User talk:Thepalerider2012

Hello, Thepalerider2012, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

yeah i know but i didnt find the main article history of quantum mechanics to introduce my changes, although in my opinion i think it is in a good size, i think you should reconsider(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I copied your comment here because it is easier to follow conversations on a single page (see the talk page guidelines) . I have your page on the watchlist for now, so you can reply here.

I'm not sure what you mean. There is a History of quantum mechanics, but Quantum mechanics also has a history section. That's where your edits should go, not the lead of Quantum mechanics. If you want to see how a lead should look, check out a few featured physics articles such as General relativity. RockMagnetist (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i see for the first time i didnt see the history section thx for the advice , may i introduce the previous changes by now (Thepalerider2012 (talk) 19:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Much better! RockMagnetist (talk) 20:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The text you added to the article on Schrödinger in September is an exact copy from this article: O'Conner, J. J. (October 2003). "Schrödinger Biography". University of St. Andrews. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) There are strong laws against copying other people's writing. This doesn't mean you will get in trouble. This does mean that Wikipedia could get in trouble. If Wikipedia didn't keep checking and removing copies, it could get banned from the Internet.

The parts you added need to be rewritten or they will be removed. Write a summary using the reference. If you don't want to write in English, write in Portuguese and put it here. Then we can ask for help translating it at Wikipedia:Translators_available#Portuguese-to-English. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

may i translate content from others wikis?(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 21:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The short answer is Yes. The longer answer is follow the guidelines in Wikipedia:Translation#How_to_translate. You need to put in a reference to the original article the information came from. Do this by putting a "translated from" template on the Talk page of the article. That tells people what article it came from, in what language, and what section of the English article it went into. I can show you how once you've put something in. Happy editing. StarryGrandma (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit at Portal:Science/Featured biography/4, and have re-arranged it a bit. The portal displays a random selection from a list of possible articles which you can see at Portal:Science/Featured biography. You overwrote the fourth article with a new one. I have restored the fourth article and have added your new suggestion at the end of the list. I hope that makes sense.

You may find that other editors disagree with this choice, since

thanks for the help , im still learning how to use wikipedia tools , but i dont get it when u said heisenberg's article is not good , its seems pretty complete to me(Thepalerider2012 (talk) 22:27, 25 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, it looks complete enough to me, too. But these are "official" assessment schemes at Wikipedia - "Wikipedia:Featured articles" and "Wikipedia:Good articles" - and no-one has got round to checking the Werner Heisenberg article against those quality standards since 2009 (Talk:Werner Heisenberg/GA1). (Notice that I am using colons to indent the replies here; another Wikipedia convention) -- John of Reading (talk) 06:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for

i dont understand i just added links to paul dirac's page (Thepalerider2012 (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Have a look at

Wikipedia's guideline on links. There should generally be just one link to any given page - preferably the first time the subject is mentioned. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Nelson Mandela for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]