User talk:TheGhost89

Welcome!

Hello, TheGhost89, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sean weldridge, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines

, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called

helpme

}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

Starting an article

Your first article

Biographies of living persons
How to write a great article
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean weldridge

The article

source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of John Kavanagh(MMA)

The article

source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I have sourced the article for you. Some parts still need citations to remain in the article but the article it's self will be able to stay. All the best, Oddbodz (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The gym website is a primary source, and whatever the blog is, it's hardly a

reliable secondary source per Wikipedia's standards. This needs much better sources to show notability, but I expect they can be found. Huon (talk) 20:51, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of Cathal Pendred

The article

source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 13:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Conor McGregor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conor McGregor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conor McGregor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 16:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Diaz, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]