User talk:Techguy91

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

February 2016

Biographies of living persons has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have restored the redirect. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 17:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Biographies of living persons

That page is not the appropriate spot for your article. By placing it there both the title is wrong & it will break redirects from other pages. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 17:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 25)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Techguy91, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Techguy91/sandbox

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Techguy91/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 18:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Kundan Srivastava

Hi,

I created Article about Kundan Srivastava (http://www.kundansrivastava.com/news/) in sandbox here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Techguy91/sandbox Robert McClenon tried to move this sandbox to Draft: Kundan Srivastava, and was unable to do so. There have been two Miscellany for Deletion drafts of biographies of this individual, both of which resulted in deletion, and the title is now salted against re-creation. Please discuss this with the salting administrator, He Said.

May Draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kundan_Srivastava was deleted many times but i believe this article reliable sources are enough to publish.

IMP Sources - http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Scary-video-Indian-woman-beats-chokes-mother-in-6758996.php http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Shocking-video-of-woman-assaulting-mother-in-law-emerges-online/articleshow/50537993.cms

Google News Source - https://www.google.co.in/search?q=kundan+srivastava&rlz=1C1CHWA_enIN677IN677&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjboeLPvZPLAhUIGo4KHR_VDTgQ_AUIBygB

Please resolve the issue.

Thanks

This individual does not meet our notability guidelines. Please know there's a difference between receiving coverage directly, or being mentioned in coverage about another individual. I've looked through the sources and while it's commendable this individual has taken up this high profile case as part of their cause, it's not remotely close to meeting our individual notability requirements. Policies you should review and thoroughly understand are
disruption. Mkdwtalk 19:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
I strongly suggest you stop
venue shopping at various different talk pages and project spaces to get the outcome you want. Draft:Kundan Srivastava was deleted FIVE times and eventually salted. You've now since re-created it in a different place. Your draft has been reviewed and it's currently up for deletion, again. A number of experienced editors have reviewed it and it's clear the individual does not meet the notability criteria for their own article. If you cannot drop the subject then you will likely be indefinitely blocked until you agree to not re-create or add any content to Wikipedia regarding this individual. Mkdwtalk 19:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Techguy91, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Techguy91! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Legacypac (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]