters that seem to show the face well. I do not have a formal template or anything. But I imagine you could drag one onto your desktop, open it in Illustrator and sort of "rverse engineer" it. I am not at my work computer right now, but would be happy to send you RGB color values for backgrounds, etc. Best, Jim CApitol3 12:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see much in common between your edits and mine, so I doubt we have any common background. Feel free to drop me an e-mail if you want. -- Gabi S. 20:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Hyacinth (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If there's ever a straight-but-not narrow category, I'll probably join. superluser_tc 2008 January 08, 08:59 (UTC)

You're hint that my, or any, argument is not getting far is erroneous in that all arguments have been ignored. The "debate" regarding this issue is the kind of high-jacking by tiny committee people complain about endlessly. Hyacinth (talk) 01:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in participating in the discussion at User talk:Hyacinth/User categories#Proposal. Hyacinth (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the section on the shoes is still in the architecture article

Thanks, but

it's never been orphaned. superluser_tc

 2008 February 18, 13:57 (UTC)

Please see this, because you violated it by notifing Noghtmare is here, and others, with your section about Anqulist(Sorry, don't know how to spell it) This is just a notification. Simon^KSK 01:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How so? My notice was not biased (it stated only the facts and did not attempt to persuade), partisan (it informed editors on both sides of the issue) or secret (it was on-wiki). It was also a limited posting, informing only the two editors directly involved (though I did inform one of the editors via both his user talk page and his IP talk page). I can't see how this is violating WP:Canvas. superluser_tc 2009 February 04, 05:28 (UTC)

You should have used Template:Please see for these kinds of things. Simon^KSK 22:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You characterized information in the article lede as "vandalism." I found a recent edit regarding the birthers' theorizing, which seemed to me not entirely incongruous for the article, since the city has been much in the news recently as a result of this theory. I corrected the grammar and added some detail. I don't object at all to the entire thing being stricken, but I very much object to it being labeled vandalism. The original edit may not have been perfectly encyclopedic, but it seems to me it was probably made with some level of good faith. And my rewrite of it was definitely made in good faith. WP guidelines call for a presumption of good faith, and I object to being labeled a vandal when there's no evidence at all of anything other than a differing opinion about what properly goes in the lede. Monkeyzpop (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The original change reads like vandalism. Perhaps it is not, and I do apologize, but it read that way. Such speculation does not belong in the article. superluser_tc 2009 August 05, 23:30 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the

Hello, Superluser. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]