User talk:The Young Skeptic
{{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. I created a new essay called Wikipedia:Citation underkillThis is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include
Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! QuackGuru (talk) 20:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Trilobites (article series) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trilobites (article series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trilobites (article series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2019 film awards
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2019 awards in the United States
A tag has been placed on
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 08:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve A Cappella Metal
Hello, The Young Skeptic,
Thanks for creating A Cappella Metal! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that
Please add your references and explain why this is notable.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of A Cappella Metal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Cappella Metal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Cappella Metal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Outstrider (June 21)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Outstrider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Mole Day!
Hello! Wishing you a
|
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Draft:Outstrider concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Outstrider, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
Thank you for your attention.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism
Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.
The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.
Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'll be glad to help out. I think there's a need for this project more than ever in the face of things like covid misinformation and the likes. The Young Skeptic (talk) 23:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
WikiProject Amusement Parks discussion
Hello The Young Skeptic! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.
Adog (Talk・Cont) 02:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
WikiProject Amusement Parks reliable source discussion
Hi, The Young Skeptic. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!
- Note: You recieved this notification because you are listed as a participant for WikiProject Amusement Parks.
Harobouri T • C (he/him) 17:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
I see you are a fellow Pastafarian
all hail His Noodliness Allaoii talk 23:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ramen! The Young Skeptic (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ramen! Allaoii talk 20:10, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review