User talk:The Honorable/Archive 1

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Cyber Girl of the Year. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TonyTheTiger 21:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. note that although it is possible these edits are serious given your talk page history I am assuming you are not being constructive. TonyTheTiger 21:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The Honorable. I'm curious why you are removing links to interviews, such as this one: 吉井愛美の部屋へようこそ(Yoshii Manami no Heya e Youkoso) VIDEO IDOL INTERVIEW. Is there a policy I am unaware of against providing links to interviews on the subject? Some of these articles cry out so much for any sort of information beyond vital statistics and video titles, it seems to me an interview can be very valuable. Interviews at this particular site seem to be less commercial-oriented than, say, a link to IMDB, in addition to providing an actual interview with the model from which Japanese-reading editors can then check for information to put in the article. Dekkappai 18:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Honorable. I went investigating Wikipedia's link guidelines and found under What should be linked: "Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews." (bolds are mine). So unless you have a reason to specifically exclude these particular interviews and DVD reviews, I'll go ahead and put those links back in. I hope we're in agreement, and appreciate this chance to learn a little more about Wikipedia's policies. Dekkappai 18:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, Honorable. I agree-- and more importantly, Wiki guideline Wikipedia:Citing sources agrees-- that we should use English language sources over foreign-language sources whenever possible. However, in these articles on Japanese porn stars it is often very difficult to find reliable, useful, non-commercial sources only in English, and foreign-language sourcing is better than no sourcing at all. The Wiki guideline further states: "However, do give references in other languages where appropriate. If quoting from a different language source, an English translation should be given with the original-language quote beside it." So, lacking much information on this subject at all in English, I think Wikipedia guidelines show that a link to a Japanese interview on a Japanese subject lacking English sourcing is appropriate. Dekkappai 03:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know that the mature content external links are referenced in the article itself and should not be removed. Thank you for your interest in the article. 68.125.128.132 08:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the writer who originally posted the article on Susan Block which I believe you flagged for "neutrality." I am a professional journalist, but this is my first Wikipedia article. I tried to make the article as neutral, objective and factual as possible, using “neutral language” such as I have seen in other Wikipedia articles. Also, since you (at least, it seems to have been you) flagged it with "the neutrality of this article is disputed," I and others have made several significant changes to the piece. If it was you, can you take a look at the article again, and remove the flag? If you feel there are still problems, could you please be more specific about what the problems are? As I have been doing over the past few weeks, I would be happy to continue to adjust whatever needs to be adjusted to make this article more “Wiki-friendly,” and I appreciate your help. Davidross1943 00:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi –

I'm contacting you because you're listed as an active member of

Thanks – Iamcuriousblue 21:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion occuring

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Miller until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I saw you removed the court records reference from Nikki's article, and I wanted to thank you for doing so. Though I didn't actually know the policy in that regard, I actually intended to use it to validate previous source material concerning her correct date of birth (birth year to be specific), & I actually didn't intend to include the court records as sources this time around (for the OBVIOUS and LOGICAL reasons....even if there were no Wikipedia policy). I was half asleep at the time I did it, and I accidentally left the sources the way they were when the date of birth was last included 2 weeks ago & didn't get back to replace those references. Same goes for her "Boobpedia" page as well (meant to replace those references as well.....that was sort of the result of "cut & paste" from the Wikipedia page actually). Though she has some credits under her real name early in her career, & she has given interviews under her real name with references to her "professional name," I never really wanted to use the court record references in the 1st place due to genuine privacy concerns that I had for her as a real person.....regardless of Wikipedia's policy in the matter. Anyway, thanks again for correcting that for me & removing the court records references in both cases. Jbs173 (talk) 18:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This Ain't..., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Expendables (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current