User talk:The H-Man2

Welcome!

Hello, The H-Man2, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Please stop leaving messages for users such as "Go away - Stop deleting these images that no one really cares about." It's rude and unnecessary and will ultimately lead to your account from being treated as a vandalism account. The Rambling Man 13:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if you think it's right, it's still rude and unnecessary. You've been warned. The Rambling Man 13:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm bothered because I consider it rude, offensive and the act of a vandal. Okay? The Rambling Man 13:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it. Now. The Rambling Man 13:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're "serious here" then I suggest you stop adding comments to other user's pages that say "Go away". Continuing to do so will limit your editing capability. The Rambling Man 13:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All admins have a responsibility to enforce Wikipedia policies. Civility is important - otherwise we wouldn't have a policy about it. Please calm down a little. Politeness costs you nothing and makes you look the better (H) man. :-) --Dweller 13:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... if he hadn't admonished you, would you have realised you were doing the wrong thing? --Dweller 14:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, what Dweller said. If it's discourtesy and rudeness, it is my business. Thanks. The Rambling Man 14:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... I think you got caught in the cross-fire with another editor and your comment on his talk page was mistakenly reverted, along with the one he intended to remove, lol. --Dweller 14:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well whether you agree or not, leaving a message like that is unacceptable so please refrain from doing so in the future. Happy editing. The Rambling Man 14:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See

• There is special sensitivity to biographies of living people
  WP:BLP, so these generally get looked at quickly and deleted if they don't conform to the standard criteria. You can always start the article in your user space and not move it into its title until it's ready. You can start here. Carlossuarez46 21:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi H-Man. Not sure about your interpretation of "better", but the version of Scanger you restored was anything but. Please ensure info is sourced and encyclopedic. Thanks, Deiz talk 00:26, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe read up on

WP:RS. Deiz talk 00:19, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Sorry, but I can't make out a lot of what you're trying to say. To clarify: Unsourced information can and will be removed. The observations of a few people who happen to know some skangers violates

WP:V. Some things can be empirically obvious to a great many people - that Big Macs have sesame seeds on the buns, that the sky is blue, that Coca-cola competes with Pepsi. Skangers are a far narrower, disputed realm of knowledge. Sources please. Deiz talk 02:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Have you read this book? I was looking for something to read on his life to use as a source for his article and the Medellin cartel article. I went to Amazon and they were bashing the book, reader reviews that is, claiming the book was not accurate and the author had a lot of basic information wrong, spelling on the native population, years some officials were in office etc. What is your take on it? --SevenOfDiamonds 18:39, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gravano.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gottiincourt.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Cutty Ranks song Limb by Limb was played by Father Fintan Stack in the Father Ted episode New Jack City. " this information is only relevant in the article on the show episode or an article for the song "limb by limb", not the main Cutty Ranks page.--AlexOvShaolin 02:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• "in popular culture" is frowned upon as trivia is. furthermore it undermines Ranks as an artist to say that his music being played in a TV episode is relevant. stuff like this gets taken out of band articles all the time and deleted. this information is relevant to the TV episode, not the main Cutty Ranks article. --AlexOvShaolin 17:46, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kamau Kambon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yahel Guhan 23:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Kazakhstan, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This is wiki-knowledge VegitaU (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Read

WP:NPA. And yeah, I'll have you blocked you if it happens again. Oh, and I'll be monitoring your contributions so it applies if you attack another user. Happy editing! -- VegitaU (talk) 15:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]