User talk:Tellyring

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Polyamorph (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh sayani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vansh sayani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tellyring! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vansh sayani. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 00:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh sayani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vansh sayani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reviewing the comments of others and the information above, I have instituted this block. I also don't think your deception with removing prior decline messages from your staffdraft was helpful. You will need to respond to the points made on this page and describe any connection you have with the subject of your edits. 331dot (talk) 10:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After your block expires, please explain your connection to Vansh Sayani. Family? Friend of family? Manager? Also, your Edit summaries are always "I have made some changes." This is useless. The purpose of an Edit summary is to give other editors an idea of the nature of the changes. David notMD (talk) 13:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #43900 is now open. The ANI report says, and I quote, " They have a long history of problematic edits, and have for the last few weeks been trying to create an article about Vansh Sayani, a child actor. They created Draft:Vansh sayani and when that was rejected they inserted the material over the redirect at Vansh Sayani. All without adequate sources, which makes it a serious WP:BLP violation. Despite multiple editors warning them about the copyright and BLP violations involved in their editing, they have edit warred to keep this inappropriate material on Wikipedia. " There is also a problem with non informative edit summaries. Could you address these concerns, please? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the unblock request did not attempt to address the issues which led to the block, and instead claimed that the editor had done nothing wrong. When multiple editors are highlighting issues, we need to see some acknowledgement of those issues and a commitment not to repeat them.  — Amakuru (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #43900 is now closed. I was awaiting a response, but they can reply here just as well. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank the redirect at

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 10:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh sayani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vansh sayani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]